Arturo Vidal (98 Viewers)

zizinho

Senior Member
Apr 14, 2013
51,816
Oh I don't understand then.Sterling also wanted to leave but what can Liverpool do?Nothing just to ask for 52 mil pounds and get them easily.Yes Vidal was 28 ,so.He had one ijury,so.Khedira didn't play almost an year.So he is also an injury prone?We all have to admit that Bayern ripped off us with this price except something is hidden(player from them) If this is a straight selling than financially is a fiasco.
so we should have offered Vidal to City or PSG when he wanted Bayern?
 

Hust

Senior Member
Hustini
May 29, 2005
93,703
How do you address my Pogba example ?

Disgusting clubs like Barcelona will try to lower the price as much as possible and use the player's interest as a leverage.

We need to be like : fuckers pay the price we want or gtfo.We are talking huge sums in regards to Pogba here.
Well in the case of Vidal, only 2 years left on his contract any grip we had was quickly dissipating.

Thankfully Pogba has a longer term contract (thank god) which will give us more leverage. Plus I see a bidding war. We lost our chance to sell Vidal in a bidding war the summer before his knee injury.

Sorry to the Vidal fans but Pogba has a lot more potential and allure than Vidal had so that helps too.

Marotta saying we will listen to any offers also invites a bidding war IMO. I think there are 3 clubs that would be willing to pay stupid fees: Real, Barca or City. Those are the ones you want to try and get to the negotiating table at the same time.

For me, City we should milk because I'm sure they would love the chance to shit on ManU by bring in Pogba.
 

Hust

Senior Member
Hustini
May 29, 2005
93,703
:agree: if we were a selling club, we would accept the 80M for Pogba, or atleast tell them to offer a bit more and they can get him. but we rejected because he wanted to stay. we only sold those players that wanted to leave, and we didnt even make any problems to them and sold them to the teams they wanted to go to for a fair price, as opposed to what a sellign club would do, create a bidding war and try to sell to the highest bidder
:agree: - if Bayern offered 20m we would have walked away and told Vidal, sorry but no deal. We probably got the absolute most we could considering his past season and contract duration.
 

DUKAC

Senior Member
Feb 29, 2012
12,286
teveZ has always said he wanted to go to boca

Vidal never showed any sign to suggest he WANTS to leave, theres a big difference between wanting something and not minding the opportunity, so either bayern offered him a contract which we refused to match(as confirmed by marotta in the interview) or the accident just drove a wedge between the 2 parties.

A non selling club would just tell bayern to $#@! off and convince the player to stay, it's not like he hated his time here.
This.every word.
 

JCK

Biased
JCK
May 11, 2004
125,381
When the whole thing is mutual, you see the same people defending Marotta that Vidal desperately wanted to leave and the others analysing the phrase that Marotta pushed him out. It's obvious that it's a mutual decision, most probalby Marotta started it so that he can get Götze, hopefully it won't backfire.
 

zizinho

Senior Member
Apr 14, 2013
51,816
Yes if the experts are right but at least we can try to get more money .Not to sell to first low offer.
but we did negotiate. we were there for 2-3 days after all. Bayern are a though club to deal with, you dont go there and make unrealistic demands.

also, the transfer is not official yet, we cant know 100% if the 40M Di Marzio reported are correct or not yet. better wait for the official statement at the clubs website. but lets say it is the official fee, we get ~40M in one installment, so everything this summer, and we have enough money to invest into a new player. so id say better wait for the official fee, AND to see what Marotta does with that money before you criticize
 

Vialli_92

Senior Member
Mar 7, 2013
6,500
Vidal is a legend, he CHOSE to come to Juve when we were finishing 7th in the league. He could have gone to Bayern if he wanted to and he took a big risk coming to Juve where success had not come for a long time.

He gave more than any other Juve player in the 4 years since he was here, he's a Juve legend in my books and in 20 years time when people look back on this cycle of success his name will be the most remembered.
 

zizinho

Senior Member
Apr 14, 2013
51,816
Yes

It's about Juventus' interests. As soon as the player is in the process of being sold I don't give a rats ass about his further comfort.

Otherwise we get ripped off, as seen right now
so we agree everything with PSG and then Vidal refuses to sign a contact because he already said to us he only wants Bayern before we agreed a transfer with PSG. meanwhile, Bayern already signed a new player and arent interested in Vidal anymore and we keep an unhappy player that wont be giving his 100% anymore. what then?
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 91)