Antonio Conte (295 Viewers)

How would you rate Conte's (dis)appointment?

  • 1

  • 2

  • 3

  • 4

  • 5


Results are only viewable after voting.

swag

L'autista
Administrator
Sep 23, 2003
84,750
WΏΏdy;3788010 said:
I love the fact that Conte isnt taking the plea bargain even if it means he gets a year touchline ban.


Imagine winning the scudetto without a coach (of course Conte will be the one training the team behind the scenes) :touched:
As someone who witnessed the Portugal NT's disastrous start to the Euro 2012 qualifying campaign without a coach, I would not recommend it.
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

Hust

Senior Member
Hustini
May 29, 2005
93,703
16.21 PARLA L'AVVOCATO DI CONTE
Inizia l'arringa dell'avvocato Antonio De Rensis in difesa di Antonio Conte: "Non abbiamo riscontri, c'è la parola di una persona, non c'è un'intercettazione, un de relato, un passaggio di soldi, non c'è più niente. Io non sono qui a raccontarvi la favola che Carobbio non è credibile. Carobbio è credibile, ma non è il solo credibile. Quando ci troviamo di fronte a un'incolpazione, laddove non ci sono altri riscontri, bisogna chiamare il dichiarante in correità. La genesi dichiaratoria di Carobbio è molto diversa da quella di Gervasoni, lo chiamerei un 'utilizzatore' di interrogatori. Nelle dichiarazioni del 19 gennaio a Cremona, quello è l'interrogatorio degli interrogatori, e in quella sede Conte non esiste. Carobbio non se lo ricorda, se lo ricorda il 29 febbraio quando va davanti alla procura federale. Le sue accuse vanno contro la storia di Conte, i 20 mesi patteggiati sono la prova provata di un interesse. Siamo in un vortice in cui ci viviamo. Diciamo Carobbio e credibile, Gervasoni è credibile, ma poi uno dice bianco e uno nero. Salvini dice che Carobbio non è del tutto trasparente in alcuni passaggi. Ma se Carobbio fa tutte quelle chiamate con una scheda di un egiziano e parlava con Ilievski, e aveva detto il 29 febbraio che con lui non aveva avuto più alcun contatto, dovrete spiegarmelo nelle motivazioni il perché continuate a credergli. Ci sono state contraddizioni enormi, e ammetterlo per voi significherebbe fortificare il vostro processo, non destituirlo. Questa non è giustizia ma uno scontro puro. Leggete l'audizione del 10 luglio di Carobbio, è una buccia di banana, c'è un silenzio che parla: le telefonate in ritiro con Ilievski. Non poteva dire niente lì, e nessuno glielo ha chiesto. Sarebbe stata la prima cosa che gli avrei chiesto".

You can use google translate
ffs if you are going thru the trouble to post, translate it for us.
 

WΏΏdy?

Senior Member
Dec 23, 2005
14,997
In a perfect world, we wouldn't, but in a calcio that's all about stocks, finances and politics, I'm pretty damn sure we will.
As someone who witnessed the Portugal NT's disastrous start to the Euro 2012 qualifying campaign without a coach, I would not recommend it.
But we would never really be without a coach. Conte will be banned from the touchline and that's about it. Someone mentioned previously that it will be similar to what Jose did while being banned every other match with real. Conte still will be the man behind the play, still the boss.

As for Jem's argument, an interim coach, someone with a good repute with the fans and healthy for the sponsors (like Nedved) can work.



BTW what's Lippi upto these days?
 

Buck Fuddy

Lara Chedraoui fanboy
May 22, 2009
10,880
WΏΏdy;3788045 said:
But we would never really be without a coach. Conte will be banned from the touchline and that's about it. Someone mentioned previously that it will be similar to what Jose did while being banned every other match with real. Conte still will be the man behind the play, still the boss.

As for Jem's argument, an interim coach, someone with a good repute with the fans and healthy for the sponsors (like Nedved) can work.



BTW what's Lippi upto these days?
That's not yet known. He could be banned from all footballing activities. We'll have to wait, for now, but don't get your hopes up.
 

Paid-off-Ref

Senior Member
Dec 16, 2004
4,102
WΏΏdy;3788045 said:
But we would never really be without a coach. Conte will be banned from the touchline and that's about it. Someone mentioned previously that it will be similar to what Jose did while being banned every other match with real. Conte still will be the man behind the play, still the boss.

As for Jem's argument, an interim coach, someone with a good repute with the fans and healthy for the sponsors (like Nedved) can work.



BTW what's Lippi upto these days?

I see a lot of people mentioning Nedved, but does he have a coaching license?
 

Donsazio

Senior Member
Feb 26, 2006
626
I'm not surprised by Conte's decision. What would have been surprising, was if Conte, a man with the kind of integrity and sense of honor that he has, had accepted the plea bargain. Ever since I heard of the plea bargain, I never cared for it, even though it probably would've meant that he could've stayed on as Juventus coach in the end.

I'm happy to see a man that I respect so much, instead will take up the fight with Palazzi and FIGC.

Most likely, the Juve-Conte era ends here. But my respect for him, does not.

Grazie mister, for everything.
If this is the end of the Juve-Conte era, its a damn shame :( a damn damn shame indeed. Things looked so nice in the coming years with Conte at the helm. New stadium, new coach, fellow Juventino, unbeaten season and Scudetto. Words can't describe how bad I and probably the rest of us feel for Conte
 

Collaguazo

Pezuña Brava
Mar 4, 2012
3,610
Where the $#@! is FIFA in all this? They should be putting FIGC on probation and start getting involved in leagues that are so $#@!ed up as this.

Why is everyone just sitting back and letting this $#@! go on?
I don't think FIFA has the right to intervene. They don't event let the government to intervene with the football federation.

I believe they could send a warning to FIGC to get their shit together or risk being banned from international competitions.
 

Gerd

Senior Member
Dec 25, 2011
5,955
ffs if you are going thru the trouble to post, translate it for us.
I haven't traslated the whole post , just a summary .


He says that there is nothing , there is only the word of one person , no calls no money from passing through their hands . I am not here to tell the story that carobbio is not reliable , he is reliable , but not the only one who is reliable . He says that at 19 january when he was questioned he didn't talk about conte , he remembered conte at 29 february in front of the federal prosecution . His plea bargain is a demonstration of interes in his part . We say that carobbio is reliable , gervasoni is reliable , but one says white the other black (pratically these guys have said things contrary to each other and they are both credible :lol:) . Carobbio makes a lot of calls with an egyptian card to ilievski (don't ask me i don't know anything about this) while at 29 february he declared that he hasn't contacted him , so he says he needs explanation why they still believe him .
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 3, Guests: 275)