That is a possibility, and I agree. Juventus can make an appeal to FIFA; however, that is probably unlikely.
Buy on AliExpress.com
Antonio Conte (329 Viewers)
- Thread starter Dostoevsky
- Start date
- Tags goat coach
Buy on AliExpress.com
Did you guys read that?
http://www.juventus.com/juve/it/news/Dichiarazione+di+Andrea+Agnelli
Statement on juventus.com, but I don't understand the most... But I'm sure there will be soon an English translation!
http://www.juventus.com/juve/it/news/Dichiarazione+di+Andrea+Agnelli
Statement on juventus.com, but I don't understand the most... But I'm sure there will be soon an English translation!
Could you explain how or why I spoke too soon?
We, and that includes you, still don't know the facts. Is Conte involved? If yes, just how much? What exactly do they have on him? Etc.
Conte now apparently doesn't want to go for a plea bargain, Palazzi will then obviously go for a punishment that's as severe as possible. Are you familiar at all with plea bargains, because it's not that difficult to understand.
Carobbio is "helping" them, so they'll be lenient towards him, won't they? Even considering that, his punishment is still more severe than what might be facing Conte, so this fool is still correct.
But hey, I should just stick to shouting fuck "insert random name here" without even having a clue about the entire situation. I'm such a fool.
We, and that includes you, still don't know the facts. Is Conte involved? If yes, just how much? What exactly do they have on him? Etc.
Conte now apparently doesn't want to go for a plea bargain, Palazzi will then obviously go for a punishment that's as severe as possible. Are you familiar at all with plea bargains, because it's not that difficult to understand.
Carobbio is "helping" them, so they'll be lenient towards him, won't they? Even considering that, his punishment is still more severe than what might be facing Conte, so this fool is still correct.
But hey, I should just stick to shouting fuck "insert random name here" without even having a clue about the entire situation. I'm such a fool.
Do you not see anything wrong with that? All these guys were apparently present when "conte said that" yet only 1 guy is saying Conte agreed to it.
They make it so blatant in dismissing evidence that proves something wrong yet go on the word of one guy.
In Calciopoli they had "wiretaps" they used as cold hard proof and that was in the news then...there is nothing like this now other than what a guy "remembers".
It depends. Reports are stating he'll be able to train the team - that would be considered a 'touchline ban'. However, if he is banned on grounds that he violated FIGC Rules and Regulations on Ethics, it would be a 'traditional ban' which would remove him from football related activies for that length.
Its seeming that it would be a less harsh 'touchline ban'. But there's no way to know, and we'll have to see what happens at the trial.
Its seeming that it would be a less harsh 'touchline ban'. But there's no way to know, and we'll have to see what happens at the trial.
Could you explain how or why I spoke too soon?
We, and that includes you, still don't know the facts. Is Conte involved? If yes, just how much? What exactly do they have on him? Etc.
Conte now apparently doesn't want to go for a plea bargain, Palazzi will then obviously go for a punishment that's as severe as possible. Are you familiar at all with plea bargains, because it's not that difficult to understand.
Carobbio is "helping" them, so they'll be lenient towards him, won't they? Even considering that, his punishment is still more severe than what might be facing Conte, so this fool is still correct.
But hey, I should just stick to shouting fuck "insert random name here" without even having a clue about the entire situation. I'm such a fool.
We, and that includes you, still don't know the facts. Is Conte involved? If yes, just how much? What exactly do they have on him? Etc.
Conte now apparently doesn't want to go for a plea bargain, Palazzi will then obviously go for a punishment that's as severe as possible. Are you familiar at all with plea bargains, because it's not that difficult to understand.
Carobbio is "helping" them, so they'll be lenient towards him, won't they? Even considering that, his punishment is still more severe than what might be facing Conte, so this fool is still correct.
But hey, I should just stick to shouting fuck "insert random name here" without even having a clue about the entire situation. I'm such a fool.
2 If he is , than it is about 2 matches in his time at siena
3 The word of a known match-fixer , which strangely enough is all they need to suspend him
I'm not surprised by Conte's decision. What would have been surprising, was if Conte, a man with the kind of integrity and sense of honor that he has, had accepted the plea bargain. Ever since I heard of the plea bargain, I never cared for it, even though it probably would've meant that he could've stayed on as Juventus coach in the end.
I'm happy to see a man that I respect so much, instead will take up the fight with Palazzi and FIGC.
Most likely, the Juve-Conte era ends here. But my respect for him, does not.
Grazie mister, for everything.
I'm happy to see a man that I respect so much, instead will take up the fight with Palazzi and FIGC.
Most likely, the Juve-Conte era ends here. But my respect for him, does not.
Grazie mister, for everything.
I love the fact that Conte isnt taking the plea bargain even if it means he gets a year touchline ban.
Imagine winning the scudetto without a coach (of course Conte will be the one training the team behind the scenes)
---------- Post added 02.08.2012 at 20:00 ----------
Not yet Jem, if he gets banned he will be back
Imagine winning the scudetto without a coach (of course Conte will be the one training the team behind the scenes)
---------- Post added 02.08.2012 at 20:00 ----------
Not yet Jem, if he gets banned he will be back
I'm not dismissing anything, unlike 95% of people. That's my entire point.
Also, unlike those 95% of people, I give just as much importance to the anti- Juve stuff/statements/rumours/whatever coming out as to the pro- Juve side of things.
But let me be clear: I sincerely hope we (everyone involved with the club) are cleared of this crap.
Also, unlike those 95% of people, I give just as much importance to the anti- Juve stuff/statements/rumours/whatever coming out as to the pro- Juve side of things.
But let me be clear: I sincerely hope we (everyone involved with the club) are cleared of this crap.
WΏΏdy;3788010 said:
I love the fact that Conte isnt taking the plea bargain even if it means he gets a year touchline ban.
Imagine winning the scudetto without a coach (of course Conte will be the one training the team behind the scenes)
Imagine winning the scudetto without a coach (of course Conte will be the one training the team behind the scenes)
16.21 PARLA L'AVVOCATO DI CONTE
Inizia l'arringa dell'avvocato Antonio De Rensis in difesa di Antonio Conte: "Non abbiamo riscontri, c'è la parola di una persona, non c'è un'intercettazione, un de relato, un passaggio di soldi, non c'è più niente. Io non sono qui a raccontarvi la favola che Carobbio non è credibile. Carobbio è credibile, ma non è il solo credibile. Quando ci troviamo di fronte a un'incolpazione, laddove non ci sono altri riscontri, bisogna chiamare il dichiarante in correità. La genesi dichiaratoria di Carobbio è molto diversa da quella di Gervasoni, lo chiamerei un 'utilizzatore' di interrogatori. Nelle dichiarazioni del 19 gennaio a Cremona, quello è l'interrogatorio degli interrogatori, e in quella sede Conte non esiste. Carobbio non se lo ricorda, se lo ricorda il 29 febbraio quando va davanti alla procura federale. Le sue accuse vanno contro la storia di Conte, i 20 mesi patteggiati sono la prova provata di un interesse. Siamo in un vortice in cui ci viviamo. Diciamo Carobbio e credibile, Gervasoni è credibile, ma poi uno dice bianco e uno nero. Salvini dice che Carobbio non è del tutto trasparente in alcuni passaggi. Ma se Carobbio fa tutte quelle chiamate con una scheda di un egiziano e parlava con Ilievski, e aveva detto il 29 febbraio che con lui non aveva avuto più alcun contatto, dovrete spiegarmelo nelle motivazioni il perché continuate a credergli. Ci sono state contraddizioni enormi, e ammetterlo per voi significherebbe fortificare il vostro processo, non destituirlo. Questa non è giustizia ma uno scontro puro. Leggete l'audizione del 10 luglio di Carobbio, è una buccia di banana, c'è un silenzio che parla: le telefonate in ritiro con Ilievski. Non poteva dire niente lì, e nessuno glielo ha chiesto. Sarebbe stata la prima cosa che gli avrei chiesto".
You can use google translate
Inizia l'arringa dell'avvocato Antonio De Rensis in difesa di Antonio Conte: "Non abbiamo riscontri, c'è la parola di una persona, non c'è un'intercettazione, un de relato, un passaggio di soldi, non c'è più niente. Io non sono qui a raccontarvi la favola che Carobbio non è credibile. Carobbio è credibile, ma non è il solo credibile. Quando ci troviamo di fronte a un'incolpazione, laddove non ci sono altri riscontri, bisogna chiamare il dichiarante in correità. La genesi dichiaratoria di Carobbio è molto diversa da quella di Gervasoni, lo chiamerei un 'utilizzatore' di interrogatori. Nelle dichiarazioni del 19 gennaio a Cremona, quello è l'interrogatorio degli interrogatori, e in quella sede Conte non esiste. Carobbio non se lo ricorda, se lo ricorda il 29 febbraio quando va davanti alla procura federale. Le sue accuse vanno contro la storia di Conte, i 20 mesi patteggiati sono la prova provata di un interesse. Siamo in un vortice in cui ci viviamo. Diciamo Carobbio e credibile, Gervasoni è credibile, ma poi uno dice bianco e uno nero. Salvini dice che Carobbio non è del tutto trasparente in alcuni passaggi. Ma se Carobbio fa tutte quelle chiamate con una scheda di un egiziano e parlava con Ilievski, e aveva detto il 29 febbraio che con lui non aveva avuto più alcun contatto, dovrete spiegarmelo nelle motivazioni il perché continuate a credergli. Ci sono state contraddizioni enormi, e ammetterlo per voi significherebbe fortificare il vostro processo, non destituirlo. Questa non è giustizia ma uno scontro puro. Leggete l'audizione del 10 luglio di Carobbio, è una buccia di banana, c'è un silenzio che parla: le telefonate in ritiro con Ilievski. Non poteva dire niente lì, e nessuno glielo ha chiesto. Sarebbe stata la prima cosa che gli avrei chiesto".
You can use google translate