Well, he does have a point. Even if Conte did say what Carobbrio says he did, nobody is stupid enough to admit it because that would lead to them putting themselves in trouble.
i know people here don't know when to stop if have to agree Italy is a great country imo best place with Spain to go for holiday but what the Figc does makes me mad.
Well, he does have a point. Even if Conte did say what Carobbrio says he did, nobody is stupid enough to admit it because that would lead to them putting themselves in trouble.
But shouldn't they already be in trouble? If Carobbrio tells the truth, then the 23 players should all be charged like Conte has been. It's saddens me to see how 'justice' works in Italy
---------- Post added 03.08.2012 at 16:24 ----------
i know people here don't know when to stop if have to agree Italy is a great country imo best place with Spain to go for holiday but what the Figc does makes me mad.
If a Juve legend is going to be banned for whatever amount of time, then another Juve legend who just recently received his coaching badges should step in
Pretty much everyone, by now, knows fishy things happened. This Palazzi guy is obviously putting more trust in the guy who's confessing, than he is in the guys who claim to know nothing (and back up Conte).
That in itself makes sense to me. But it would also mean that, sooner or later, the people backing up Conte should be charged. And it's extremely quiet on that front...
If a Juve legend is going to be banned for whatever amount of time, then another Juve legend who just recently received his coaching badges should step in
But shouldn't they already be in trouble? If Carobbrio tells the truth, then the 23 players should all be charged like Conte has been. It's saddens me to see how 'justice' works in Italy
---------- Post added 03.08.2012 at 16:24 ----------
I guess the logic here is that you'd rather trust the guy that has nothing to lose than the guys that have everything to lose. I wouldn't trust what they say either, they are saving their asses, not Conte's.
I just don't find what the other 24 guys say here as solid proof, forget about it. Concentrate on why Carobbio decided to involve Conte so late. You'd think mentioning what Conte allegedly did very early in the discussions with the police.
I guess the logic here is that you'd rather trust the guy that has nothing to lose than the guys that have everything to lose. I wouldn't trust what they say either, they are saving their asses, not Conte's.
I just don't find what the other 24 guys say here as solid proof, forget about it. Concentrate on why Carobbio decided to involve Conte so late. You'd think mentioning what Conte allegedly did very early in the discussions with the police.
According to Carrobio, they were at the alleged meeting. If they were there and Carrobio told the truth, why aren't they charged for failure to report as well?
Because they are looking for a scapegoat, which is Conte.
I guess the logic here is that you'd rather trust the guy that has nothing to lose than the guys that have everything to lose. I wouldn't trust what they say either, they are saving their asses, not Conte's.
I just don't find what the other 24 guys say here as solid proof, forget about it. Concentrate on why Carobbio decided to involve Conte so late. You'd think mentioning what Conte allegedly did very early in the discussions with the police.
Who is to say that Agnelli doesn't come up with a lie to involve the FIGC, for example:
Agnelli hits the media that Abete has asked Agnelli & Conte let certain teams draw for the good of the league. Agnelli can just start throwing names out of the sake of it like this guy is doing and you think the prosecuter Palazzi will discard Abete and his defense like he did to Contes? Hell no he wouldn't, he would accept anything the FIGC would say in an instant without thinking twice.
---------- Post added 03.08.2012 at 10:37 ----------