I know Palazzi called the 23 witnesses "irrelevant". Did the magistrates deem it so also or will they take it into consideration when deciding the verdict?
according to carobbio's word all the siena team was in the reunion where conte said that they had agreed with the opposing team for a draw , so tecnically they should have all been accused of omitted denounced . Everytime i try , i fail to understand the logic behing palazzi's reasoning
To avoid compllicating shit more, its easier to just pin this all one somone instead of risking having to change the entire championship and lower leagues.
Well, he does have a point. Even if Conte did say what Carobbrio says he did, nobody is stupid enough to admit it because that would lead to them putting themselves in trouble.