Antonio Conte (365 Viewers)

How would you rate Conte's (dis)appointment?

  • 1

  • 2

  • 3

  • 4

  • 5


Results are only viewable after voting.

enzo

Senior Member
May 14, 2012
2,976
This won't effect us, Conte will be fine. This is stupid.
Exactly. I find this law stupid and problematic. When match fixings are setup, the trainer is hardly ever involved. In a case like this, in which the trainer is informed right before the start of the game, what should he do? Leave and testify against his own team? Even if its just a manager or the president, who is involved, chances are high even the players will be prosecuted for whatever reason. He simply can't do it. And, as absurd this may sound, other clubs will step back and never engange a trainer, who testifyed against his own team. It makes him, although he strictly followed the law, look unloyal.
 

Paid-off-Ref

Senior Member
Dec 16, 2004
4,102
Google translate again:

Juve in the Champions risks. Or maybe not? The reverse of the Republic

Scenarios when utopian and discordant from what was said by the prosecutor De Martino during the press conference, those that emerged from an article by Repubblica.it by Fulvio Bianchi. According to the journalist, in the original article, Juve could be punished by exclusion from the Champions League where Earl should be referred for criminal association (Article 9 of the sporting justice) by the prosecutor Palaces. The latter very soon will start a new series of interviews to clarify the new facts emerged from the Prosecutor of Cremona. Despite the technical allenasse Siena at the time, says Bianchi, Juve could go to trial just as happened for Sampdoria with Bertani (then at Novara) and at Spezia Carobbio with (the accuser of Conte, himself in Siena) and then by regulation not to be entered at the next UEFA Champions League. Indeed, rumors give Juve the footsteps of Pep Guardiola. In a second step, the article was the subject of change, then Reverse Repubblica.it on the issue. Here are the quotes of the article in the first instance:

"But if the Count should be referred for criminal association (Article 9 of the Code of Sports Justice) also Juventus could go to trial as has happened to Sampdoria Bertani and at Spezia Carobbio and at this point for the Uefa regulations may not be registered the Champions "

Here, instead, what appears at a later time:

"Trials in July, up in early August, in time to give the Uefa list of teams admitted to the Italian Cup. But what risk players and clubs? In case of failure to report the disqualification is 8 months, but can drop to 3-4 months if the player or the coach, bargains. In case of wrongful however is much heavier: for three years until the radiation. Juventus then may have to seek a new coach, of course, if the allegations in Count were also confirmed in sports "
 

p0rcupine_tree

love the art in yourself
Feb 27, 2005
491
Google translate again:

Juve in the Champions risks. Or maybe not? The reverse of the Republic

Scenarios when utopian and discordant from what was said by the prosecutor De Martino during the press conference, those that emerged from an article by Repubblica.it by Fulvio Bianchi. According to the journalist, in the original article, Juve could be punished by exclusion from the Champions League where Earl should be referred for criminal association (Article 9 of the sporting justice) by the prosecutor Palaces. The latter very soon will start a new series of interviews to clarify the new facts emerged from the Prosecutor of Cremona. Despite the technical allenasse Siena at the time, says Bianchi, Juve could go to trial just as happened for Sampdoria with Bertani (then at Novara) and at Spezia Carobbio with (the accuser of Conte, himself in Siena) and then by regulation not to be entered at the next UEFA Champions League. Indeed, rumors give Juve the footsteps of Pep Guardiola. In a second step, the article was the subject of change, then Reverse Repubblica.it on the issue. Here are the quotes of the article in the first instance:

"But if the Count should be referred for criminal association (Article 9 of the Code of Sports Justice) also Juventus could go to trial as has happened to Sampdoria Bertani and at Spezia Carobbio and at this point for the Uefa regulations may not be registered the Champions "

Here, instead, what appears at a later time:

"Trials in July, up in early August, in time to give the Uefa list of teams admitted to the Italian Cup. But what risk players and clubs? In case of failure to report the disqualification is 8 months, but can drop to 3-4 months if the player or the coach, bargains. In case of wrongful however is much heavier: for three years until the radiation. Juventus then may have to seek a new coach, of course, if the allegations in Count were also confirmed in sports "


SUPERNEWS WOW!!!
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 2, Guests: 362)