stating facts is disrespectful? nevermind facts me thinking DP wasnt playing well is disrespectful? well hell i think you saying i am being disrespectful is pretty disrespectful
Sums you up really. You make some plea, then you don't even care if people bother to take your opinion seriously. Apparently it was all for your own benefit, not ours.
stating facts is disrespectful? nevermind facts me thinking DP wasnt playing well is disrespectful? well hell i think you saying i am being disrespectful is pretty disrespectful
Ah finally now we re getting somewhere. Similarly i said amauri "deserved" those games, not the lynch mob treatment after every poor showing.
As for the second part of your post, its really astounding how much assumptions you make about me, for an atheist you really believe in a lotta of gris-gris my cause this my benefit that, unless i have stated these things openly i wonder how you d have access to them. Here's an advice discuss the idea forget contextualizing with me as i offer so very little in that department
So you just said DP was terrible for 4 years. Now you're saying Amauri deserves to keep playing while being just as terrible. Good, I'm glad we got it down to something as simple as that. Despite all your variables. It must suck for you to reduce all that opaqueness down to something so elementary.
As for the second part of your post, its really astounding how much assumptions you make about me, for an atheist you really believe in a lotta of gris-gris my cause this my benefit that, unless i have stated these things openly i wonder how you d have access to them. Here's an advice discuss the idea forget contextualizing with me as i offer so very little in that department
People always want to be taken at their word when they're unhappy at how other people have interpreted what they've said and the intentions behind it. If that's your concern maybe you shouldn't have been mr. vague to begin with. Here's the thing: vagueness breeds speculation and guessing. I don't know what your intentions are or what you care about, you barely state anything clearly. Whenever someone claims you care about something you'll be the first to deny it. So when people make assumptions based on clues and general behavior, you shouldn't be surprised.
So you just said DP was terrible for 4 years. Now you're saying Amauri deserves to keep playing while being just as terrible. Good, I'm glad we got it down to something as simple as that. Despite all your variables. It must suck for you to reduce all that opaqueness down to something so elementary.
Lynch mob? Who's exaggerating now?
People always want to be taken at their word when they're unhappy at how other people have interpreted what they've said and the intentions behind it. If that's your concern maybe you shouldn't have been mr. vague to begin with. Here's the thing: vagueness breeds speculation and guessing. I don't know what your intentions are or what you care about, you barely state anything clearly. Whenever someone claims you care about something you'll be the first to deny it. So when people make assumptions based on clues and general behavior, you shouldn't be surprised.
Where or when did i say he needs to play, and when you reduce my argument to some elementary form, dont pin it on me. If you choose to understand it so come out and say it dont hide behind baseless you say's.
I am not surprised i am amused, and expect it least from people i actually do engage in discussion with. Maybe i prefer above all for the idea at hand to be discussed.
Well, I'm gonna take a break now. Catch you later in some other pointless argument that has no clear scope let alone the potential for a useful outcome
Well, I'm gonna take a break now. Catch you later in some other pointless argument that has no clear scope let alone the potential for a useful outcome
Kid? is that all you got little man? is little man too proud to admit he was wrong? go cry in a corner, and let the rest of the forum actually have intelligent discussions.