Aleksandar Kolarov - Lazio - LB (2 Viewers)
- Thread starter Dostoevsky
- Start date
- Status
Juventus 2010/2011 Formation 4-4-2(for now)
----------------------Buffon------------------------
--Grosso----Chiellini-----Bonucci------Motta--
--Martinez--Sissoko---Marchisio--Pepe----------
---------------Del Piero----Amauri-----------------
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
TERENCEE has the above 11 in formation.
Last season our goals for and against ratio was 55/56 respectively.
The above suggests to me that it will improve to something like 70/45. And that's tops. We need to improve that a lot more.
----------------------Buffon------------------------
--Grosso----Chiellini-----Bonucci------Motta--
--Martinez--Sissoko---Marchisio--Pepe----------
---------------Del Piero----Amauri-----------------
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
TERENCEE has the above 11 in formation.
Last season our goals for and against ratio was 55/56 respectively.
The above suggests to me that it will improve to something like 70/45. And that's tops. We need to improve that a lot more.
Forget about involving Poulsen, Amauri, Iaquinta or anyone else of the older players. Lazio might not be against having them but:
1. They won't like to go there.
2. Lazio can't afford even 1/3 of their wages.
Our chance to get him is similar to how Inter got Milito or how we got Amauri. The youth players.
And here I mean Giovinco most of all, plus players like Lanzafame, Ekdal, Pasquato etc. Players with potential and small wages who can in the future bring profit to Lazio (maybe even higher profit than selling Kolarov to City this summer) and can improve their team.
1. They won't like to go there.
2. Lazio can't afford even 1/3 of their wages.
Our chance to get him is similar to how Inter got Milito or how we got Amauri. The youth players.
And here I mean Giovinco most of all, plus players like Lanzafame, Ekdal, Pasquato etc. Players with potential and small wages who can in the future bring profit to Lazio (maybe even higher profit than selling Kolarov to City this summer) and can improve their team.
Of course. The smaller Italian teams do prefer this kind of business. Genoa might have sold Milito (who just turned 30) for 20m eur (and it's a question if they could get that much) but instead they were satisfied with small cash and young players like Bonucci, Acquafresca and Meggiorini. Only by selling Bonucci to us they already made very nice profit. Meggiorini also had a good season and Acquafresca, if he has a good season soon, can bring them good profit too. In the end they will surely end up with more than the ~20m eur they would have gotten if they sold Milito outright.
Not really, because they pump up the price of their player.
For example....Palermo want to sell Amauri. They might ask for 23m eur but they will never get that cash. The most they can hope for is 18-19m. So instead of selling him for 19m eur, they sell him for 13m (12.8 actually) cash and they get Nocerino and half of Lanzafame. Even if they immediately sell Nocerino and half of Lanzafame, they can get 7m eur at least and the total they get will be 20m eur. More than if they sold him for cash only.
Genoa did it too. They sold Milito and Thiago Motta in package. The final price for those two was 39m eur. In reality (even if it turned out that they were worth it for Inter), Genoa was never gonna get ~40m eur for those two, right? The most they could get was 30m eur.
Instead of selling them for 30m euro they sell them for 15m eur+Bonucci, Acquafresca, Meggiorini, Bolzoni and Fatic. Even if Genoa sold those 5 players at the same moment, they were gonna get more than 15m eur.
It suits both the smaller team and the big team, because for the big team 2,3 or even 5 million don't make much difference, but they can act quickly instead of having to sell 3-4 young players first.
Lazio might want that too. City can give them 20m eur cash. To Juve they can sell him for 25m eur which will be consisted of 10m cash+Giovinco+Ekdal+half of Lanzafame. Lazio will in the end surely end up with more than 20m eur.
For example....Palermo want to sell Amauri. They might ask for 23m eur but they will never get that cash. The most they can hope for is 18-19m. So instead of selling him for 19m eur, they sell him for 13m (12.8 actually) cash and they get Nocerino and half of Lanzafame. Even if they immediately sell Nocerino and half of Lanzafame, they can get 7m eur at least and the total they get will be 20m eur. More than if they sold him for cash only.
Genoa did it too. They sold Milito and Thiago Motta in package. The final price for those two was 39m eur. In reality (even if it turned out that they were worth it for Inter), Genoa was never gonna get ~40m eur for those two, right? The most they could get was 30m eur.
Instead of selling them for 30m euro they sell them for 15m eur+Bonucci, Acquafresca, Meggiorini, Bolzoni and Fatic. Even if Genoa sold those 5 players at the same moment, they were gonna get more than 15m eur.
It suits both the smaller team and the big team, because for the big team 2,3 or even 5 million don't make much difference, but they can act quickly instead of having to sell 3-4 young players first.
Lazio might want that too. City can give them 20m eur cash. To Juve they can sell him for 25m eur which will be consisted of 10m cash+Giovinco+Ekdal+half of Lanzafame. Lazio will in the end surely end up with more than 20m eur.
- Status