World's newest state (15 Viewers)

Osman

Koul Khara!
Aug 30, 2002
61,487
No that means I'm anti-semitic ;) Its funny of all the wisdom the old cook spits out, the only rebuttal he constantly gets is he is anti-semitic...despite the fact he is jewish himself :D
 

Osman

Koul Khara!
Aug 30, 2002
61,487
Ok, I just wrote a very long post debating against azzurri77 because I didnt bother to the first time, but did after his sarcastic remark.

BUT OF ALL IT IS EDITED IT OUT NOW (assuming Martin saw it because of the chomsky remark). And I assume its by his hand.


Thats by far the most cowardly bullshit move ever seen around here. Has ZERO grounds to abuse his power like that. And he didnt delete the post so I cant have my post back, he just edited out the words and no coming back.

Martin, who did you sell this site to? ;) So I can complain directly for the demotion of this power tripping kid.
 

Martin

Senior Member
Dec 31, 2000
56,913
Ok, I just wrote a very long post debating against azzurri77 because I didnt bother to the first time, but did after his sarcastic remark.

BUT OF ALL IT IS EDITED IT OUT NOW (assuming Martin saw it because of the chomsky remark). And I assume its by his hand.


Thats by far the most cowardly bullshit move ever seen around here. Has ZERO grounds to abuse his power like that. And he didnt delete the post so I cant have my post back, he just edited out the words and no coming back.

Martin, who did you sell this site to? ;) So I can complain directly for the demotion of this power tripping kid.
WTF? :wth: Who the hell made that edit? That's blatant!
 

Osman

Koul Khara!
Aug 30, 2002
61,487
WTF? :wth: Who the hell made that edit? That's blatant!
Exactly, you saw it, I was just discussing the topic and argumenting his post of how the US wants to get rid of dictators and make democracies, while I argumented the reality of how they support most of the dictators, and only go against those who arent their puppets anymore like in Saddam.


Seriously, who is the owner here? This kind of extreme power abuse must face consequences. I can only assume its azzurri77 because he was the one I was addressing in my post and proving him wrong, why would any other mod be motivated to abuse their power in this case?
 

Azzurri7

Pinturicchio
Moderator
Dec 16, 2003
72,692
Ok, I just wrote a very long post debating against azzurri77 because I didnt bother to the first time, but did after his sarcastic remark.

BUT OF ALL IT IS EDITED IT OUT NOW (assuming Martin saw it because of the chomsky remark). And I assume its by his hand.


Thats by far the most cowardly bullshit move ever seen around here. Has ZERO grounds to abuse his power like that. And he didnt delete the post so I cant have my post back, he just edited out the words and no coming back.

Martin, who did you sell this site to? ;) So I can complain directly for the demotion of this power tripping kid.
I did.

We'll open a thread soon concerning this topic. I don't want to go far with this debate in the Kosovo thread respecting our Balkan mates(Vlatko, Alen, Arif) whom insisted on having a clean topic here.
 

Martin

Senior Member
Dec 31, 2000
56,913
I did.

We'll open a thread soon concerning this topic. I don't want to go far with this debate in the Kosovo thread respecting our Balkan mates(Vlatko, Alen, Arif) who insisted on having a clean topic here.
That's great, so you just deleted a post. How about you split it off to a new thread at least?
 

Bozi

The Bozman
Administrator
Oct 18, 2005
22,747
Exactly, you saw it, I was just discussing the topic and argumenting his post of how the US wants to get rid of dictators and make democracies, while I argumented the reality of how they support most of the dictators, and only go against those who arent their puppets anymore like in Saddam.


Seriously, who is the owner here? This kind of extreme power abuse must face consequences.
its jack.he also lives in sweden and has been known to skin and gut troublemakers
 

Osman

Koul Khara!
Aug 30, 2002
61,487
Bozi: Jack is the owner? And what is Jacks username in this site? (Is it JCK?).


Azzurri, I am not buying that excuse for a second. The last 3-4 pages has been about the US. I was just addressing a post of your own in that topic. You didnt edit/delete any of those posts. But you just happend to delete the one post which was argumenting against you just like that.

If offtopic talk of the last 3-4 pages were the issue, you would have moved those pages (MY POST INLCUDED) to a new thread instead of abuse your powers and censor someone who is debating you for no reason other then with malice.
 

Martin

Senior Member
Dec 31, 2000
56,913
I told him before he made that post not to continue, I even warned myself not to go futher in this topic.
That's nonsense. You let a discussion run free because you think it's worthwhile and then at some point you suddenly decide it must stop. Instead of stopping it you say "oh shucks, maybe a little longer" and you go back and forth over the decision until you finally decide enough is enough. By now the strength of the intervention is completely washed out by your indetermination. If you say "ok from now on back on topic" and people still post and you say it again and people still post and you say it again and Osman comes by and he's new so he hasn't even seen the previous fake warnings you suddenly decide to not edit or delete his post, which would actually send some kind of message, you just edit it by removing all the content pretending it wasn't there? It makes no sense at all.
 

Osman

Koul Khara!
Aug 30, 2002
61,487
I did not see the post above mine of saying go back to topic, because I saw his sarcastic remark towards my post, opened a new window to write all the things I think he is dead wrong in(yeah its really a coincidence my post is the one you totally edited out, you might aswell has deleted it because you took out all the words of the long post). And I did.

I did not think offtopic was an issue because the last 4 pages (didnt even see the Kosovo talks when I jumped to the last pages, thats how long the US has been the topic) has naturally been about the US, and I was addressing a post of the power tripping mod.
 

Azzurri7

Pinturicchio
Moderator
Dec 16, 2003
72,692
That's nonsense. You let a discussion run free because you think it's worthwhile and then at some point you suddenly decide it must stop. Instead of stopping it you say "oh shucks, maybe a little longer" and you go back and forth over the decision until you finally decide enough is enough. By now the strength of the intervention is completely washed out by your indetermination. If you say "ok from now on back on topic" and people still post and you say it again and people still post and you say it again and Osman comes by and he's new so he hasn't even seen the previous fake warnings you suddenly decide to not edit or delete his post, which would actually send some kind of message, you just edit it by removing all the content pretending it wasn't there? It makes no sense at all.
I'll even reply to his post when we open the Iraq discussion. It's not a big deal.

I edited his post though I read it, I made a mistake going off-topic too. But I repeated it for the last time not go to the Iraq topic and he replied with 20 lines post.

Thats nonsense IMO.

My mistake was going off-topic for the 2nd time when I shouldn't have, therefor, I'm warning myself. 4points for me for going off-topic when I promised I wont.


Anything else, I can't really do.


Osma, Marty is the owner.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 15)