Without Religion, would homosexuals be more accepted? (13 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.
OP
Bjerknes

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
115,904
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #4
    You're right, they should. Perhaps we should acquire Makoun to show our solidarity to homosexual fans.

    I bet you that if we had an openly gay player on the team, you'd find folks like Pitbull and JBF giving up on the club and supporting Inter. That's just how childish their notions are regarding the matter.
     

    JBF

    اختك يا زمن
    Aug 5, 2006
    18,451
    #6
    You're right, they should. Perhaps we should acquire Makoun to show our solidarity to homosexual fans.

    I bet you that if we had an openly gay player on the team, you'd find folks like Pitbull and JBF giving up on the club and supporting Inter. That's just how childish their notions are regarding the matter.
    And how the fuck did you come up with this assumption? Oh let me guess, I once sent you a pm telling you that, or even better Byrone sent you one of the pms I sent him a while ago claiming that. While pitbull had this exact statement in his sig...

    Hell I'll make my own assumption then,I bet you'll give up on our team if we had Jihady players playing for this club who openly admit their support for Taliban and Qa'eda.
     
    OP
    Bjerknes

    Bjerknes

    "Top Economist"
    Mar 16, 2004
    115,904
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #7
    So you equate homosexuals with folks who kill people?

    See, there is no end to the absurdity of religion.
     
    OP
    Bjerknes

    Bjerknes

    "Top Economist"
    Mar 16, 2004
    115,904
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #9
    I wouldn't give up on the team, but I certainly wouldn't like the player in question. You would give up on the club because of a homosexual, someone who has a different sexual preference that was given to him. That's very, very pathetic.
     

    swag

    L'autista
    Administrator
    Sep 23, 2003
    84,749
    #10
    I don't think so. The Ancient Greeks had religion, and they invented homosexuality like everything else.

    I think you're interpreting religion as cause-and-effect, when I think it's more correlation. Women's rights, treatment of homosexuality, and local religious beliefs often go hand-in-hand. The religion reflects local culture, but it doesn't always create it.
     
    OP
    Bjerknes

    Bjerknes

    "Top Economist"
    Mar 16, 2004
    115,904
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #13
    I don't think so. The Ancient Greeks had religion, and they invented homosexuality like everything else.

    I think you're interpreting religion as cause-and-effect, when I think it's more correlation. Women's rights, treatment of homosexuality, and local religious beliefs often go hand-in-hand. The religion reflects local culture, but it doesn't always create it.
    But what about religious fundamentalism? That's not the local culture, that's the religion itself.
     

    swag

    L'autista
    Administrator
    Sep 23, 2003
    84,749
    #15
    But what about religious fundamentalism? That's not the local culture, that's the religion itself.
    But religious fundamentalism isn't very well accepted by the same people who accept homosexuals, for example. So to me, your question could be pivoted as "Without homosexuals, would fundamentalist religion be more accepted?"
     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 13)