This going to be another one of those observations (that generally have some basis in reality) that ends up being exaggerated very quickly just by people repeating it and gradually making a bigger and bigger thing of it?
If people think Ogbonna is incredibly stupid, I can only imagine what they must think of Caceres...
This going to be another one of those observations (that generally have some basis in reality) that ends up being exaggerated very quickly just by people repeating it and gradually making a bigger and bigger thing of it?
If people think Ogbonna is incredibly stupid, I can only imagine what they must think of Caceres...
This going to be another one of those observations (that generally have some basis in reality) that ends up being exaggerated very quickly just by people repeating it and gradually making a bigger and bigger thing of it?
If people think Ogbonna is incredibly stupid, I can only imagine what they must think of Caceres...
This going to be another one of those observations (that generally have some basis in reality) that ends up being exaggerated very quickly just by people repeating it and gradually making a bigger and bigger thing of it?
If people think Ogbonna is incredibly stupid, I can only imagine what they must think of Caceres...
I've sometimes wondered how many people in here employ this tactic and I definitely see the point of it, but you do realise that you as a poster lose a lot of credibility through it in the long run?
Having to exhaggerate makes no sense imo. It just seems unnuanced and parochial, and it makes it hard for other people to know what a person really thinks if he always does it. I mean, call a fart a fart and a shit a shit, no need to go the ekstra mile when all it does is it makes the poster seem ignorant...
I'm not sure Zach realizes he's just hurting his own case.
You have to slog through a steaming pile of vitriol and calling people "peasands" to even reach what he's trying yo say. By that point, even if he's right, there's little credibility left.