Wishlist and General Juve mercato talk (2013-14) (65 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

j0ker

Capo di tutti capi
Jan 5, 2006
22,892

TheLaz

Senior Member
Oct 6, 2011
5,537
We are not going back to 4-3-3 and Sanchez was better playing as an SS for Udinese than on the wing.
True. But it's a good arguing when it comes to creating chances offensively. "Don't fix it if it ain't broken" doesn't really apply to Juve's situation since a really good RF (Sanchez) could make the difference. Playing 4-3-3 with the current players isn't wise since we don't have the players for the RF position right now.. I mean, playing three of our current forwards at the same time wouldn't cut it as we have better quality in midfield and defense (wingbacks included), but with a really good RF it could potentially mean a quality injection for the team allround. Sanchez is wasted in Barca (and yes they too play 4-3-3) but they play it very wide as well. Something like a 4-3-2-1 where the offensive midfielders (giovinco and sanchez) are more attackers then midfielders could see good results IMO
 

j0ker

Capo di tutti capi
Jan 5, 2006
22,892
True. But it's a good arguing when it comes to creating chances offensively. "Don't fix it if it ain't broken" doesn't really apply to Juve's situation since a really good RF (Sanchez) could make the difference. Playing 4-3-3 with the current players isn't wise since we don't have the players for the RF position right now.. I mean, playing three of our current forwards at the same time wouldn't cut it as we have better quality in midfield and defense (wingbacks included), but with a really good RF it could potentially mean a quality injection for the team allround. Sanchez is wasted in Barca (and yes they too play 4-3-3) but they play it very wide as well. Something like a 4-3-2-1 where the offensive midfielders (giovinco and sanchez) are more attackers then midfielders could see good results IMO
I like Sanchez but I'd rather play him in 3-5-2 as a SS than as a winger.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 62)