Wishlist and General Juve mercato talk (2011-12) (27 Viewers)

[GordoDeCentral]

True, however, this isn't a football pitch. The sum is the total of the parts and if we look at one part in isolation, it's out of whack. The first point of interaction I have with your typed out words is visual. What's the point in disorienting my senses right from the get go?

This stupid habit of posting lineups from the GK down to the striker has trickled down from it's use in video games rather than from good sense. Which is why I find it annoying.

do you write from the bottom up? i didnt think so, case closed

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[Rollie]

True, however, the sum is the total of the parts and if we look at one part in isolation, it's out of whack. The first point of interaction I have with your typed out words is visual. What's the point in disorienting my senses right from the get go?

This stupid habit of posting lineups from the GK down to the striker has trickled down from it's use in video games rather than from good sense. Which is why I find it annoying. :frown:

Whooooaaaaa trippy shit, yo!

The first point of visual interaction you have (if you're looking solely at a formation) is with the name "Buffon"; I'm sure it's not too difficult for you to compute.

I'm just giving you a hard timethough buddy, kidding around; to each his own.

 

[Xiven]

do you write from the bottom up? i didnt think so, case closed

That is the most brilliant thing I've read on this forum. You, dear sir, are a modern day Einstein, Newton, Da Vinci, Socrates and Kasparov all rolled into one.

:shock:

 

[X Æ A-12]

That is the most brilliant thing I've read on this forum. You, dear sir, are a modern day Einstein, Newton, Da Vinci, Socrates and Kasparov all rolled into one.

:shock:

 

[GordoDeCentral]

That is the most brilliant thing I've read on this forum. You, dear sir, are a modern day Einstein, Newton, Da Vinci, Socrates and Kasparov all rolled into one.

:shock:

i ll take instead ramanujan, leibniz, descartes, diogenes, and charlie chaplin

:awe:

 

[Quetzalcoatl]

:shock:

 

[Xiven]

Whooooaaaaa trippy shit, yo!

The first point of visual interaction you have (if you're looking solely at a formation) is with the name "Buffon"; I'm sure it's not too difficult for you to compute.

I'm just giving you a hard timethough buddy, kidding around; to each his own.

No, no, it's not to my own. This is my good deed for the day; to propagate good sense among the masses around these parts. I could explain it to you once again if you like.

 

[Joe]

 

[GordoDeCentral]

or you can just carry a mirror

 

[Xiven]

i ll take instead ramanujan, leibniz, descartes, diogenes, and charlie chaplin

:awe:

I'll give you Marotta.

 

[GordoDeCentral]

I'll give you Marotta.

and i ll raise you a motta

 

[Joe]

hnohedidnt:

 

[Xiven]

and i ll raise you a motta

Marco or Thiago?

 

[GordoDeCentral]

Mary Jane

 

[Xiven]

I'll fold.

 

[GordoDeCentral]

i think we just had one of these

 

[Joe]

Marco Motta has managed to make me hate all the Marco's in the world.

 

[Xiven]

Marcochist.

 

[Gabriel]

Marco Motta has managed to make me hate all the Marco's in the world.

Even Marchionni?

 

[Linebreak]

Why do you post your lineup from the GK down to the strikers? It goes against the grain of reason. For example, if we were to consider only your back line, the way you have them listed in your lineup...

Lichtsteiner Lugano Chiellini De Ceglie​

Lichsteiner is now your left back and De Ceglie is your right back. Never considered that before, right?

Aside from that, I agree with your thoughts on the team. Not just the first team but even the back ups in each position are more suited to 4-3-3.

Dumb or Dum?