Yes, we should sell Douglas Costa too because he was benched for two games at the start of the season after a WC.
Buy on AliExpress.com
Winter Mercato Thread 2018/19 (16 Viewers)
- Thread starter Mark
- Start date
- Tags ask orgut bring back rakib don't feed the orgut orgut knows best orgutception orgutland who even reads orgut's posts?
- Status
Buy on AliExpress.com
I dont think its comparable...
Its obvious that D.Costa is highly rated by Allegri despite benching him but its not a given about Dybala...
Dybala needs to get into gear and in order to do this he needs to play
D.Costa is always on form - I dont remember a single game in which he didnt perform!
Im not rooting for a Dybala sale but say we should play him and if he doesnt suit us then we have no choice but if he does we get an amazing trio - maybe even the best trio in Europe (along with PSG)
If we dont play him we will never know if he does or doesnt fit..
Its obvious that D.Costa is highly rated by Allegri despite benching him but its not a given about Dybala...
Dybala needs to get into gear and in order to do this he needs to play
D.Costa is always on form - I dont remember a single game in which he didnt perform!
Im not rooting for a Dybala sale but say we should play him and if he doesnt suit us then we have no choice but if he does we get an amazing trio - maybe even the best trio in Europe (along with PSG)
If we dont play him we will never know if he does or doesnt fit..
Again, two games at the start of the season after a WC when Dybala wasn't 100% fit (Allegri even said it out loud, and we saw it in the first game).
So, Douglas Costa not starting is fine but Dybala not starting in two games means a lot more and sets off alarms because he isn't as good or lauded as much by the coach (acc to you). That doesn't make much sense.
It'll be interesting to see if Allegri plays him as a F9 like he should or plays a 4231 more often, but until more games are played, we don't have much data or sample size to react on.
First six months of last season when Dybala was in form.
So, Douglas Costa not starting is fine but Dybala not starting in two games means a lot more and sets off alarms because he isn't as good or lauded as much by the coach (acc to you). That doesn't make much sense.
It'll be interesting to see if Allegri plays him as a F9 like he should or plays a 4231 more often, but until more games are played, we don't have much data or sample size to react on.
First six months of last season when Dybala was in form.
Yeah, we're perfect in attack. Least of worries.
If Kean goes out on loan AND if we play 4231 more often in the future, then we'd need a half decent backup striker who'd be happy to sit on bench. That's about it.
If something happens where we need more wingers, push Cancelo/Cuadrado up and sign a Howedes like RB.
If Kean goes out on loan AND if we play 4231 more often in the future, then we'd need a half decent backup striker who'd be happy to sit on bench. That's about it.
If something happens where we need more wingers, push Cancelo/Cuadrado up and sign a Howedes like RB.
i like how he speaks as if bentancurs just pop out of the woodwork, ffs the player is far from a finished product anywayThe problem with signing proven players is that they cost to much money that we aren’t always willing to spend.
So I would rather have us take a gamble with a youngster than continuing to field players who are finished at top level, like Khedira.
Barella isn’t exactly a gamble though. He would instantaneously upgrade our team. We do not have a single midfielder who combines his speed, tackling, stamina, passing and dribbling.
So I would rather have us take a gamble with a youngster than continuing to field players who are finished at top level, like Khedira.
Barella isn’t exactly a gamble though. He would instantaneously upgrade our team. We do not have a single midfielder who combines his speed, tackling, stamina, passing and dribbling.
I don't know if Barella has already made a quantum leap this season, but I'm guessing he hasn't.
Simply better than Khedira isn't what we need. Can is better than Khedira. Our best midfielders are Pjanic and Matuidi, and we need someone better than them.
Pogba was signed when we had prime Vidal, Pirlo, Marchisio. He wasn't signed as a starter. And comparing Barella with Palermo's Dybala is absurd.
We've nothing else to spend money on next summer, so not sure why you're overly concerned with penny pinching.
Simply better than Khedira isn't what we need. Can is better than Khedira. Our best midfielders are Pjanic and Matuidi, and we need someone better than them.
Pogba was signed when we had prime Vidal, Pirlo, Marchisio. He wasn't signed as a starter. And comparing Barella with Palermo's Dybala is absurd.
We've nothing else to spend money on next summer, so not sure why you're overly concerned with penny pinching.
Barella doesn't have to take a leap to be good enough for our midfield. If we bought Barella today, he would be a starter immediately.
Barella is a significantly more creative passer than Khedira, a far better dribbler, and he's better defensively too.
Keep in mind that Barella played with significantly worse teammates, that makes his superior statistics in creativity (key passes and chances created) all the more impressive.
Barella is a significantly more creative passer than Khedira, a far better dribbler, and he's better defensively too.
Keep in mind that Barella played with significantly worse teammates, that makes his superior statistics in creativity (key passes and chances created) all the more impressive.
- Status