Who is the player Juventus would miss the most and why? (13 Viewers)

Seven

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
#82
Jun 25, 2003
38,228
#82
++ [ originally posted by Jeeks ] ++


In the end I know what you mean and I agree with you, but unfortunately there are others who don't think or see things like you.
Click to expand...
I guess. But I'm one of the biggest del Piero fans on this forum and you have to be blind to disagree with me here. I've stated some serious things towards Capello and Zlatan etcetera, but I've always been consistent. Something I unfortunately can't say about all so called dp-lovers.
 

Zlatan

Senior Member
#83
Jun 9, 2003
23,049
#83
He's not that type of player and will never be, it would be foolish to try to copmletely change his style of play, and it would be a near impossible task. In fact, why do it when we already have one of the best finishers in the world?
 

Zlatan

Senior Member
#84
Jun 9, 2003
23,049
#84
++ [ originally posted by lestat_1987 ] ++
right on seven....we need del piero, not only for football but also for motivation, the man is a living symbol
Click to expand...

Yes, I guess it must be extremely motivting for the other players seing him drag his feet around the pitch almost crying.
 
Seven

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
#85
Jun 25, 2003
38,228
#85
++ [ originally posted by Zlatan ] ++
He's not that type of player and will never be, it would be foolish to try to copmletely change his style of play, and it would be a near impossible task. In fact, why do it when we already have one of the best finishers in the world?
Click to expand...
Because Zlatan could become a better one.
 
Seven

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
#86
Jun 25, 2003
38,228
#86
++ [ originally posted by Zlatan ] ++



Yes, I guess it must be extremely motivting for the other players seing him drag his feet around the pitch almost crying.
Click to expand...
14 goals, Zlatan. That's a lot.
 
OP
lestat_1987

lestat_1987

Senior Member
Thread Starter #87
Aug 31, 2005
1,373
  • Thread Starter
    • Thread Starter #87
    <<originally posted by Zlatan>>
    He's not that type of player and will never be, it would be foolish to try to copmletely change his style of play, and it would be a near impossible task. In fact, why do it when we already have one of the best finishers in the world?
    Click to expand...
    that´s true again...damn
     

    Zlatan

    Senior Member
    #88
    Jun 9, 2003
    23,049
    #88
    ++ [ originally posted by lestat_1987 ] ++


    that´s true again...damn
    Click to expand...

    Quote button, bottom right of every post.


    ++ [ originally posted by Seven ] ++


    14 goals, Zlatan. That's a lot.
    Click to expand...

    So? It has nothing to do with his ability to motivate players. Besides, had Trez been fit he would have score more, 20 easily, and to play DP in stead of Trezeguet is mure madness.


    ++ [ originally posted by Seven ] ++


    Because Zlatan could become a better one.
    Click to expand...

    No. He has his own style of playing football and I dont think he could adapt to being a pure finisher, but even if he could, why the hell would we want to wast some of his other qualities, his dribbling, his assists etc? He's more effective this way.
     
    OP
    lestat_1987

    lestat_1987

    Senior Member
    Thread Starter #89
    Aug 31, 2005
    1,373
  • Thread Starter
    • Thread Starter #89
    Man City asked Juventus for Del Piero
    tribalfootball.com - September 1, 2005

    Manchester City made an approach to Juventus for striker Alessandro del Piero this week.
    Turin media reports state City made an official enquiry after the Italy international, whose future at Juve has been the centre of much debate this summer.

    City wanted to take Del Piero on-loan this season, but Juve insisted on the Premiership club taking on 100 per cent of his wages, which quickly cooled their interest.

    so if City had payed his wage...he would be gone, wow
     
    Lawnchair Bes

    Lawnchair Bes

    The Loser
    #90
    Jan 7, 2004
    29,704
    #90
    ++ [ originally posted by Seven ] ++


    I know it's not fair to say that the goal against Bayern was del Piero's and that the goal against Milan was del Piero's as well.

    Zlatan was mostly responsible for the goal against Bayern and del Piero was mostly responsible for the goal against Milan. That's all.
    Click to expand...

    and zalayeta was mostly repsonsible for the goal against siena
     
    Seven

    Seven

    In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
    #91
    Jun 25, 2003
    38,228
    #91
    ++ [ originally posted by Don Bes ] ++



    and zalayeta was mostly repsonsible for the goal against siena
    Click to expand...
    No, because that wasn't a tap in. Do you play football yourself on a reasonable level, Bes? I do and I can assure you it's not easy to backheel a ball like that.
     
    Seven

    Seven

    In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
    #92
    Jun 25, 2003
    38,228
    #92
    ++ [ originally posted by Zlatan ] ++
    No. He has his own style of playing football and I dont think he could adapt to being a pure finisher, but even if he could, why the hell would we want to wast some of his other qualities, his dribbling, his assists etc? He's more effective this way.
    Click to expand...
    Doesn't mean you have to take away his other qualities. That's even mostly why he would be a better striker than Trezeguet. And TBH Zlatan gives few assists, so that's not really one of his biggest assets anyway. Strikers may dribble you know, it's not forbidden. Quite frankly, Zlatan would be far more effective as a goalscorer, because he's got the strength, the speed and the agility, whereas his vista is rather bad.
     

    Zlatan

    Senior Member
    #94
    Jun 9, 2003
    23,049
    #94
    ++ [ originally posted by Seven ] ++


    Doesn't mean you have to take away his other qualities. That's even mostly why he would be a better striker than Trezeguet. And TBH Zlatan gives few assists, so that's not really one of his biggest assets anyway. Strikers may dribble you know, it's not forbidden. Quite frankly, Zlatan would be far more effective as a goalscorer, because he's got the strength, the speed and the agility, whereas his vista is rather bad.
    Click to expand...

    And Zlatan wouldnt be more effective as a striker, because I dont see his finishing improving that much. And besides, we need someone like Trezeguet to just stand in the box and give our attack a target. Without him we seem lost, DP and Zlatan would drop down too much and not be really sure what to do with the ball. We need a poacher in the box to be the centre point of our attack, and that is not Zlatan.
     
    Zizou

    Zizou

    Senior Member
    #96
    Apr 21, 2003
    3,965
    #96
    These next months will tell us if we really would miss Buffon. In the mean time I guess Cnnavaro, Camoranesi and Emerson are too important for us.
     
    Dan

    Dan

    Back &amp; Quack
    #97
    Mar 9, 2004
    9,290
    #97
    Cannavaro is by far the most important. Well not by far but without him it would be 2003/2004 all over again
     
    Azzurri7

    Azzurri7

    Pinturicchio
    Moderator
    #100
    Dec 16, 2003
    72,692
    #100
    ++ [ originally posted by Don Bes ] ++



    when you guys realize that the goal against bayern was thanks to zlatan and the goal agianst siena was thanks to zalayeta then i ll give credit where its due.

    and this are just few of the crap we "used" to hear every day
    Click to expand...
    :LOL:
     
    You must log in or register to reply here.

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 13)