What is your god like? (12 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Raz

Senior Member
Nov 20, 2005
12,218
So you claim that homosexuals haven't evolved yet?
Please explain this further with details, how does it work? How can a society of Human beings continue to live if they are made of Men Alone? are they gonna lay eggs?
I don`t claim anything, It is you who say such nonsense what if sudently only one sex remained would they survive. And i think it the evolution would have gone the road of only one sex, than yeah than it would have survived, there are a lot of spicies in nature who survive(hermafrodites, dunno how its spelled in english), but they can survive by millions of years of evolution. Btw, why you are so against homosexuals? I for one dont care, let them be, they aint harming me in any way, at least no more than heterosexuals if not less.

In this day of age if all men died i think women would survive without problem :)
 

Hist

Founder of Hism
Jan 18, 2009
11,619
Like I've said before: the reason that more homosexuals have HIV/AIDS in the US and Europe is cultural, not biological. Or do you consider being Haitian unhealthy as well?

And what about gay women? It's a fact that they don't have as much STD's as heterosexual people. Perhaps the most natural sex is the sex between two women then.
actually the source said that lesbians are in more risk than gays.

No, don't be a plonker. But I know of couples who do have children, and the father was not the Holy Spirit.
Then either they :
1) Adopted a child
OR
2) Had heterosexual intercourse.

If there is another way of giving birth please enlighten me?
 

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
Jun 25, 2003
39,342
actually the source said that lesbians are in more risk than gays.
Then your source is very, very, very wrong. People fabricating false evidence is a plague these days.

Do you know how HIV/AIDS is transmitted? Because you sound like someone who doesn't know the first thing about the virus to be honest.
 

Hist

Founder of Hism
Jan 18, 2009
11,619
I don`t claim anything, It is you who say such nonsense what if sudently only one sex remained would they survive. And i think it the evolution would have gone the road of only one sex, than yeah than it would have survived, there are a lot of spicies in nature who survive(hermafrodites, dunno how its spelled in english), but they can survive by millions of years of evolution. Btw, why you are so against homosexuals? I for one dont care, let them be, they aint harming me in any way, at least no more than heterosexuals if not less.

In this day of age if all men died i think women would survive without problem :)
I am not against homosexuals. I am saying that those who choose to be homosexual (nongenetic) are performing an very risky activity. I never insulted them.

There are many species made of the same sex... but we humans are not.

please focus here and see how i build up my argument.
- Human Beings cannot naturally reproduce if there was no sexual intercourse between males and females.
- without reproduction, the species will go extinct.
I really cannot believe you are denying something that self evident.
 

Hist

Founder of Hism
Jan 18, 2009
11,619
Are you really that daft or is it an act: either way, ciao.

Dont avoid the question.

Some one please give me an answer...
HOW DO WE MAKE BABIES?
Does daddy sleep with uncle and after 9 months Uncle lays a baby egg?
Does Mommy Sleep with aunt and get pregnant?


Please ask your homosexual friends, Can they reproduce?
Its not rocket science. You should know this when you are 13 years old
 

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
Jun 25, 2003
39,342
I am not against homosexuals. I am saying that those who choose to be homosexual (nongenetic) are performing an very risky activity. I never insulted them.

There are many species made of the same sex... but we humans are not.

please focus here and see how i build up my argument.
- Human Beings cannot naturally reproduce if there was no sexual intercourse between males and females.
- without reproduction, the species will go extinct.
I really cannot believe you are denying something that self evident.
No one is denying that.

What it comes down to is this:

1) Homosexuality does not kill.
2) HIV/AIDS kills.
3) There are more heterosexuals with HIV/AIDS than there are homosexuals with HIV/AIDS.
4) Lesbians are quite possibly the lowest risk group of them all.
5) If homosexuals get HIV/AIDS because of their unnatural behaviour, then surely we must say that Haitians are unnatural as well?
6) You have been building your argument on false and fabricated evidence.
7) I'm surprised you didn't use the words "gay cancer" yet.
 

Raz

Senior Member
Nov 20, 2005
12,218
As seven said, I did not deny what you said. That species need reproduction to survive.

If you think hard enough maybe you will find more ways to get a girl pregnant than the ones you have mentioned :)
 

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
Jun 25, 2003
39,342
In all fairness the midget thinks that lesbians are the highest risk group. He is obviously deluded and insane and is repeating what some very dodgy dude said to him once. He doesn't believe in statistics, science or the UN's yearly reports on AIDS, but goes by his own little fantasy. That he has got the audacity to talk about HIV/AIDS while knowing absolutely nothing about it is nothing short of astonishing. I say we have to applaud him.
 
Jun 13, 2007
7,233
Dont avoid the question.

Some one please give me an answer...
HOW DO WE MAKE BABIES?
Does daddy sleep with uncle and after 9 months Uncle lays a baby egg?
Does Mommy Sleep with aunt and get pregnant?


Please ask your homosexual friends, Can they reproduce?
Its not rocket science. You should know this when you are 13 years old
Yes, have you every heard of Artificial insemination?
 

Hist

Founder of Hism
Jan 18, 2009
11,619
No one is denying that.

What it comes down to is this:

1) Homosexuality does not kill.
2) HIV/AIDS kills.
3) There are more heterosexuals with HIV/AIDS than there are homosexuals with HIV/AIDS.
4) Lesbians are quite possibly the lowest risk group of them all.
5) If homosexuals get HIV/AIDS because of their unnatural behaviour, then surely we must say that Haitians are unnatural as well?
6) You have been building your argument on false and fabricated evidence.

1) Homosexuality does not kill, yet gives a high risk of health problems and shorter life span.
2) HIV/AIDS kills.
3) There are more heterosexuals with HIV/AIDS than there are homosexuals with HIV/AIDS because the number of homosexuals on earth is negligible in comparison to the number of heterosexuals. The percentage of homosexuals with HIV is vastly higher than the % of heterosexuals.
4) Lesbians are quite possibly the lowest risk group of them all.(less risk than gays not heterosexuals)
5) If homosexuals get HIV/AIDS because of their unnatural behaviour, then surely we must say that Haitians are unnatural as well? I know nothing about haitans so i cannot judge.
6) You have been building your argument on false and fabricated evidence... NO!

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=48542
http://www.catholiceducation.org/articles/homosexuality/ho0075.html#12


By the way
No one is denying that.
Havent you been reading what bianconero and the other guy been saying?
 

Cuti

The Real MC
Jul 30, 2006
13,517
How can lesbians have a higher risk than heterosexuals????

Lesbians use toys amongst other things, and normally these things are cleaned between one time of use and another. So there is minimum physical contact, there will be some, but not as much as with heterosexuals
 

Cuti

The Real MC
Jul 30, 2006
13,517
Artificial not natural.
Just because something is made in a lab does not make it unnatural, cause then flu shots would be unnatural. Labs take natural factors and just improve them, instead of waiting centuries for it to evolve in your body, they do it in labs in a few years/decades
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 12)