Here's my opinion: let's put Migit (dull name, trying too hard) snake and Seven (yawn) in a closed room to see who survies. Then let the winner stay in there to live off the remains of Shreaded Wheat from the daily Del Piero's family breakfast.
There's not much to be added to the 'debate' here, but I'll just note this one thing. Homosexuality has been observed in other species, particularly in apes and monkeys. The notion that it's inherently unnatural is wrong.
I said homosexuality is genetic (natural) in some rare cases but most homosexuals choose to be so.
I am naturally (genetically) heterosexual... i can choose to perform homosexual activities like most homosexuals do.. but i dont because i think it is a health risk.
I said homosexuality is genetic (natural) in some rare cases but most homosexuals choose to be so.
I am naturally (genetically) heterosexual... i can choose to perform homosexual activities like most homosexuals do.. but i dont because i think it is a health risk.
Recent papers have found that homosexuals have a specific gene that makes them attracted to the same sex. You don't choose what you're attracted to, same reasons heterosexuals have different attractions because it's inherent.
I said homosexuality is genetic (natural) in some rare cases but most homosexuals choose to be so.
I am naturally (genetically) heterosexual... i can choose to perform homosexual activities like most homosexuals do.. but i dont because i think it is a health risk.
I said homosexuality is genetic (natural) in some rare cases but most homosexuals choose to be so.
I am naturally (genetically) heterosexual... i can choose to perform homosexual activities like most homosexuals do.. but i dont because i think it is a health risk.
which brings us to the same question i have asked religious folks ever since i started thinking critically "who are you to say what's right and what's wrong?"