What Are You Doing Right Now? (596 Viewers)
- Thread starter ßöмßäяðîëя
- Start date
- Tags gay space iliveforfinasteride iliveforjuve is not white loldevil size queens sweet matt is sweet errwhere virgin devil
Would they have called the police officer a hero if they had been a male?
- - - Updated - - -
@X Æ A-12 this is directed at you you fookin redneck
- - - Updated - - -
@X Æ A-12 this is directed at you you fookin redneck
And there’s been what’s described a “terrorist attack” at an Assyrian church at Wakeley (5 mins from where I live) by a 16 year old kid of Muslim background. He stabbed the bishop and priest and a few of the attendants. The locals detained him and severed his finger lmao
This city is turning to shit by the day. I blame a lot of this on how expensive it is to live here, young people unable to afford homes or rent, rising poverty and shitty access to mental health services.
This city is turning to shit by the day. I blame a lot of this on how expensive it is to live here, young people unable to afford homes or rent, rising poverty and shitty access to mental health services.
For anyone who’s interested: the podcast on JRE between Graham Hancock and Flint Dibble is very interesting. I’ve been waiting for more than a year on it.
Hancock with the hypothesis that a advanced and now lost civilisation existed during the last ice age, Dibble debating it from a hard science point of view. It’s a 4 hour conversation so it’s quite long.
Personally I like Hancocks view, because it speaks to the imagination, but I’m not in a position to deny hard science either. Simply due to the fact that so little has been excavated (Amazon, Sahara, underwater) im still on the fence. And it’s not like nothing has been done, the numbers aren’t even that low, but in percentages you’re speaking about less than 5% for all in the above named places.
Hancock with the hypothesis that a advanced and now lost civilisation existed during the last ice age, Dibble debating it from a hard science point of view. It’s a 4 hour conversation so it’s quite long.
Personally I like Hancocks view, because it speaks to the imagination, but I’m not in a position to deny hard science either. Simply due to the fact that so little has been excavated (Amazon, Sahara, underwater) im still on the fence. And it’s not like nothing has been done, the numbers aren’t even that low, but in percentages you’re speaking about less than 5% for all in the above named places.
