Im about to be aged 33 in 11 days.
But I actually do enjoy dating, well at least the going out part.
But I actually do enjoy dating, well at least the going out part.
Buy on AliExpress.com
What Are You Doing Right Now? (313 Viewers)
- Thread starter ßöмßäяðîëя
- Start date
- Tags gay space iliveforfinasteride iliveforjuve is not white loldevil size queens sweet matt is sweet errwhere virgin devil
Buy on AliExpress.com
I said there's always another one. Not a better one. I think in the end you find one youre attracted to and that you can tolerate and if she feels the same then you stay together.
I also think there are many opinions on relationships and none are better or worse than the other. People tend to overthink these things, when all it comes down to is what you want.
- - - Updated - - -
Maybe, but I really just like going for coffee.
I also think there are many opinions on relationships and none are better or worse than the other. People tend to overthink these things, when all it comes down to is what you want.
- - - Updated - - -
Maybe, but I really just like going for coffee.
There are ever increasing LGBTwhateverthefuckelse groups who are pressurising people into feeling attracted. You get transgender women claiming to be discriminated by 'cisgender' (what?) men who say they simply aren't attracted to people who were born a man.
All of this bullshit is of course the direct result of some people being so damn vain they think they should be allowed into coercing everyone else into feeling attracted to them.
Dude. A dude who is up to his neck in hoochie complaining about the cost of condoms is a bit much to handle here. 
This is a critical and sage question, btw. I've been with the same woman, faithfully, for a couple of decades now. Which isn't to say there hasn't been temptation and second-thoughts along the way. Sometimes, from out of the blue, you never know when you come across someone else who suddenly seems to have a chemistry with you (or at least the way you personally experience it) that can bring the whole thing into doubt and change your worldview a bit.
It's no guarantee of a solid marriage, but I will say this much. You don't marry for love. At least romantic love. That's a recipe for FAIL. What makes you attracted to a person and what makes you a good fit to be married to another person each involve almost entirely different forces or reasons, IMO. I suppose in very rare cases you might be able to suit both. But I'll say for a lot of people the very reasons for what makes a strong romantic attraction to someone can be entirely at odds with what makes them a good, livable life partner.
Romantic love is all about what drives you in attraction about another person at their best. Being married, successfully, can be a lot about learning how to cope and disagree constructively about the things -- often the differences -- that would otherwise pull you apart, and often for how the other person can show you their "worst".
Romantic dating is as much a predictor of a good marriage as watching footie on TV is as much a predictor of your professional goal scoring capabilities.
I think the magic here is in the thinking. You first have to break through to the idea that whether you have a life partner or not, your life is good and you're happy with who you are regardless. Without achieving that first, you're not going to be too attractive and will probably exhibit behaviors that will help repel others.
Spy?
Man, you're getting up there, amigo. (Says the old dude here.)
Eazy just wrote what I did above pretty much.
Like a male chihuahua.
This is a critical and sage question, btw. I've been with the same woman, faithfully, for a couple of decades now. Which isn't to say there hasn't been temptation and second-thoughts along the way. Sometimes, from out of the blue, you never know when you come across someone else who suddenly seems to have a chemistry with you (or at least the way you personally experience it) that can bring the whole thing into doubt and change your worldview a bit.
It's no guarantee of a solid marriage, but I will say this much. You don't marry for love. At least romantic love. That's a recipe for FAIL. What makes you attracted to a person and what makes you a good fit to be married to another person each involve almost entirely different forces or reasons, IMO. I suppose in very rare cases you might be able to suit both. But I'll say for a lot of people the very reasons for what makes a strong romantic attraction to someone can be entirely at odds with what makes them a good, livable life partner.
Romantic love is all about what drives you in attraction about another person at their best. Being married, successfully, can be a lot about learning how to cope and disagree constructively about the things -- often the differences -- that would otherwise pull you apart, and often for how the other person can show you their "worst".
Romantic dating is as much a predictor of a good marriage as watching footie on TV is as much a predictor of your professional goal scoring capabilities.
I think the magic here is in the thinking. You first have to break through to the idea that whether you have a life partner or not, your life is good and you're happy with who you are regardless. Without achieving that first, you're not going to be too attractive and will probably exhibit behaviors that will help repel others.
Spy?
Man, you're getting up there, amigo.
(Says the old dude here.)Eazy just wrote what I did above pretty much.
Like a male chihuahua.
You should have married that russian chick, she's the one.
Maybe it's not too late.
@Salvo
Maybe it's not too late.
@Salvo
Mid mid life, aren't you about 23 or something? That's officially quarter life crisis.
That's officially quarter life crisis.
hence mid mid life crisis
Dude. A dude who is up to his neck in hoochie complaining about the cost of condoms is a bit much to handle here.
This is a critical and sage question, btw. I've been with the same woman, faithfully, for a couple of decades now. Which isn't to say there hasn't been temptation and second-thoughts along the way. Sometimes, from out of the blue, you never know when you come across someone else who suddenly seems to have a chemistry with you (or at least the way you personally experience it) that can bring the whole thing into doubt and change your worldview a bit.
It's no guarantee of a solid marriage, but I will say this much. You don't marry for love. At least romantic love. That's a recipe for FAIL. What makes you attracted to a person and what makes you a good fit to be married to another person each involve almost entirely different forces or reasons, IMO. I suppose in very rare cases you might be able to suit both. But I'll say for a lot of people the very reasons for what makes a strong romantic attraction to someone can be entirely at odds with what makes them a good, livable life partner.
Romantic love is all about what drives you in attraction about another person at their best. Being married, successfully, can be a lot about learning how to cope and disagree constructively about the things -- often the differences -- that would otherwise pull you apart, and often for how the other person can show you their "worst".
Romantic dating is as much a predictor of a good marriage as watching footie on TV is as much a predictor of your professional goal scoring capabilities.
I think the magic here is in the thinking. You first have to break through to the idea that whether you have a life partner or not, your life is good and you're happy with who you are regardless. Without achieving that first, you're not going to be too attractive and will probably exhibit behaviors that will help repel others.
Spy?
Man, you're getting up there, amigo. (Says the old dude here.)
Eazy just wrote what I did above pretty much.
Like a male chihuahua.
This is a critical and sage question, btw. I've been with the same woman, faithfully, for a couple of decades now. Which isn't to say there hasn't been temptation and second-thoughts along the way. Sometimes, from out of the blue, you never know when you come across someone else who suddenly seems to have a chemistry with you (or at least the way you personally experience it) that can bring the whole thing into doubt and change your worldview a bit.
It's no guarantee of a solid marriage, but I will say this much. You don't marry for love. At least romantic love. That's a recipe for FAIL. What makes you attracted to a person and what makes you a good fit to be married to another person each involve almost entirely different forces or reasons, IMO. I suppose in very rare cases you might be able to suit both. But I'll say for a lot of people the very reasons for what makes a strong romantic attraction to someone can be entirely at odds with what makes them a good, livable life partner.
Romantic love is all about what drives you in attraction about another person at their best. Being married, successfully, can be a lot about learning how to cope and disagree constructively about the things -- often the differences -- that would otherwise pull you apart, and often for how the other person can show you their "worst".
Romantic dating is as much a predictor of a good marriage as watching footie on TV is as much a predictor of your professional goal scoring capabilities.
I think the magic here is in the thinking. You first have to break through to the idea that whether you have a life partner or not, your life is good and you're happy with who you are regardless. Without achieving that first, you're not going to be too attractive and will probably exhibit behaviors that will help repel others.
Spy?
Man, you're getting up there, amigo.
(Says the old dude here.)Eazy just wrote what I did above pretty much.
Like a male chihuahua.
I think a big factor is that I've never really had a serious relationship before, closest thing was when I was like 17 but we never made it official. I have had my experiences however, sexual and otherwise. I also know that I'm very picky, but I don't see a point in settling.
Consider it a goal, even if you don't quite 100% achieve getting there.
The oddity is, as a side benefit, you will be more like Dusan in this regard if you do.
Is there a reason they never got too serious? Was that more you or her, or the combination?
These days with hookup culture, I believe there's a lot of people pushing 30 and beyond who truly never had a relationship that serious. While that may seem like a missed opportunity for experience on one hand, it does free you from a lot of potential baggage on the other.
Always.
You could write copypasta. :strong:
The oddity is, as a side benefit, you will be more like Dusan in this regard if you do.
Is there a reason they never got too serious? Was that more you or her, or the combination?
These days with hookup culture, I believe there's a lot of people pushing 30 and beyond who truly never had a relationship that serious. While that may seem like a missed opportunity for experience on one hand, it does free you from a lot of potential baggage on the other.
Always.
You could write copypasta. :strong:
Consider it a goal, even if you don't quite 100% achieve getting there.
The oddity is, as a side benefit, you will be more like Dusan in this regard if you do.
Is there a reason they never got too serious? Was that more you or her, or the combination?
These days with hookup culture, I believe there's a lot of people pushing 30 and beyond who truly never had a relationship that serious. While that may seem like a missed opportunity for experience on one hand, it does free you from a lot of potential baggage on the other.
Always.
You could write copypasta. :strong:
The oddity is, as a side benefit, you will be more like Dusan in this regard if you do.
Is there a reason they never got too serious? Was that more you or her, or the combination?
These days with hookup culture, I believe there's a lot of people pushing 30 and beyond who truly never had a relationship that serious. While that may seem like a missed opportunity for experience on one hand, it does free you from a lot of potential baggage on the other.
Always.
You could write copypasta. :strong:
Totally relate to that last part 
