What Are You Doing Right Now? (2,440 Viewers)
- Thread starter ßöмßäяðîëя
- Start date
- Tags gay space iliveforfinasteride iliveforjuve is not white loldevil size queens sweet matt is sweet errwhere virgin devil
Only seen half of the video yet, wanna concentrate on CL for now, but what it is with the US-American sentiment that the founding fathers were some sort of infallable and omniscent beings?
I'm not just referring to the video, this keeps popping up over and over with any American media. I'm not debating the brilliance of at least most of their minds, and they were incredibly advanced, modern and liberal
P) for their time, but they do not get treated in that way, but rather are elevated into god-like positions, whose ideas of how a state, society, economy or whatever should function are always perfect and true.
Whenever someone backs up their argument with stating that the founding fathers were of the same opinion, the question whether perhaps they could have been wrong, or at least not undebatebly right, or simply wether the historic circumstances of the time simply make their verdict on a particular topic inapplicable to todays situation due to how much has changed since then in this particular issue.
Also, I was incredibly distracted by the amazing match, so please excuse me for any grammatical or orthological errors, or just confusing syntax in general
I'm not just referring to the video, this keeps popping up over and over with any American media. I'm not debating the brilliance of at least most of their minds, and they were incredibly advanced, modern and liberal
P) for their time, but they do not get treated in that way, but rather are elevated into god-like positions, whose ideas of how a state, society, economy or whatever should function are always perfect and true. Whenever someone backs up their argument with stating that the founding fathers were of the same opinion, the question whether perhaps they could have been wrong, or at least not undebatebly right, or simply wether the historic circumstances of the time simply make their verdict on a particular topic inapplicable to todays situation due to how much has changed since then in this particular issue.
Also, I was incredibly distracted by the amazing match, so please excuse me for any grammatical or orthological errors, or just confusing syntax in general