What Are You Doing Right Now? (679 Viewers)

[Ford Prefect]

same can be said about history, lit., philosophy, and pretty much any non-technical degree

Theorising on something that has no proof of existence and hold no real world applications at all other than convincing people of the logical steps you have taken is different than understand the real world we live in and deal with every day.

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[GordoDeCentral]

Theorising on something that has no proof of existence and hold no real world applications at all other than convincing people of the logical steps you have taken is different than understand the real world we live in and deal with every day.

once again same can be said about history, lit., philosophy, and pretty much any non-technical degree

 

[Ford Prefect]

once again same can be said about history, lit., philosophy, and pretty much any non-technical degree

Are you deliberately being stupid or just winging it?

 

[ALC]

History sucks dick imo.

 

[GordoDeCentral]

Are you deliberately being stupid or just winging it?

winging it? what applications are there to metaphysics? how much more accurate and on point than theology is history? is there any literature that it is not fiction?

Now my question, are you so blinded by your hate that you cant put things in perspective?

 

[Ford Prefect]

History sucks dick imo.

History is our only way of understanding why we are where we are, it teaches us not to make the same mistakes and how to better humanity for the future. Theology teaches you to sit down and think about what your imaginary friend wants you to say about them. Pretty big fucking difference. To even consider History and Theology to be on the same level intellectually is one of the most absurd things i've heard and pathetic attempt at baiting me. Its not even an argument.

 

[Kate]

Kate, for some reason your Buffon avatar reminds me of Badass Devil (Maybe the Chinese Jew eyes ) and I think I just puked a bit in my mouth

Oh don't. That's sacrilege right there.

no shame in spreading positive vibes...









or legs

You excite me.

 

[ALC]

History is our only way of understanding why we are where we are, it teaches us not to make the same mistakes and how to better humanity for the future. Theology teaches you to sit down and think about what your imaginary friend wants you to say about them. Pretty big fucking difference. To even consider History and Theology to be on the same level intellectually is one of the most absurd things i've heard and pathetic attempt at baiting me. Its not even an argument.

I don't consider them on the same level of course, its just that I personally hate history

 

[Ford Prefect]

winging it? what applications are there to metaphysics? how much more accurate and on point than theology is history? is there any literature that it is not fiction?

Now my question, are you so blinded by your hate that you cant put things in perspective?

I don't think much of philosophy, I can't say anything about literature without offending Kate and I don't want to. I just answered about history.

Sciences/Social Sciences are real subjects. I consider philosophy as an arts study as do a lot of unis.

 

[GordoDeCentral]

I don't think much of philosophy, I can't say anything about literature without offending Kate and I don't want to. I just answered about history.

Sciences/Social Sciences are real subjects. I consider philosophy as an arts study as do a lot of unis.

thats why i said if you take that stance towards theology than you're banalizing the rest too, myth is not always your enemy just ask joe campbell

 

[Ford Prefect]

thats why i said if you take that stance towards theology than you're banalizing the rest too, myth is not always your enemy just ask joe campbell

History isn't myth. I take the post revisionist stance to history.

 

[GordoDeCentral]

History isn't myth. I take the post revisionist stance to history.

dude, that up there is one of the most contradictory statements i have read on here.

 

[Ford Prefect]

dude, that up there is one of the most contradictory statements i have read on here.

There is more than one school of thought on understanding history, only two of them (reformist/revisionist & orthodox) takes the understanding of history as in state of absolute fact or myth. Nothing is that simple and its really ignorant to view it in that way, which is why most academics don't adhere to either anymore.

The posts on the past page are history now, are they myth? You can read them as they were written.

If you want to talk about ancient history then you have more of a point. Given the role of carbon dating etc. etc. understanding ancient history is a lot easier.

 

[Sheik Yerbouti]

History sucks dick imo.

My interest in history has grown considerably in recent months. It's interesting to know how things were many years ago and how things came into being what they are today. I hope it's something you start to appreciate in time.

 

[Kate]

History's great. But then I do literature...

 

[Enron]

I did 18 hours worth of literature.

 

[Kate]

I did 18 hours worth of literature.

In a swag sense?

 

[Enron]

In a swag sense?

No, I was this [----] close to majoring in it.

 

[ALC]

My interest in history has grown considerably in recent months. It's interesting to know how things were many years ago and how things came into being what they are today. I hope it's something you start to appreciate in time.

Maybe.

 

[Kate]

No, I was this [----] close to majoring in it.

What did you do instead?