What Are You Doing Right Now? (731 Viewers)
- Thread starter ßöмßäяðîëя
- Start date
- Tags gay space iliveforfinasteride iliveforjuve is not white loldevil size queens sweet matt is sweet errwhere virgin devil
Believe it or not, in bars and restaurants, yes. Outside is cool though.
The study of religion is only a shade this side of studying anthropology. I don't get your cocky-assed point.
What I love are reactions like this, which are equal to the reactions someone has about their religious superiority in their own belief system. Two sides of the same coin.
Word.
That shit is already cracked from the earthquake anyway.
The study of religion is only a shade this side of studying anthropology. I don't get your cocky-assed point.
What I love are reactions like this, which are equal to the reactions someone has about their religious superiority in their own belief system. Two sides of the same coin.
Word.
In a swag sense? 
That shit is already cracked from the earthquake anyway.
It's funny that the hotels are smoke free too. Like you can't smoke in your own room, or out in the balcony? That is strange.
That should make Z's job easier. He'll just need a Cessna rather than an Airbus.
Didn't expect a welcoming reaction. Obviously you weren't gonna take me seriously, but that was unforseen.
That should make Z's job easier. He'll just need a Cessna rather than an Airbus.
Didn't expect a welcoming reaction. Obviously you weren't gonna take me seriously, but that was unforseen.
I don't ask Saudia Arabia to behave differently because I am an athiest. I wouldn't set fire to a Syrian Embassy if they drew a cartoon of science. I don't rape children. I don't tell the poorest in the world not to wear condoms.
Thats the difference. I couldn't give a fuck that its a minortiy of a minority, it still happens and shouldn't. You cannot compare atheists to religions, they are polar opposites.
Thats the difference. I couldn't give a fuck that its a minortiy of a minority, it still happens and shouldn't. You cannot compare atheists to religions, they are polar opposites.
Because all religious people, and only religious people, set fire to embassies, rape children, etc.?
That's stroking it there with a pretty broad brush.
They are so similar, it's ridiculous. The dogma. The orthodoxy. The I'm-superior-and-right-and-your-belief-system-sucks-compared-to-mine. The prosthelytizing and preaching. The injecting it in spaces of conversations or social discussions where it was never invited.
I would throw militant atheists and militant religious types in the same pit and burn them all.
That's stroking it there with a pretty broad brush.
They are so similar, it's ridiculous. The dogma. The orthodoxy. The I'm-superior-and-right-and-your-belief-system-sucks-compared-to-mine. The prosthelytizing and preaching. The injecting it in spaces of conversations or social discussions where it was never invited.
I would throw militant atheists and militant religious types in the same pit and burn them all.
I'm sorry, let me get this right. Because other people/organisations rape children or attack embassy's we should just forget that religions do it?
And there is a big fucking difference between a religion and a civillian paedophile. A religion dictates rules and laws which people live their lives by, they offer moral 'guidance' and societies are based around the historic grip on nations that different religions have.
With regards to your last point you don't understand my feelings towards religion. I couldn't care less if someone wants to believe whatever they want to believe, I see it as an idiot tax on the human experience. I have a problem with organised religion and supporters of organised religion - thats what i oppose. You want to burn me in a pit? Thats nice greg
.
Watching the Azzurri and hadn't checked for a while.
---------- Post added 29.02.2012 at 21:42 ----------
Watch the first 10 minutes of that greg before you reply.
And there is a big fucking difference between a religion and a civillian paedophile. A religion dictates rules and laws which people live their lives by, they offer moral 'guidance' and societies are based around the historic grip on nations that different religions have.
With regards to your last point you don't understand my feelings towards religion. I couldn't care less if someone wants to believe whatever they want to believe, I see it as an idiot tax on the human experience. I have a problem with organised religion and supporters of organised religion - thats what i oppose. You want to burn me in a pit? Thats nice greg
.Watching the Azzurri and hadn't checked for a while.
---------- Post added 29.02.2012 at 21:42 ----------
Watch the first 10 minutes of that greg before you reply.
Soon to be out of a job by the looks of things 
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technolo...game-news/9113300/Game-falls-out-with-EA.html
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technolo...game-news/9113300/Game-falls-out-with-EA.html
So what you're saying is that the average person who sends a Christmas card in the mail, maybe doesn't attend church, but slips a fiver now and then to the pastor's charity coffers must therefore rape children and blow up embassies. And that anyone who doesn't profess religious beliefs automatically obtains immunity from ever being accused of child rape and terrorism.
Righhhhhht....
But religions are a construct of people. By the people for the people.
Unless you believe they were first created by some superior being.
Persecuting someone for their religious beliefs is against my moral fiber, is all.
This is exactly the problem with the blurred lines where people think the skeptical movement are supporters of atheism, when in fact they are more agnostic by definition.
Righhhhhht....
But religions are a construct of people. By the people for the people.
Unless you believe they were first created by some superior being.
Persecuting someone for their religious beliefs is against my moral fiber, is all.
This is exactly the problem with the blurred lines where people think the skeptical movement are supporters of atheism, when in fact they are more agnostic by definition.