[WC] World Cup 2014 - General Talk Thread (16 Viewers)

the Champs

  • Argentina

  • Germany


Results are only viewable after voting.

CrimsonianKing

Count Mbangula
Jan 16, 2013
27,321
you rather play holland or chile?
To be honest, neither. I don't see how people say they changed the schedule to help Brazil. Help how exactly? We got two adversaries who are equally good. One has always been, historically, a pain in the ass, the other is one of the best teams with the best support in this WC, they're playing at home really. Besides, no matter the result here Brazil will play to win against Cameroon.

I'd rather play neither, my friend. But i guess between the 2, i'd pick Chile. History teaches us we always kick their asses. Although in this WC history means shit.
 

GordoDeCentral

Diez
Moderator
Apr 14, 2005
70,802
To be honest, neither. I don't see how people say they changed the schedule to help Brazil. Help how exactly? We got two adversaries who are equally good. One has always been, historically, a pain in the ass, the other is one of the best teams with the best support in this WC, they're playing at home really. Besides, no matter the result here Brazil will play to win against Cameroon.

I'd rather play neither, my friend. But i guess between the 2, i'd pick Chile. History teaches us we always kick their asses. Although in this WC history means shit.
when the schedule was made spain was the team to be avoided, so before the WC youd pick any team but spain to meet in the second round.
 

CrimsonianKing

Count Mbangula
Jan 16, 2013
27,321
when the schedule was made spain was the team to be avoided, so before the WC youd pick any team but spain to meet in the second round.
I really don't buy that. But even if it were true, Spain is gone. To play knowing the result between Holland vs Chile do us no good. It changes nothing, we're still to beat Cameroon and play whoever finishes 2nd.
 

Bayernstar

Heritage of Kahn
Mar 16, 2013
1,174
To be honest, neither. I don't see how people say they changed the schedule to help Brazil. Help how exactly? We got two adversaries who are equally good. One has always been, historically, a pain in the ass, the other is one of the best teams with the best support in this WC, they're playing at home really. Besides, no matter the result here Brazil will play to win against Cameroon.

I'd rather play neither, my friend. But i guess between the 2, i'd pick Chile. History teaches us we always kick their asses. Although in this WC history means shit.
Well maybe you are right and brazil can handle chile better than holland, but you never know, this WC is unpredictable as you said also there is no heavy underdog, which people dont understand.
i think only australias watching that game
:lol:
 

AFL_ITALIA

MAGISTERIAL
Jun 17, 2011
31,792
so according to the itv panel, england could hav won the game if they dived, cheated, tricks but they didnt because its not their culture as the english are well off and non-english players come from a life of poverty and so have to cheat their way up (strachan used mexico and uruguay as examples)...even gus poyet as on the panel and he nodded in pproval but pursed his lips...trying to keep his pundit gig im sure

disgusting
Is there a video of this?
 

GordoDeCentral

Diez
Moderator
Apr 14, 2005
70,802
I really don't buy that. But even if it were true, Spain is gone. To play knowing the result between Holland vs Chile do us no good. It changes nothing, we're still to beat Cameroon and play whoever finishes 2nd.
dont buy what? :D theres nothing to buy, schedule was set before competition started and for no logical or useful reason brazils last game was delayed until their potential future adversaries are known. And this is the perfect scenario actually, had spain qualified first, brazil would want to draw here, against a cameroon side that has nothing to play for, with both mexico and croatia having to go for the win.
 

CrimsonianKing

Count Mbangula
Jan 16, 2013
27,321
dont buy what? :D theres nothing to buy, schedule was set before competition started and for no logical or useful reason brazils last game was delayed until their potential future adversaries are known. And this is the perfect scenario actually, had spain qualified first, brazil would want to draw here, against a cameroon side that has nothing to play for, with both mexico and croatia having to go for the win.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 13)