[WC] World Cup 2010 - General Talk Thread (41 Viewers)

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
Jun 25, 2003
39,343
Its been a farce, 2002 pales in comparison.

Teams like Mexico and now Uruguay can only imagine what could have been had ther been good refereeing.
2002 was very bad because I had the feeling certain teams were penalised to allow others to advance. The refs in those games were simply malicious.

This year I don't think they're malicious. They've been incredibly poor, but most are hardly professionals and they aren't being helped at all, while the game is becoming faster and faster. Something needs to be done, because this isn't credible at all. Can one honestly say Holland were the best team today?

This sucks :depressed
 

Alen

Ѕenior Аdmin
Apr 2, 2007
53,995
Its been a farce, 2002 pales in comparison.

Teams like Mexico and now Uruguay can only imagine what could have been had ther been good refereeing.
Yes, and it will comfort them while in reality nothing different would have happened and they'd have been eliminated by the better team anyway.

Today's call wasn't really a rip off. Technically the linesman might have called it offside but technically there should be 300% more fouls than they're given and every corner kick should result with a penalty.
 

king Ale

Senior Member
Oct 28, 2004
21,689
No. That's different. What Suarez did wasn't cheating. He did whatever he could to help his team within the rules. He knew he was going to get sent off. Uruguay were punished, the right call was made. Suarez gambled in hoping that Ghana would miss.

There's a HUGE difference.
I never said he cheated. I say it is flaw in the rules when you deny a team of a GOAL, turning it to a goal opportunity. This has to be changed.

You handle the ball off the line, you get sent off and the opponent is given a penalty kick. So what the opponent gets is a penalty kick + playing with one man more for the rest of the game. But Ghana were denied a goal and they got only a penalty kick in return as it was the last minute of the game and it is not fair.

There is no harm in calling for the goal in such incidents without sending the guilty player off.
 

Fred

Senior Member
Oct 2, 2003
41,113
Yes, and it will comfort them while in reality nothing different would have happened and they'd have been eliminated by the better team anyway.

Today's call wasn't really a rip off. Technically the linesman might have called it offside but technically there should be 300% more fouls than they're given and every corner kick should result with a penalty.
How about Van Bommels foul on Rios in the build up for the first goal??
 

GordoDeCentral

Diez
Moderator
Apr 14, 2005
70,836
No. That's different. What Suarez did wasn't cheating. He did whatever he could to help his team within the rules. He knew he was going to get sent off. Uruguay were punished, the right call was made. Suarez gambled in hoping that Ghana would miss.

There's a HUGE difference.
no, it's actually the same thing, suarez didnt know he was going to get sent off for sure just like Diego didnt know he scored for sure.
 

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
Jun 25, 2003
39,343
Yes, and it will comfort them while in reality nothing different would have happened and they'd have been eliminated by the better team anyway.

Today's call wasn't really a rip off. Technically the linesman might have called it offside but technically there should be 300% more fouls than they're given and every corner kick should result with a penalty.
Nothing different would have happened? The game really wasn't favouring the Dutch at that point. No one knows what would have happened. Every wrong call that gifts a team the decisive goal IS a rip off, Alen.
 

Ken

The Dutch Touch
Aug 17, 2007
13,340
Congrats man.

If it wasn't for you, Patrick and Van Persie i would have hated the Dutch team after today :D
:D Thanks.

Congrats Ken, YOU'VE FUCKIN MADE IT!! :D



Just remember who was saying the Dutch is gonna win the whole things before the tournament even kicked off :eyebrows:
Thanks!

:lol: Too true. Let's hope you're right, and we don't fuck up on Sunday, though I believe Spain/Germany will rip our defence a new one.

Congrats, Ken.

I laughed when Van Persie blocked Sneijder's shot. :D
Thank you boys! :heart:

Van Persie :lol:
 

king Ale

Senior Member
Oct 28, 2004
21,689
Yes, and it will comfort them while in reality nothing different would have happened and they'd have been eliminated by the better team anyway.

Today's call wasn't really a rip off. Technically the linesman might have called it offside but technically there should be 300% more fouls than they're given and every corner kick should result with a penalty.
That goal decided the game.
 

Alen

Ѕenior Аdmin
Apr 2, 2007
53,995
How about Van Bommels foul on Rios in the build up for the first goal??
It was before the goal was scored? I saw it much later in a replay but I wasn't sure if it was before the goal.
Yes, unfortunate for Uruguay. Small detail that changed the game a little.

They'd have lost even without that goal. They had 1:1 and they lost it.
 

Ken

The Dutch Touch
Aug 17, 2007
13,340
Van Bommel was a beast today though, you could tell we missed De Jong. De Zeeuw is not up for this kind of thing, Van Marwijk should've started with Afellay.
 

Alen

Ѕenior Аdmin
Apr 2, 2007
53,995
That goal decided the game.
And every not given penalty for pushing during corners might decide the game.

Come on, Van Persie didn't touch the ball and it was a minor offside, which looked almost on line and the linesman always gives advantage to the attacker in these on-line situations. Yes, technically the goal should have been disallowed but we started complaining about all sorts of things and acting like typical Italians now.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 40)