We weren't after van der Vaart, no need to cry over what happens with him. Ranieri made it clear that we're not looking for an AMC.
This is all right. We may argue here if we needed him or not but the coach didn't want such player.
What i'm worried about is something else.
We weren't after vdV but we were after Flamini, Alonso, Stankovic and Poulsen. Since we tried to sign them then Ranieri obviously though that he needs them.
The problem is that we wanted to buy only 1 of them.
Now, apart from Flamini and Poulsen who are similar (same) type of players, Alonso and Stankovic, even though midfielders, are very much different than the other two.
So the question is what was our priority ? Did we need a DMC, an all round midfielder like Stankovic or a deep lying playmaker like Alonso ?
We discuss here, sometimes argue, what is our priority in midfield. Some say a creative midfielder, some want more versatile players, some AMC's, some DMC's.
But at least we know what we want.
With Ranieri it seems as if he doesn't really knows what he wants.
We were after Flamini, that's fine. Why didn't we try to buy another DMC after we failed with Flamini but we went to Liverpool to try buying Alonso ? After things with Alonso got complicated why didn't we try to buy a DMC or another playmaker like Alonso but we tried to get Stankovic ?
At the end we bought Poulsen, but i'd have been much more calm if we went after Poulsen right after we missed out on Flamini.
It seems to me as if we don't have our priorities set .