US Presidential Elections thread - the fate of the world to be decided (25 Viewers)

Who would you vote to be the next President of the United States?

  • John McCain

  • Barack Obama

  • undecided


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
Jun 25, 2003
38,227
What do you mean not accepted? Why would it be accepted the first time? If anything, since it already happened once it's likely to be more accepted this time.
Well, it was accepted, wasn't it? Nothing was done about it.

Btw it's true what you said Osman (I almost typed Obama there :D ), McCain grabbed onto Joe Plumber to dumb down the discourse yet again. Palin wasn't enough, we need to lower the conversation even more to reach those people out there who are dying to vote for us just as soon as we speak in their words.

It's so interesting to me that a guy who self proclaimed makes $250k/year becomes a mouth pieces against taxes, posing to be the common man. How many people in America make that much in a year?
That's why republicans are a morally bankrupt party. They try to turn the public in stupid and poor losers that can be fed propaganda. It's elitist and it's dictatorshiplike, but they make it look as if they want people to be independent. And your average loser cop certainly buys it.
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
111,601
You know, there is so much fear spreading around over an Obama Presidency that the people who are scared of him may go completely psycho. I have never seen such a polarized and extreme electoral base out of any election I've ever followed. Now since crunch time is here, true inklings come out of the woodwork and my Facebook is littered with updates of "Fuck Obama" and " ________ is thinking Obama will get a__________d." Lets see what lunacy appears over the next couple days. I have a feeling it's going to reach a new nasty level of epic proportions.
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
111,601
Well, it was accepted, wasn't it? Nothing was done about it.



That's why republicans are a morally bankrupt party. They try to turn the public in stupid and poor losers that can be fed propaganda. It's elitist and it's dictatorshiplike, but they make it look as if they want people to be independent. And your average loser cop certainly buys it.
It's successful stuff though. Even my well educated lawyer Uncle buys into it.

But then again, he's seen his city raped and pillaged under Black and democratic rule, although he doesn't understand that the likes of Ronald Reagan and the Ford Family are more to blame for the collapse of the Motor City.
 

Quetzalcoatl

It ain't hard to tell
Aug 22, 2007
65,540
On the right to bear arms thing. Not any and everybody should be able to bear arms, that's just crazy. Burke is right in that there will always be criminals with guns, but if anyone can have one, there will be a lot more criminals with guns, and more "normal" people will become criminals.

Although... the first opportunity I get, I'm owning a gun. Gotta protect myself and family, and not only from the criminals.
 

swag

L'autista
Administrator
Sep 23, 2003
83,481
You know, there is so much fear spreading around over an Obama Presidency that the people who are scared of him may go completely psycho. I have never seen such a polarized and extreme electoral base out of any election I've ever followed. Now since crunch time is here, true inklings come out of the woodwork and my Facebook is littered with updates of "Fuck Obama" and " ________ is thinking Obama will get a__________d." Lets see what lunacy appears over the next couple days. I have a feeling it's going to reach a new nasty level of epic proportions.
Not all that different from 2004, really. Except then I think we had more on the line with the election. Except we totally blew it.

Not that Kerry was a godsend. But sheesh, per yesterday's NY Times:

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/02/opinion/02kristof.html

"An unscientific poll of 109 professional historians this year found that 61 percent rated President Bush as the worst president in American history. ... More than 98 percent of the historians in the poll, conducted through the History News Network, viewed Mr. Bush’s presidency as a failure."
This election is critical. But it's not quite 2004. The colossal damage has already been done for that mistake in 2004.

Well people are scared to hell of things that are new. When it's not a white man in the oval office who knows what might happen.
In 2004, people weren't scared enough of things that were familiar.

It's successful stuff though. Even my well educated lawyer Uncle buys into it.

But then again, he's seen his city raped and pillaged under Black and democratic rule, although he doesn't understand that the likes of Ronald Reagan and the Ford Family are more to blame for the collapse of the Motor City.
You're forgetting Matt Millen.

After all, George W Bush is the Matt Millen of presidents.
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
111,601
On the right to bear arms thing. Not any and everybody should be able to bear arms, that's just crazy. Burke is right in that there will always be criminals with guns, but if anyone can have one, there will be a lot more criminals with guns, and more "normal" people will become criminals.

Although... the first opportunity I get, I'm owning a gun. Gotta protect myself and family, and not only from the criminals.
There will always be criminals with guns because we live in a gun culture. If we started to become stricter on weapon control once the 20th century began, we would have much less of a problem. But since we have stuck our foot in the beehive there will always be a gun culture here, city or countryside.

Not all that different from 2004, really. Except then I think we had more on the line with the election. Except we totally blew it.

Not that Kerry was a godsend. But sheesh, per yesterday's NY Times:

This election is critical. But it's not quite 2004. The colossal damage has already been done for that mistake in 2004.
I don't recall there being such a phobia regarding Kerry or Bush from either side of the lines though. Sure, both candidates were deemed as bad candidates, but I didn't see as much fear factor being propagated regarding Kerry being a socialist or going to some way help Hamas. The Repubs were just claiming the Dems wouldn't secure the nation as well as they would, and it worked. Nowadays they claim Obama will destroy the nation for all intents and purposes.

That's the level of fear factor we are now accustomed to, which can be almost anything thrown at Obama. Then considering the race factor we're playing with dynamite.

But you're right about the damage. It's already been done and the wounds will continue to bleed.



In 2004, people weren't scared enough of things that were familiar.
True.


Tomorrow is either a start to a new future or the beginning of the end.
We've been in the beginning of the end for a while now.

I'm going to drink a lot of vodka tomorrow.
Hopefully me as well.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 25)