If it is still about the subject, I guess John McCain eventually would be the next US president. The reason is clear- like the last time, democrats seem cannot unite themselves and stand on a same word.
Buy on AliExpress.com
US Presidential Elections thread - the fate of the world to be decided (3 Viewers)
- Thread starter Zlatan
- Start date
- Status
Buy on AliExpress.com
Here you guys go-
http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewPolitics.asp?Page=/Politics/archive/200804/POL20080401c.html
all I know is if a white Italian priest shot off the N-bomb regarding blacks, or "towelheads" regarding Middle-eastern people, this whole fucking place would be up in arms
the guy is an ignorant racist, and people must realize that if Obama gets in, than so does he
http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewPolitics.asp?Page=/Politics/archive/200804/POL20080401c.html
all I know is if a white Italian priest shot off the N-bomb regarding blacks, or "towelheads" regarding Middle-eastern people, this whole fucking place would be up in arms
the guy is an ignorant racist, and people must realize that if Obama gets in, than so does he
I clipped my toenails today. Word has it Andy would approve... 
But back on topic, if every presidential candidate had to be screened for their associates in life, George W would have a string of coke-addled alcoholics. Reagan was pals with people who killed priests, supported Saddam Hussein and Osama Bin Laden (against the Soviets), and on the racism card, the guy even kicked off his presidential campaign in the town famous for "Mississippi Burning". Abraham Lincoln was one of the worst offenders of the concept of "patronage" -- often choosing sometimes crooked "friends" for the political purpose.
Not to defend who Obama befriends here. But be realistic. To be a politician in this country and to get where you are, you're going to make some compromising friends and relationships along the way. To say any of those presidents above shouldn't have gotten in on that basis of their friendships and alliances would be more than a bit myopic.
But back on topic, if every presidential candidate had to be screened for their associates in life, George W would have a string of coke-addled alcoholics. Reagan was pals with people who killed priests, supported Saddam Hussein and Osama Bin Laden (against the Soviets), and on the racism card, the guy even kicked off his presidential campaign in the town famous for "Mississippi Burning". Abraham Lincoln was one of the worst offenders of the concept of "patronage" -- often choosing sometimes crooked "friends" for the political purpose.
Not to defend who Obama befriends here. But be realistic. To be a politician in this country and to get where you are, you're going to make some compromising friends and relationships along the way. To say any of those presidents above shouldn't have gotten in on that basis of their friendships and alliances would be more than a bit myopic.
I clipped my toenails today. Word has it Andy would approve...
But back on topic, if every presidential candidate had to be screened for their associates in life, George W would have a string of coke-addled alcoholics. Reagan was pals with people who killed priests, supported Saddam Hussein and Osama Bin Laden (against the Soviets), and on the racism card, the guy even kicked off his presidential campaign in the town famous for "Mississippi Burning". Abraham Lincoln was one of the worst offenders of the concept of "patronage" -- often choosing sometimes crooked "friends" for the political purpose.
Not to defend who Obama befriends here. But be realistic. To be a politician in this country and to get where you are, you're going to make some compromising friends and relationships along the way. To say any of those presidents above shouldn't have gotten in on that basis of their friendships and alliances would be more than a bit myopic.
But back on topic, if every presidential candidate had to be screened for their associates in life, George W would have a string of coke-addled alcoholics. Reagan was pals with people who killed priests, supported Saddam Hussein and Osama Bin Laden (against the Soviets), and on the racism card, the guy even kicked off his presidential campaign in the town famous for "Mississippi Burning". Abraham Lincoln was one of the worst offenders of the concept of "patronage" -- often choosing sometimes crooked "friends" for the political purpose.
Not to defend who Obama befriends here. But be realistic. To be a politician in this country and to get where you are, you're going to make some compromising friends and relationships along the way. To say any of those presidents above shouldn't have gotten in on that basis of their friendships and alliances would be more than a bit myopic.
Well, it's a theory that hasn't been entirely discredited. Of course it seems like an absurd theory, but just because this person may believe in such a thing doesn't mean his other points are invalid. I mean, I could say that I like to smell my own shit and people would think that I'm some sort of whack job, but that shouldn't be taken into account if I say the war on Iraq is about oil and shady money... because it's the truth.
back to the issues...I saw the debate last wednesday night, and as much as I despise Hillary, I thought she was better. Obama squirmed the entire night when it came to the tough questions, and frankly, his answers were shit
Obama has a lot of skeletons in his closet....mostly when it comes to people he's associated with, and TBH, I dont think he could win a general election against Mc Cain- Obama is too much of a liberal socialist, which wont win him votes with the religious/conservative masses
Obama has a lot of skeletons in his closet....mostly when it comes to people he's associated with, and TBH, I dont think he could win a general election against Mc Cain- Obama is too much of a liberal socialist, which wont win him votes with the religious/conservative masses
- Status