UAPs (14 Viewers)

[U Picciriddu]

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[swag]

But that’s not a UAP

 

[Fab Fragment]

Aliens might actually be around us but in a dimension that we humans can't discern. Cue cats.

 

[swag]

Aliens might actually be around us but in a dimension that we humans can't discern. Cue cats.

So the Burger King employee at the deep fryer making my french fries could be a lizard man -- his eyelids did seem funny -- and we should consider him a UAP.

 

[U Picciriddu]

 

[U Picciriddu]

Great video

 

[swag]

I wish I had two hours of my day to waste of conspiracy videos

 

[U Picciriddu]

I wish I had two hours of my day to waste of conspiracy videos

Well you had 20 years to waste your time on a forum, didn’t hear you complaining about that

 

[swag]

But I get enjoyment out of that

 

[U Picciriddu]

Today there are hearings in the Mexican congress about the UAPs. Do we have any Mexicans?

 

[Quetzalcoatl]

Today there are hearings in the Mexican congress about the UAPs. Do we have any Mexicans?

What are you expecting/hoping to come out from all of this?

I don't expect anything interesting tbh

 

[U Picciriddu]

What are you expecting/hoping to come out from all of this?

I don't expect anything interesting tbh

I think that we’re heading to some form of disclosure, unless something happens that really shifts the political agenda (new pandemic or war).

But the spectrum of disclosure is big aswel, it could be ‘we know there are things that aren’t from earth, and that’s it’, to ‘yes we’ve been back engineering stuff for decades’.

I think that both the political and scientific attention given to this subject is way too much that it won’t just fade away as being nothing. The ‘controlled disclosure campaign’ is really something else and it’s legislation.

 

[swag]

Today there are hearings in the Mexican congress about the UAPs. Do we have any Mexicans?

The only thing Mexico has to do with NASA is T-shirt sales

 

[Dostoevsky]

I wish I had two hours of my day to waste of conspiracy videos

Why bother with the thread? You're second most active poster here. For somebody that doesn't care I see no reason to visit the place.

 

[swag]

Why bother with the thread? You're second most active poster here. For somebody that doesn't care I see no reason to visit the place.

I’m partly intrigued by the anthropology of it. Some minds want to be blown. But the same thing that will blow some minds is also the same thing that many would respond with, “So what, Man United is gonna lose this weekend.”

 

[U Picciriddu]

Not strictly in line with UAPs, but NASA found a molecule that’s a by-product of life here on earth on a planet 120 light years from earth. Quite a interesting week

https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2023/09/12/nasa-exoplanet-water-life/70830603007/

 

[U Picciriddu]

Ok I wasnt expecting this

 

[JuveJay]

They look very much like shrunken mummies I've seen before from South America.

 

[Mark]

I never understood why Aliens would look so fragile. I'd expect much better versions of us.

 

[U Picciriddu]

From what I've read the journalist/ufologist presenting the bodies (Jaime Maussan) has a reputation of being a con man/hoaxer and making wild claims without evidence.

"Mr Maussan has previously been associated with claims of “alien” discoveries that have later been debunked, including five mummies found in Peru in 2017 that were later shown to be human children."

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/aliens-in-mexico-congress-ufo-b2410477.html
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/techn...well-slides-ufo-researcher-apologises-5680059
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/alien-mummy-peru/
https://cryptidz.fandom.com/wiki/Metepec_Creature

I was reading into it with a co-worker after lunch, we found the same links and quote as you posted.

You know at one side, let’s take the neutral approach and see how the scientific community will respond to this.

At the other side I want to add another layer of perspective to this. Imagine you’re from the Mexican government and your job is to organise this historic hearing. Wouldn’t you avoid a con man or sensationalist, instead of brining him onder oath with these materials. It would also really discredit the other speakers and kinda destroy the legitimacy of the hearing if the guy was full of shit. Besides that I want to add, as far as I know (haven’t seen the hearings), he’s the one presenting the materials, the guy who did the scientific research was someone else.