Trayvon Martin (20 Viewers)

GordoDeCentral

Diez
Moderator
Apr 14, 2005
70,780
People in this country just devour a little drama like this to get them by their days.

As a nation and especially those that are talking the loudest on this subject need to address black on black crime. Maybe when you start to respect and value the lives of your 'own kind', maybe then others will start to value yours too.

We also need to address modern day segregation & ghettoization. A city like Potomac in Montgomery County, populated by successful businessmen, lawyers, doctors, politicians, athletes, etc. and is considered among the best places to live in the nation, has laws that ban the opening of businesses such as 7-11's, pawn shops, strip clubs, etc. because they won't want 'randoms'/the wrong element coming into their area. 'Randoms' being sugar coating for blacks, hispanics, brownies, druggies, prostitutes, etc. and where liquor stores are required to shut down early...but drive 20-25 min in either direction to say Prince George's County, which has one of the highest population of African American's, and you'll find 7-11's, late night liquor stores, pawn shops, strip clubs, and soon maybe even a casino. Is this just a coincidence?
thats just supply and demand brother
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

Zé Tahir

JhoolayLaaaal!
Moderator
Dec 10, 2004
29,281
Clearly there's a demand for it in Montgomery County as well otherwise they wouldn't be making trips out to PG County on the daily to get stuff.
 

Hængebøffer

Senior Member
Jun 4, 2009
25,185
Clearly there's a demand for it in Montgomery County as well otherwise they wouldn't be making trips out to PG County on the daily to get stuff.
This is a problem. The rich people can create their own protectionism, but people will just say it's natural like Deneb just said. But when the government tries to solve the problem, the same people will cry about Socialism and that the government are taking away their freedom
 

IrishZebra

Western Imperialist
Jun 18, 2006
23,327
Nothing wrong with not wanting a pawn shop or strip club or late night off-licence in your neighborhood.

Indeed, their existence is a social problem not a glory of freedom.
 

Enron

Tickle Me
Moderator
Oct 11, 2005
75,659
People in this country just devour a little drama like this to get them by their days.

As a nation and especially those that are talking the loudest on this subject need to address black on black crime. Maybe when you start to respect and value the lives of your 'own kind', maybe then others will start to value yours too.

We also need to address modern day segregation & ghettoization. A city like Potomac in Montgomery County, populated by successful businessmen, lawyers, doctors, politicians, athletes, etc. and is considered among the best places to live in the nation, has laws that ban the opening of businesses such as 7-11's, pawn shops, strip clubs, etc. because they won't want 'randoms'/the wrong element coming into their area. 'Randoms' being sugar coating for blacks, hispanics, brownies, druggies, prostitutes, etc. and where liquor stores are required to shut down early...but drive 20-25 min in either direction to say Prince George's County, which has one of the highest population of African American's, and you'll find 7-11's, late night liquor stores, pawn shops, strip clubs, and soon maybe even a casino. Is this just a coincidence?
Nah son, and everybody knows that the good cocaine in PG comes from Potomac too.

- - - Updated - - -

That doesn't make it right.
I still :lol: at 7Eleven attracting the wrong people.
Only a certain type of person goes after those burger dogs.
 

swag

L'autista
Administrator
Sep 23, 2003
84,749
You missed my point, it was not about how much one suffered or whether one has suffered more than the other; all I meant was that it was not for a dishonest selfish gain. Important to notice.
Would it be equally honest if supporters of the current Syrian regime came out with a similar poster? Something about people who have had their neighborhoods destroyed by vigilantes and the hearts of their dead sons eaten know how Trayvon's parents have suffered?

I sincerely doubt ReBeL would approve.

Point is that neither side of that civil war have any stake in the matter, nor any relevance to it. They're just milking a dead kid for publicity.

But even then, I'm truly sorry but those two situations are not even close to be comparable and unfortunately, yes, it's notable. Someone that has lived something worse shows you compassion? Show gratitude.
By that argument, everyone should just STFU whenever one party with the fattest "badge of dishonor" by being the most aggrieved people enter the room.

22 kids die from free school lunch poisonings in NE India, but since I'm in Syria and have suffered more that entitles me to tell them to fuck off with their petty concerns and listen to me instead?

That I agree with, but saying it's a vicious way of passing a message is really out of place. Caring about the situation of others and its own (by promoting it, in this case), are not exclusive and that's the important thing. In both cases you're also standing behind the same principle.
Syrians have zero skin in the game. The only reason to bring it up is to use a dead kid to help sell their political cause.

Politicians do that and we call them heartless weasels. But if a bunch of grungy-looking participants in a civil war in another country do it with a banner to get attention, they get a free pass?

Neither side of the Syrian civil war has any moral right to claim a dead kid's memory in another country as a sleazy means of promoting their personal causes. Just as it would be inappropriate and sleazy for a bunch of street protestors in Oakland over the Martin case to brandish a poster of Muhammad al-Durrah to tell Palestinians to support their cause.

This is a problem. The rich people can create their own protectionism, but people will just say it's natural like Deneb just said. But when the government tries to solve the problem, the same people will cry about Socialism and that the government are taking away their freedom
Oooh, that's good. And true. :)
 

Zé Tahir

JhoolayLaaaal!
Moderator
Dec 10, 2004
29,281
This is a problem. The rich people can create their own protectionism, but people will just say it's natural like Deneb just said. But when the government tries to solve the problem, the same people will cry about Socialism and that the government are taking away their freedom
The government shouldn't have to solve the problem, the citizens should wake the fuck up and realize they're being systematically held back but they get to make choices just like everyone else.
 

GordoDeCentral

Diez
Moderator
Apr 14, 2005
70,780
Being a gang banger is definitely for the lazy people :tup:

what happens inside is what really matters, mental laziness is what is referenced here. Letting yourself become a "victim" and get caught up in the path that was "drawn" for you is laziness in a society that provides you with enough opportunities to escape destructive behavior. Are there some clinical cases? sure, but i dont think we give humans enough credit when it comes to overcoming adversity.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 20)