As Hydde said, all this polytride (a neologism I have just created, designating a diatribe involving more than two persons) started with me reacting to a succession of messages posted by Liliana on the subject of Milan's Austerlitz the other night. Hence, I feel I should throw my two cents.
Perhaps due to the punch-in-the-face effect that that game has had on me, I now realize that I may have reacted in a somewhat cold and abrupt way to Liliana's comments, but I don't think I ever crossed the lines of correctness by telling her to fvck off and the likes, and on the whole, I still stand by what I said, which in substance was asking her what Milan had done to deserve this humiliation and how this suddenly made them the ultimate losers.
Liliana refused to respond, because, as she put it, she was anticipating a fight. Well, I understand that she may have had a few heated discussions in the past with some members of the community and wishes to avoid them in the future, but 1) I had no intention to start a fight in the first place, merely a discussion 2) if she does not want people to react to her posts, let alone "gangbang her", she should try to be a little bit more moderate in expressing her opinions.
Regarding the "ignore" feature, I think it's great to have it as an option, because although anyone should have the right to talk, not everyone should have the obligation to listen. But I personally would resort to it only in very extreme cases, like if I run into, say, some pedophile or nazi moron flooding the forum with his slogans. Not in this case, thus.