The worst player of the season (8 Viewers)

Who is our worst player of the season?

  • Molinaro

  • Nocerino


Results are only viewable after voting.

DiDoz

Senior Member
Jun 23, 2007
508
#61
I understand what you're talking about Andy, you mean the wost performance not the most disappointing

We all agree that Molinaro sucks, but he and Molinaro play in different posistions

Molinaro plays as a LB, in a weak defence, where the other defenders try hard to cover their own mistakes, so nobody covers him, and you call him responsible for any mistake at the left

While Tiago plays in the center, with Sissoko / Zanetti do the DM job, and Camo/Nedved do the attacking part, so all he has to do is take the ball from the DM and pass it to the attackers, that's why I always feel that we're missing a player in the midfield whenever he plays and that's why we're complaining about lack of creativity in the midfield

to really judge Tiago, compare between our performance when he plays and when Camo plays in the middle...........HUGE difference
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,112
#63
I understand what you're talking about Andy, you mean the wost performance not the most disappointing

We all agree that Molinaro sucks, but he and Molinaro play in different posistions

Molinaro plays as a LB, in a weak defence, where the other defenders try hard to cover their own mistakes, so nobody covers him, and you call him responsible for any mistake at the left

While Tiago plays in the center, with Sissoko / Zanetti do the DM job, and Camo/Nedved do the attacking part, so all he has to do is take the ball from the DM and pass it to the attackers, that's why I always feel that we're missing a player in the midfield whenever he plays and that's why we're complaining about lack of creativity in the midfield

to really judge Tiago, compare between our performance when he plays and when Camo plays in the middle...........HUGE difference
But you're still not making any sense. You're using other players to evaluate the play of one player, not dissecting what the player did on his lonesome.

Apparently nobody watched any matches in October where we won comfortably and Tiago started and had assists in both matches. But what the hell, people don't remember that.
 

DiDoz

Senior Member
Jun 23, 2007
508
#64
I stopped reading after the first lines. Tiago was supposed to lead the midfield in your opinion?

That just goes to show you don't have a clue what you're talking about and never really knew who Tiago was before he came here. Tiago isn't the Nedved, Gerrard, futuristic leader type. Anybody who thought/thinks this obviously doesn't know anything about Tiago, someone who works hard as hell for his teamates and doesn't want the limelight. Ask any true Chelsea fan or Lyon fan about Tiago, and they'll not only know more about the player than you, but also respect him. This player was always a great setup man who could provide fluidity to our midfield, but not amazing leadership. Not every good player is a leader, you know.
I'm fed up with you aggressive tone, if you didnt finish reading my post don't quote it

If he's not supposed to lead the center filed why did we pay all this money to get him, and who will lead then? Giannichedda??

You know what, I dont have a clue about anything, and you're right about everything, you won!!!
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,112
#65
I'm fed up with you aggressive tone, if you didnt finish reading my post don't quote it

If he's not supposed to lead the center filed why did we pay all this money to get him, and who will lead then? Giannichedda??

You know what, I dont have a clue about anything, and you're right about everything, you won!!!
But why on EARTH would you expect Tiago to lead the midfield? He was never that sort of player. We spent at least twice as much for Nedved as well... wouldn't he still be the leader according to your logic?

That's why I don't really understand what you're talking about. But hey, perhaps I'm mentally retarded and not proficient in the English language.
 
Aug 1, 2003
17,696
#68
HE TRIES SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

HARD!
he does. and sometimes (lol) it pays off. nocerino, during his decline, is nothing but pure crap and gives the ball away in midfield, almost always resulting in a difficult situation for us. at least molinaro had some good runs down the left flank.
 

Marko

GhostDog
May 1, 2006
3,289
#69
Molinaro, although he's good defender and unfortunately seems to me that he can't improve his offensive playing. Nocerino had good start of the season but disappointed in second part. If I have to choose between these two it would be Nocerino, but that doesn't mean that I wouldn't like to see new left back next season.
 

Esteban

Senior Member
Mar 6, 2005
5,365
#70
Nocerino without doubt. He looked good in pre season and he came with some hype, but in reality he was a joke. He will be found in Empoli or Palermo for the remainder of his career.
 

Mike-e-y

Senior Member
Jul 18, 2004
11,188
#71
If we are talking about worst player then its molinaro by far and away i dont care how hard he tried he was still absolutely appauling both defensively and offensively. he only had 1 decent game and he looked average then, the guy cant pass, he cant cross, he cant run with the ball, he has shocking positioning and he is clumsy in defence. This guy sohuldnt even be a starter in serie C let alone A, the sooner we ship this bum out the better.

Nocerino was absolutely awful as well but at least the kid wasnt the reason we dropped so many points and apart from his stupid shots from 50 yards on the volley he seems to realise his limits, unlike molinaro who thinks he's ronaldo.

If we are talking about biggest disapointment then i would say all of secco's transfers: Molinaro, Almiron, Tiago, Nocerino and Criscito. But most of all I would say Andrade, someone who only played 15 minutes of football for £10m and high wages is the biggest disappointment in my eyes, at least the others were better value for money. What has even happened to Andrade? I thought he was only supposed to be out for 6 months? I haven't heard anything about him since that injury?
 

Nenz

Senior Member
Apr 17, 2008
10,472
#74
serious? He was fairly consistent through out the season and had an awesome game where he scored once and made an awesome pass to trez who scored off it. So thats an example of how good he can be. But through out the season he didn't do too badly.
Molinaro! Everytime the ball comes to him i shit my pants...he's so clumsy in defence, its really very traumatic for me and probably most Juventini
 

Azzurri7

Pinturicchio
Moderator
Dec 16, 2003
72,692
#78
Between Nocerino and Molinaro.... I'll take Molinaro anyday anytime, though he almost caused me a heart attack this season, but Nocerino is just useless.
 

Marc

Softcore Juventino
Jul 14, 2006
21,649
#79
Andy, cut the crap. Tiago was one big load of shite. Stop making excuses for him. At least Molinaro offered something in attack throughout the whole season. Tiago was always a ghost on the pitch. I'm tired of that player who gets so much defending after being completely worthless for us.
 

tibike

Senior Member
Dec 11, 2007
1,147
#80
Andy, cut the crap. Tiago was one big load of shite. Stop making excuses for him. At least Molinaro offered something in attack throughout the whole season. Tiago was always a ghost on the pitch. I'm tired of that player who gets so much defending after being completely worthless for us.
What did Molinaro offer in attack? His shitty passes or even shittier crosses? Or the completely-out-of-his-mind forward runs, which were a guaranteed loss of the ball? Excuse me, but I'd rather take the "ghost", who had at least one good through pass every match he played in.

And why don't you apply your last sentence on Molinaro?
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 8)