Most telling, he is a good AM, and currently in our 4-2-3-1 formation, if you see Gio, Diego and Camo as the starters, the players who have been backup for these players are respectively De Ceglie, Tiago and Poulsen So having an actual additional decent AM in this squad, would be MORE then useful.
Because I want to get rid of Tiago, Poulsen and their wages and replace them with better and younger players that make less money. Momo, Melo, Marchisio and 2 others choosing between Marrone, Ekdal, Mou. Sissoko/Kacar...I don't see a problem there.
Agree, with the Tiago and Poulsen sale. Kacar and Mou Sissoko is a different kind of CM than Marchisio, Momo, and Melo. Both of them is box to box MC who have the eye for goal. I will add more dimension for Ferrara. But i don't think they will come cheap. MC also our last priority for next season. I think Candreva will do just good as alternative.
Is Dominguez can play as AMR like Camo? If Ferrara stick to the 4-2-3-1, Dominguez will be very useful for us. And he come for free. I believe he will success. Playing in Russian League and bring the unknown team before like Rubin Kazan become Russian champion is not easy, and Dominguez is one of their key performer.
Dominguez? I don't see what could we loose if he can play RM and is free, it's just youtube but it looks that he has good technical abilities and is very fast.
As for CB position I still prefer Kjaer but what's with Genoa and all these good young defenders: Bocchetti, Ranocchia.. TBH I haven't seen either of them much, so who would you prefer considering that they have huge difference in height and playing style.
Kjaer for sure since he has been awesome for the past two years, Ranocchia has been better than Bocchetti this season IMO but he is still largely unproven with only about 10 or 11 Serie A games in his career. A lot will depend upon if Ranocchia can continue his great form for the whole season
You never know with secco, he did talk about many players been close and nothing happens at the end.
If Dominguez is indeed a AM then we really need the guy. We can't go on for the rest of the season playing 4-2-3-1 formation without backups to our AM's....
Chamakh is simply not good enough. He'd be a great signing for a Tottenham or a Sunderland. Not for Arsenal, Juve, Man Utd etc.
Like you said his end product is lacking, he is not a great finisher nor is he a great striker. He is quick, he's strong in the air and he's good at holding the ball up, but thats about it.
Chamakh is simply not good enough. He'd be a great signing for a Tottenham or a Sunderland. Not for Arsenal, Juve, Man Utd etc.
Like you said his end product is lacking, he is not a great finisher nor is he a great striker. He is quick, he's strong in the air and he's good at holding the ball up, but thats about it.
Chamakh is simply not good enough. He'd be a great signing for a Tottenham or a Sunderland. Not for Arsenal, Juve, Man Utd etc.
Like you said his end product is lacking, he is not a great finisher nor is he a great striker. He is quick, he's strong in the air and he's good at holding the ball up, but thats about it.