The truth about Beijing Olympics (18 Viewers)

Apr 12, 2004
77,165
The truth about the Beijing Olympics is most nations are going not to compete, but to steal the children to bring them back to their home nations to give them less pay for their manual labor, but at least give them a better life.

The truth about the Beijing Olympics is most are there to steal China's oil.

The truth about the Beijing Olympics is most are going to see how they should not live.

The truth about the Beijing Olympics is most are attempting to take a vacation because Iraq wasn't militaristic enough for them.

The truth about the Beijing Olympics is it fucking sucks.
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,127
The truth about the Beijing Olympics is there will be aftershocks from the latest earthquake to hit the region, even in August, so nobody should risk their lives going there this summer.
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,127
Double posting means that you post the same stuff twice, not post different things within the same thread. If that was the case, everyone could be banned.
 
Apr 12, 2004
77,165
No, double posting is posting twice in a row without reason to do such, a reason would be to quote two posts, but we have Multiquote now so that isn't even a reason.

Trust me, I just talked to Nas on the phone for 20 minutes and he confirmed that.


PS - If you didn't know, Ze's real name is Nasir.
 

Zé Tahir

JhoolayLaaaal!
Moderator
Dec 10, 2004
29,281
ßöмßäяðîëя;1641479 said:
No, double posting is posting twice in a row without reason to do such, a reason would be to quote two posts, but we have Multiquote now so that isn't even a reason.

Trust me, I just talked to Nas on the phone for 20 minutes and he confirmed that.


PS - If you didn't know, Ze's real name is Nasir.
:agree:

ps: Nas, Nasir, Tizzle, Ta', Tahiti, Nasse...all names I've been called
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,127
Well, then if so, Tahir should have rightfully handed out about 5000 cards for that then. Mods even "double post" for that matter. Just another moronic rule that is always broken yet nobody cares. You and I double post all the time and we were never warned for it.

EDIT: If that's what the actual double posting rule is all about.
 
Apr 12, 2004
77,165
Well, then if so, Tahir should have rightfully handed out about 5000 cards for that then. Mods even "double post" for that matter. Just another moronic rule that is always broken yet nobody cares. You and I double post all the time and we were never warned for it.

EDIT: If that's what the actual double posting rule is all about.
Well it's not worth a warning unless it's out of order, which what I did with 5 posts was.

Ohh, and I was warned for it.
 

Zé Tahir

JhoolayLaaaal!
Moderator
Dec 10, 2004
29,281
Well, then if so, Tahir should have rightfully handed out about 5000 cards for that then. Mods even "double post" for that matter. Just another moronic rule that is always broken yet nobody cares. You and I double post all the time and we were never warned for it.
Why do you have to question every little thing I do? I thought we were past this crap. I already talked to Burke about this and considering you have nothing to do with this I really don't see why you're whining.

FYI, I don't ever warn people for double posting, whether it's the same post twice or posting twice consecutively because the former is almost always out of the persons hand due to internet problems or server problems and the latter because I really don't care to warn someone for something petty like that, but posting consecutively 4x+ is unnecessary and there's no excuse for it unless you're a newbie and don't have a clue about the rules or the multiquote system.

Now back to Entourage :claire:
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,127
Why do you have to question every little thing I do? I thought we were past this crap. I already talked to Burke about this and considering you have nothing to do with this I really don't see why you're whining.

FYI, I don't ever warn people for double posting, whether it's the same post twice or posting twice consecutively because the former is almost always out of the persons hand due to internet problems or server problems and the latter because I really don't care to warn someone for something petty like that, but posting consecutively 4x+ is unnecessary and there's no excuse for it unless you're a newbie and don't have a clue about the rules or the multiquote system.

Now back to Entourage :claire:
I'm not whining about it because I didn't do it. I'm just making a point.

And I'm glad to see you don't warn people for that. That's all that counts. :tup:

EDIT: Ohh wait, you did apparently. Hmm.
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,127
I'm cool. I just find that rule to be wrong, thats all. People break it all the time and in reality I don't really see what's the problem about you or I making 5 posts consecutively within the same thread as long as they address different matters. This place didn't always have the multiquote function capability.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 18)