The Trouble With…Chelsea (1 Viewer)

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,530
#81
++ [ originally posted by Blandest ] ++
Anyways like I said, im done with this. Maybe ask someone who knows what they are talking about (you dont) to reply to someone who cares about this in anyway (I dont) and you can jump in with a few completely crap opinions then.
Crap opinion? Not really, as it's fairly obvious that Chelsea would not be successful without Abramovich. Of course I am not that well informed on the players and how they were taken by clubs in the 1920's. It's obvious that the business has changed in the past 85 years and I highly doubt that good players were worth the same proportion as today and were binded by the same contractual agreements. Again, not at all the same as today with Chelsea, being able to basically buy whoever they want because money is not an object, unlike Juventus of the 20's.
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,530
#83
++ [ originally posted by Blandest ] ++


I proved you dont have a very sound knowledge of the history of your own club. I also proved the point I made in Nicks thread, the medium of the internet cant be trusted as knowledge. That is not my knowledge at all, (though I remembered about fiats involvment from reading about it years ago somewhere), but no different than the 'great' members of this forum post except they might be assed to reword it.
That is a rather bold statement, don't you think? Sorry that I did not know the exact DATE of which Fiat took over Juventus. And actually we were successful before Fiat came around because we did win the Italian title in the first few years of the 20th Century. So I was correct in that statement.

I only find it alittle rich for Juve fans to bash Chelsea all considering. Its hypocritical and the actions of fucktards. Point made.
You can call me a fvcktard for that, I don't care. It still does not take away from the fact that without Abramovich, Chelsea would not be in the same position as today. That is my view, one which you did not like hearing for some reason. Who cares? Well obviously you do.
 

Turdhead

Chickenegro no funny
Jan 14, 2005
3,106
#85
++ [ originally posted by Andy ] ++
You can call me a fvcktard for that, I don't care. It still does not take away from the fact that without Abramovich, Chelsea would not be in the same position as today. That is my view, one which you did not like hearing for some reason. Who cares? Well obviously you do.
Exactly. Who the hell even disagreed that for a moment? **** im never discussing something with you again, you change around that much its hard to keep up and you never actually make or answer ANY points.

And what you jsut said. EXACTLY the same can be said about Juventus and Agnelli. EXACTLY. Want me to do it for you?

++ [ originally posted by Blandest ] ++
It still does not take away from the fact that without Agnelli, Juventus would not be in the same position as today.
I couldnt give a shit about your football knowledge, I couldnt give a shit about chelsea and I couldnt give a shit about Juve. I just dont like to see people being naive, dumb and hypocritical. Why I call you a fucktard is because you act and post like one.

Fucktard, fucktard, fucktard!
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,530
#86
++ [ originally posted by Blandest ] ++


Exactly. Who the hell even disagreed that for a moment? **** im never discussing something with you again, you change around that much its hard to keep up and you never actually make or answer ANY points.
Oh no, I am so heartbroken. Please Claire, say it ain't so.. :touched:

I couldnt give a shit about your football knowledge, I couldnt give a shit about chelsea and I couldnt give a shit about Juve. I just dont like to see people being naive, dumb and hypocritical. Why I call you a fucktard is because you act and post like one.

Fucktard, fucktard, fucktard!
Oh man I love starting worthless arguements like this. I find it very intriguing. :D
 

JCK

Biased
JCK
May 11, 2004
125,413
#88
++ [ originally posted by Andy ] ++


Yeah I always liked JFH. I hated seeing him leave Chelsea because he deserved to stay. Another reason of mine to hate that club now...
me too, actually the whole Abramo thing made me hate the club and on top of it is the arrival of that prick Mouri....I used to love the club at the times of Zola and the Italian connection
 

Turdhead

Chickenegro no funny
Jan 14, 2005
3,106
#89
++ [ originally posted by Andy ] ++


Oh no, I am so heartbroken. Please Claire, say it ain't so.. :touched:



Oh man I love starting worthless arguements like this. I find it very intriguing. :D
Not an argument whatsoever. Though you sure took some hard hits :howler:

Infact now you look kinda like a .....




















fucktard
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,530
#90
++ [ originally posted by Jeeks ] ++


me too, actually the whole Abramo thing made me hate the club and on top of it is the arrival of that prick Mouri....I used to love the club at the times of Zola and the Italian connection
Same here my friend. After Abramovich took over I started to hate that club, just like the rest of them. It's a shame that had to happen.
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,530
#91
++ [ originally posted by Blandest ] ++


Not an argument whatsoever. Though you sure took some hard hits :howler:

Infact now you look kinda like a .....




fucktard
I did not take any hard hits at all. I just love going off about English clubs because I hate them all. :LOL:
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,530
#94
++ [ originally posted by Blandest ] ++


sure you didnt f*tard.
Um not really. I said Chelsea would not be successful without Abramovich, and I am right. You said Juventus would not be successful without Fiat and the Agnelli family, and you are right. I said that both situations are not the same because players were easier to obtain back then while it takes much more money nowadays to do business, which Chelsea has an abundance of; and I am right.

This is why I labelled this banter a "worthless arguement." :LOL:
 

Turdhead

Chickenegro no funny
Jan 14, 2005
3,106
#95
++ [ originally posted by Andy ] ++


Um not really. I said Chelsea would not be successful without Abramovich, and I am right. You said Juventus would not be successful without Fiat and the Agnelli family, and you are right. I said that both situations are not the same because players were easier to obtain back then while it takes much more money nowadays to do business, which Chelsea has an abundance of; and I am right.

This is why I labelled this banter a "worthless arguement." :LOL:
No you said Chelsea are buying trophies. Thats my whole friggin point. You lose I win. Admit your defeat and you and seven can start to rebuild together.
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,530
#96
++ [ originally posted by Blandest ] ++


No you said Chelsea are buying trophies. Thats my whole friggin point. You lose I win. Admit your defeat and you and seven can start to rebuild together.

Yes that is what I said Claire, Chelsea are buying titles. You said Juventus did the same thing, and I responded saying "not to the same extreme as Chelsea."

All of this has to be taken into consideration with my passion for hating English clubs. :LOL:
 

Turdhead

Chickenegro no funny
Jan 14, 2005
3,106
#97
I hate americans, I hate hypocites and I hate blonde people like Emma. That hasnt messed up my arguments :stuckup:

Forget it though ****tard, next time ill leave this EPL discussion to you pack of deadbeats to masturbate over.
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,530
#98
++ [ originally posted by Blandest ] ++
I hate americans, I hate hypocites and I hate blonde people like Emma. That hasnt messed up my arguments :stuckup:
Now I know that is not entirely true...




You like Emma.

Forget it though ****tard, next time ill leave this EPL discussion to you pack of deadbeats to masturbate over.
Oh if the world could only know where my disinchantment stems from, maybe they could see the light and start to understand me..
 

Fred

Senior Member
Oct 2, 2003
41,113
#99
Chelsea buying titles?oh come on Andy its not like they've been paying referees like your lads did.

i dont know how you can consider buying World class players to win trophies as "buying trophies",sure Chelsea without Abrahmovic is nothing but theres nothing wrong with that,i hate the way Chelsea buys players too,but its not against the rules is it?
 
Sep 28, 2002
13,975
++ [ originally posted by Andy ] ++

You can call me a fvcktard for that, I don't care. It still does not take away from the fact that without Abramovich, Chelsea would not be in the same position as today. Who cares? Well obviously you do.
of course they wouldnt. they would be in position of leeds united
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)