The Trouble With…Chelsea (1 Viewer)

Turdhead

Chickenegro no funny
Jan 14, 2005
3,106
#61
++ [ originally posted by Andy ] ++


Selling our best player Zidane to Real Madrid "bought" us two titles. :howler:
Why have you quoted yourself? I was asking sarcastically.

Are you getting mixed up. YOUR the one talking about buying titles here. I would never think that for a minute unless someone was paying referees and smaller teams. Thats buying titles. Jesus youd think Juve fans would know that :howler:

You are a fucktard.
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,530
#64
++ [ originally posted by Blandest ] ++

You didnt answer the question about Juve. Didnt those good chaps at Fiat revolutionalise Juve once upon a time?
"Revolutionalise?" We were successful even before Fiat came into the picture. Besides, they did not pump in millions or thousands of dollors for just transfers alone. The game back then was very different from today.
 
Jan 7, 2004
29,704
#67
++ [ originally posted by Blandest ] ++


Has that happened?

This guy drives as hard a bargain today as he ever did.


Noones denying Chelsea have financial power. But buying titles? Suure.

You didnt answer the question about Juve. Didnt those good chaps at Fiat revolutionalise Juve once upon a time?

i got another word for you. money laundry
 

Turdhead

Chickenegro no funny
Jan 14, 2005
3,106
#69
++ [ originally posted by Andy ] ++
We were successful even before Fiat came into the picture.
Hardly.

From this very site:
From 1905 until 1926, they couldn't get the title because the other team like Inter Milan, Casale e Pro Vercelli, AC Milan, which was the greatest team, at that time.But, after that, they gave no chances for the other.

In 24 July 1923, Agnelli family gained partnership with Edoardo, father of Giovanni and Umberto. Eduardo was the son of Fiat owner. Eduardo, the, take the position of president from Corrado Corradini.
Sounds to me like a revolution.

You might want to ask Paul. Unfortunately I didnt study this subject and im not here to educate you.
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,530
#70
++ [ originally posted by Blandest ] ++
Sounds to me like a revolution.

You might want to ask Paul. Unfortunately I didnt study this subject and im not here to educate you.
We might not have been that successful during the specified time period, but we were not buying players and coaches like they were going out of style. Like I said its not the same thing by any stretch of the imagination.
 

Turdhead

Chickenegro no funny
Jan 14, 2005
3,106
#73
++ [ originally posted by Andy ] ++
We might not have been that successful, but we were not buying players and coaches like they were going out of style. Like I said its not the same thing by any stretch of the imagination.
Edoardo Agnelli, son of the FIAT founder, was elected the new president of the club and due to the growing number of fans, Juventus took possession of a bigger stadium in Marsiglia Road. Jeno Karoly, the first real trainer, arrived at Juventus with the inside left Hirzer, both from Hungary, to supplement the talents of Combi, Rosetta, Munerati, Bigatto and Grabbi. In 1925-26, after a fascinating run-in, Juventus won their second championship.

1 new coach, 1 new player + a new stadium.
2 years later winning the championship. Just like Chelsea. 2 years later perhaps they can win.
Time to buy some more players:
In this glorious period Juventus won five consecutive championships.

Trainer Carlo Carcano was able to call upon great stars such as Orsi, Caligaris, Monti, Cesarini, Varglien, Bertolini, Ferrari and Borel. Not only did Juve triumph in five championships from 1930 to 1935, the Italian national side also won the World Cup in 1934.
8 'great stars' puchased. Thats then, when alot less players were bought than modern day.

Chelsea havent won anything in two years. Perhaps in 10 years they will win 6 championships.

Chelsea are doing it faster (or are they?). Welcome to the 21st century FUCKTARD.
 

Turdhead

Chickenegro no funny
Jan 14, 2005
3,106
#74
++ [ originally posted by Bürke ] ++


Dude, lyrics aren't music.
Is this music?


Blandie has kicked enough ass tonight, going to watch 'the village'. Educate yourselves, a girl who knows little about football and nothing about Juve has made you look like a couple of 'american idiots'. Opps I know about music either.
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,530
#75
++ [ originally posted by Blandest ] ++


8 'great stars' puchased. Thats then, when alot less players were bought than modern day.

Chelsea havent won anything in two years. Perhaps in 10 years they will win 6 championships.

Chelsea are doing it faster (or are they?). Welcome to the 21st century FUCKTARD.
Still not the same thing, at all. The players came to the club because of the great reputation of the "trainer." I would like to see the financial details on all those "transactions." :howler:

Not the same thing at all Claire. Try harder.
 

Turdhead

Chickenegro no funny
Jan 14, 2005
3,106
#76
++ [ originally posted by Andy ] ++


Still not the same thing, at all. The players came to the club because of the great reputation of the "trainer." I would like to see the financial details on all those "transactions." :howler:

Not the same thing at all Claire. Try harder.
Yeah im sure there was no money involved at all. Im sure that trainer just decided he'd do a ****ing rocky and take a no hoper team and turn them into the strongest in Italy. This isnt hollywood Andy.

**** I need to Laugh Out Loud.





:LOL:

Anyways like I said, im done with this. Maybe ask someone who knows what they are talking about (you dont) to reply to someone who cares about this in anyway (I dont) and you can jump in with a few completely crap opinions then.
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,530
#77
++ [ originally posted by Blandest ] ++


Blandie has kicked enough ass tonight, going to watch 'the village'. Educate yourselves, a girl who knows little about football and nothing about Juve has made you look like a couple of 'american idiots'. Opps I know about music either.
All you proved is that you can search a website. Good job. If you do not realize the difference between these situations then you are an idiot. The difference in the financial aspects and the reasons behind the players coming to each team are very extreme. Not the same situation at all, however I can see where you could relate the two. Not as close as you think though.

All of this does not take away from the fact that Chelsea are buying success. :howler:
 

Turdhead

Chickenegro no funny
Jan 14, 2005
3,106
#79
++ [ originally posted by Andy ] ++


All you proved is that you can search a website. Good job. If you do not realize the difference between these situations then you are an idiot. The difference in the financial aspects and the reasons behind the players coming to each team are very extreme. Not the same situation at all, however I can see where you could relate the two. Not as close as you think though.
I proved you dont have a very sound knowledge of the history of your own club. I also proved the point I made in Nicks thread, the medium of the internet cant be trusted as knowledge. That is not my knowledge at all, (though I remembered about fiats involvment from reading about it years ago somewhere), but no different than the 'great' members of this forum post except they might be assed to reword it.

Of course I realise the difference. Maybe you dont realise the difference in time. How can you compare financial deals from 1925 to financial deals today. How can you even compare it at all? What Chelsea have done is nothing more than a modern version of what Juve did and many teams have done. It takes money or something big to make a team successful. The full Juventus Story, all the talk and claims that surround this club from paying off referees, to deals with other clubs, to dirty dealings, to a monopoly over clubs to drug incidents make what you and others post about chelsea laughable. Juventus are FAR from the glorious perfect success story you think.

I only find it alittle rich for Juve fans to bash Chelsea all considering. Its hypocritical and the actions of fucktards. Point made.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)