++ [ originally posted by Gandalf ] ++
come on guys.. it's not that bad.. the TROTK is one of the best movies I've seen this year.. actually, it is the best movie in 2003.. can you think of a better movie..? the matrix..? master & commander..? come on..!!
in addition, Peter jackson deserves something for his work on this great epic.. he maybe didn't follow what the books said exactly, but still the outcome was three great movies.. one of the trilogy I've ever seen in my life..
it's hard for J.R.R. Tolkien's fans (as myself) who have read the books to accept these changes, that what happens when you know a story and the ending of it, then you see a movie about..
and yeah, the ROTK is the best movie in 2003 and deserves the oscar for best picture.. and it will get it.. IMO.
Hey Gandalf, how ya doin' guy?
Hmm...best movie? in what respect?...only decent acting performance was from yourself Sir.
Editing...poor to say the least...one minute they are fighting the battle of Pelanor Fields before Minas Tirith, cut to aftermath, cut to room inside MT, cut to before the Black Gates...no continuity, no expalnation of what was going on, especially if you hadn't read the book...and what about Frodo and Sam in Mordor, more of the same...you don't win a best picture Oscar for editing of this kind. Nor for such dreadful acting and script. Perhaps the extended version would be better, but that won't be considered...we are talking about the Oscar here after all...:down:
As for changes from the book...as you know, most people wont read the book, and assume this is the real LOTR. So sad, and an injustice to the written word.
The special effects were wonderful, as were the cinematography, sets, wordrobe and so on.
But for the Oscar, thinking solely about the things the Academy would look at, it falls far short of the qualities that best picture requires...but it will probably win due to pressure within the industry
But hey...let's not fall out over it
