The purpose of this thread was to indicate the fallacies of ethical relativism. I will reserve the discussion of objective morality to another day. Heres another flaw by the way.
If we reject the theist basis of morality, we are left with subjective relativism. And what we call murder is committed in many many ways in the animal kingdom. We cannot tell the lion is wrong to commit murder of another animal - the lion doesn't even understand what right and wrong are.
If we reject the theist basis of morality, we are left with subjective relativism. And what we call murder is committed in many many ways in the animal kingdom. We cannot tell the lion is wrong to commit murder of another animal - the lion doesn't even understand what right and wrong are.
and there is no such a thing as "theist basis of morality". Creator god is a personal god, ie every theist makes up what that god is as he goes along according to his/hers preferences. No objectivity whatsoever.
Buy on AliExpress.com