The Moral Law. Ratonality of Faith (3 Viewers)
- Thread starter rounder
- Start date
Okay, the Romans may have been okay with it. As are Americans when they kill innocent civillians in Iraq, at least they aren't American, right? That's simply irrelevant though. Regardless of how some people feel about it, it's still wrong. If I think Terrorism is justified and morally sound, it doesn't make it correct. It will always be immoral no matter what anyone thinks.
That's not quite the point. Let me clarify, I am not asking whether or not rape was considered moral, I am asking whether or not rape was moral.
That's not quite the point. Let me clarify, I am not asking whether or not rape was considered moral, I am asking whether or not rape was moral.
Well yeah, those are the ones that bee logically reasoned without using the R word, which turns 'morals' into something suprahuman 
Don't you think this will have seriously dangerous implications? Hitler and the Nazi's believed the Holocaust was perfectly moral, who are we to say it wasn't. Since there is no absolute standard we apply to, nothing can really be deemed as moral or immoral, it is merely a matter of personal choice or taste.
I find this rather ridiculous for some reason.
Fred,
if you really, really want me to explain why I think Hitler didn't believe it was moral, I will, but it might be a long story.
The logic does have dangerous implications, but moral is a dangerous thing. It is not flawed though. You show me ONE error in that logic. In fact it's the only possible logic here. Look, I know you're a muslim and all, but deep down you know religion is a manmade product. Hell, I'm not even saying there is no God, but Islam has been, at the very least, influenced by man. Ultimately the humanists did have a point: it all boils down to man himself.
if you really, really want me to explain why I think Hitler didn't believe it was moral, I will, but it might be a long story.
The logic does have dangerous implications, but moral is a dangerous thing. It is not flawed though. You show me ONE error in that logic. In fact it's the only possible logic here. Look, I know you're a muslim and all, but deep down you know religion is a manmade product. Hell, I'm not even saying there is no God, but Islam has been, at the very least, influenced by man. Ultimately the humanists did have a point: it all boils down to man himself.
If you've got the time in your hands, then by all means do. I'm interested to know why you think he thought it was immoral. In fact he really believed he was doing his race a favor by eliminating the jews from Germany
But going by that logic Seven then i can conclude that laws in Saudi Arabia like forbidding women from driving are moral. Because most Saudi's are convinced that it is not moral for a woman to be driving a car and walking in the street without a veil. Using your logic, it is moral because it is widely accepted by the Saudi people, right?
But going by that logic Seven then i can conclude that laws in Saudi Arabia like forbidding women from driving are moral. Because most Saudi's are convinced that it is not moral for a woman to be driving a car and walking in the street without a veil. Using your logic, it is moral because it is widely accepted by the Saudi people, right?