++ [ originally posted by baggio ] ++
Ferrari is all about passion. Their choice of drivers reflect that. Montoya is just as arrogant and agressive as Schumacher was in his heyday, but the comparison doesnt end there. Yes, he is also inconsistent, but I dont know if he deserves to carry all the blame for that. There has been more than one occasion that his car has let him down, be it at Williams, his first season especially and a couple of races with McLaren this year.
Ferrari is all about passion. Their choice of drivers reflect that. Montoya is just as arrogant and agressive as Schumacher was in his heyday, but the comparison doesnt end there. Yes, he is also inconsistent, but I dont know if he deserves to carry all the blame for that. There has been more than one occasion that his car has let him down, be it at Williams, his first season especially and a couple of races with McLaren this year.
Montoya never accepts responsibility for anything. He always tries to find someone else to blame for his misstakes, whether it's Monteiro or someone else. Frankly, he isnt nearly as fast as Kimi or maybe even Alonso, and I doubt he has the makings of a world champion. He's incosnistent, he whines, he makes silly misstakes and I strongly doubt he will ever drive for Ferrari.
++ [ originally posted by baggio ] ++
I think you're being biased in your views on Michael, because I think apart from the arrogance, agressiveness, he too had a certain reckless streak, and I strongly beg to differ as regards the Villeneuve incident, which was quite clearly Schumacher's mistake.
I think you're being biased in your views on Michael, because I think apart from the arrogance, agressiveness, he too had a certain reckless streak, and I strongly beg to differ as regards the Villeneuve incident, which was quite clearly Schumacher's mistake.
I'm not saying it wasnt his misstake, I'm just saying he wasnt reckless, becuae he did what he wanted to
++ [ originally posted by baggio ] ++
I dont think Michael is the gentleman he is made out to be. And when you say he was very professional in testing, races and car setup to enabel Ferarri do better. I really dont see why he should be praised for that given that the team was built around him and his needs, with a teammate to play support.
I dont think Michael is the gentleman he is made out to be. And when you say he was very professional in testing, races and car setup to enabel Ferarri do better. I really dont see why he should be praised for that given that the team was built around him and his needs, with a teammate to play support.
I do think he is. He might not have been at the beggining of his career, but he has calmed down over the years and played down the arrogancve. rarely will you ever hear him say something bad about the other drivers, about his car, teammate etc. And not to mention he gave 10 million $ for the tsunami victims out of his own pocket.
As far as the team is concerned, I think you are, like so many people, maiking a fundamental oversight. The team isnt build around Michael, Michael build the team. Fact is that there is no driver in the world that would have ben able to do what he did. When he came to Ferrari they were nowhere, decades without a title, not competing for victories, finishing 4th, 5th in the team standings. He came to ferrari and started winning right away. He took an extremely uncompetitive and unreliable car and drove it to victories, took the season to the very end every year. He was a huge part of making Ferrari what it is today, and IMO no other driver could pull off something similar. He made Ferrai champions, and I seriously doubt that Ferrari would have anywhere near as much success in the last few years had, for example, Mika, or Coulthard or jacques been driving for them. Michael built the team, and he's been there for almost 10 years. It's only logical that he will be the first driver.
++ [ originally posted by baggio ] ++
Kimi could be more likened to Mika. And as regards Alonso; its still too early to predict the similarity of his style to any champion. I'll conclude by saying Juan Pablo may not have all of Michael's talent but he has his temperament, one that will make him champion someday. His overall set of skills may not be as refined as those of Schumacher's is at this point of time, but I can assure you, experience is all he needs to even out those rough edges, which played no small part in bringing Michael to the fore, before he joined Ferrari.
Kimi could be more likened to Mika. And as regards Alonso; its still too early to predict the similarity of his style to any champion. I'll conclude by saying Juan Pablo may not have all of Michael's talent but he has his temperament, one that will make him champion someday. His overall set of skills may not be as refined as those of Schumacher's is at this point of time, but I can assure you, experience is all he needs to even out those rough edges, which played no small part in bringing Michael to the fore, before he joined Ferrari.
AS for Juan, I strongly doubt he will ever be champion. He doesnt have the midframe for it, and is not as fast as Kimi or Alonso, not to mention Michael. I'd put him together with Button in terms of speed. And TBH Juan has had plenty of experience. He joined Williams in 2001, this is already his 4th year in Formula 1. Schumacher already had 1 or 2 world titles by that time. How much experience does he need? He will never be nearly as good as Michael, and I simply dont and never will rate him highly. Nor his temperament.
