The Financial Situation (46 Viewers)

[piotrr]

Really no one wants to sponsor us even with Ronaldo?

Or do we own jeep so much we have to keep them on the shirts? Would be so many different ways to keep their funding and get a real shirt sponsor...

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[vodka]

47M Adidas (although I found it's 51M on some sites)
45M Jeep
10M Allianz
5M Cygames
----
107M/year from major sponsors

Is that correct?

- - - Updated - - -

Really no one wants to sponsor us even with Ronaldo?

Or do we own jeep so much we have to keep them on the shirts? Would be so many different ways to keep their funding and get a real shirt sponsor...

It would be nice to have Ferrari on the shirt, but the connection between it and Juve as a bit weak

 

[Salvo]

Ferrari have no need to sponsor anyone, we could have FIAT though

 

[PhRoZeN]

$45. That’s it?
How much do ManU, RM, Barca and BM make from their shirt sponsors?

Manunion £64m ($71m) from Chevrolet,
RM €70m from Fly Emirates
Barca €55m from Rakuten
Bayern €45m from Tmobile

Sent from my M2007J20CG using Tapatalk

 

[.zero]

Fiat sponsorship wouldn’t make sense from a business perspective.

If the club truly wants to make big sponsorship $$ then they need to find a sponsor that not only offers top $ but is also controversial and looking to enter/succeed in the Italian market for custody’s/users, etc.

for example - p.hub

they tried to hit naming rights to the arena in Miami but due to conservative mindsets the deal didn’t go thru.

Italy would burn to the ground if juve ✖️ PHub had a deal

 

[duranfj]

from 42 to 45m.

Add Covid fee and for me looks good

 

[Fab Fragment]

Doesn’t Amazon want to advertise in Italy?

 

[Salvo]

Fiat sponsorship wouldn’t make sense from a business perspective.

If the club truly wants to make big sponsorship $$ then they need to find a sponsor that not only offers top $ but is also controversial and looking to enter/succeed in the Italian market for custody’s/users, etc.

for example - p.hub

they tried to hit naming rights to the arena in Miami but due to conservative mindsets the deal didn’t go thru.

Italy would burn to the ground if juve PHub had a deal

 

[Turk_Bianconero]

i doubt jeep pay any money.

 

[s4tch]

47M Adidas (although I found it's 51M on some sites)
45M Jeep
10M Allianz
5M Cygames
----
107M/year from major sponsors

Is that correct?

cygames might pay a bit more than that: https://www.calcioefinanza.it/2020/07/08/juventus-valore-maglia-sponsor-cygames/ not sure about the conditions though. the adidas deal is widely reported to bring 51m

 

[Valerio.]

Adidas it's 51m+ addons based on sales and what's not.

 

[Elvin]

Fiat sponsorship wouldn’t make sense from a business perspective.

If the club truly wants to make big sponsorship $$ then they need to find a sponsor that not only offers top $ but is also controversial and looking to enter/succeed in the Italian market for custody’s/users, etc.

for example - p.hub

they tried to hit naming rights to the arena in Miami but due to conservative mindsets the deal didn’t go thru.

Italy would burn to the ground if juve ✖️ PHub had a deal

Speaking of pornhub, it is compeletely ruined. Due to some bullshit investigation PH removed all amateur content from the site, leaving only videos posted by professional/verified uploaders

 

[Knowah]

The logo is Jeep because its the most recognized brand globally that Fiat has I believe.

I know a few Jeep enthusiasts (yuck, yes, they exist in America and offroad like crazy) who have bought Juventus gear simply for the Jeep logo.

 

[Elvin]

The logo is Jeep because its the most recognized brand globally that Fiat has I believe.

I know a few Jeep enthusiasts (yuck, yes, they exist in America and offroad like crazy) who have bought Juventus gear simply for the Jeep logo.

Umm ever heard about Ferrari?

I know I know, it doesnt need advirtising.

 

[Knowah]

Umm ever heard about Ferrari?

I know I know, it doesnt need advirtising.

No, good point. The problem with Ferrari is it doesn't have that same "every man" lure that Jeep does comparatively. It's defnitely more luxury brand and although infinitely more recognizeable from a sporting perspective in Europe due to F1, it's known almost exclusively as a rapper or actor car brand in the US. Not saying the US is solely the reason but Jeep is recognizeable everywhere and has none of those connotations of luxury or high class.

 

[Martin]

Hello, analysts.

I'm reading the annual report and the biggest source of revenue, apparently, is Players' registration rights. What on earth is this??? What exactly is the revenue stream from having a bunch of signed contracts? Could this be revenue from sale of shirts?
EDIT: Found it in the notes. It's capital gains. Amounts to 172m for 19/20.


- - - Updated - - -

I also noticed there are 1.3bn shares outstanding. In the 2002 report there were 38.7m. That's a dilution rate of 20% per year or some such, wild!

 

[The Quazis]

Hello, analysts.

I'm reading the annual report and the biggest source of revenue, apparently, is Players' registration rights. What on earth is this??? What exactly is the revenue stream from having a bunch of signed contracts? Could this be revenue from sale of shirts?
EDIT: Found it in the notes. It's capital gains. Amounts to 172m for 19/20.


- - - Updated - - -

I also noticed there are 1.3bn shares outstanding. In the 2002 report there were 38.7m. That's a dilution rate of 20% per year or some such, wild!

The famous plusvalenza.

 

[Amer]

 

[edgardavids2608]

Speaking of pornhub, it is compeletely ruined. Due to some bullshit investigation PH removed all amateur content from the site, leaving only videos posted by professional/verified uploaders

Damn... Cant watch the child porn that had flooded it?

 

[jukazem]

Hello, analysts.

I'm reading the annual report and the biggest source of revenue, apparently, is Players' registration rights. What on earth is this??? What exactly is the revenue stream from having a bunch of signed contracts? Could this be revenue from sale of shirts?
EDIT: Found it in the notes. It's capital gains. Amounts to 172m for 19/20.

It's capital gains from asset disposal, shouldn't be classified as revenue (in the future atleast). Deloitte Football Money League always excludes it when they do the club-wise revenue comparison

IFRIC quoted paragraph 113 of IAS 38, which states: ‘The gain or loss arising from the derecognition of an intangible asset shall be determined as the difference between the net disposal proceeds if any and the carrying amount of the asset. It shall be recognised in profit or loss when the asset is derecognised… Gains shall not be classified as revenue.’

IFRIC decided that as the payment had been made in respect of extinguishing the registration right, it represented compensation for disposing of an intangible asset. Therefore neither the proceeds nor the gain on disposal could be recognised within revenue by applying IFRS 15.

https://cdn.ifrs.org/-/media/projec...ts/ias38-player-transfer-payments-june-20.pdf