Summer mercato thread 2017-18 (92 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

pitbull

Senior Member
Jul 26, 2007
11,045
I thought you said Matuidi won't bring us to Bayern and Real level, so why are you pissed we are failing to sign him?

Bayern have signed Goretzka as much as we have signed Matudi and if they had signed him, we have enough carpenters in the team.

And is that the same Tolisso we didn't sign because he showed nothing worth the 40m Lyon were asking and now Bayern signed him for close to 50m?
Because I think we need CM reinforcements that are clearly superior to our options, yet we can't even sign a short term option that improves us marginally.

I was under the impression Bayern got Goretzka, my bad.
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

Juliano13

Senior Member
May 6, 2012
5,017
Because I think we need CM reinforcements that are clearly superior to our options, yet we can't even sign a short term option that improves us marginally.

I was under the impression Bayern got Goretzka, my bad.
The reason we can't sign Matuidi is that PSG are Al Qaeda pieces of shit that hate us. We should have used Alves as a bargaining chip if we really want Matuidi.
 

Cronios

Juventolog
Jun 7, 2004
27,519
We don't need a CAM. Dybala is set in that role (basically a SS off Higuain), now we have Bernardeschi as well, and Pjanic who also played as more of an advanced MC-CAM at times.
Actually by that logic, we don't need anything, many of our players can play in more roles.
And truth to be told, we knew it all along, that's why we shouldnt opt for quantity over quality this summer...
But CAM is the least stacked position of our lot, the players you described are not CAMs, they can play there, but they can also play in their primary roles too.
Objectively we need a subber LB more than anything, because we only have an injury prone DM to cover that role.
The most easily upgradable position we have is the RB, as Licht is old with health issues and De Sciglio is mediocre.
As subber CF, Manzdu and Mean got it.
And after that, our least stacked position is CAM, Simply because it is a new need and the most stacked position is CM, because we had the biggest needs there and sold none.
I dont see the need to sign a CAM as a priority, but should we buy a new CM, his special characteristic s should be closer to a CAM, than a DM
 

Orgut

Senior Member
Dec 31, 2002
19,322
We don't need another box to box player, box to box players are all around players than can do both as you said, but the 4-2-3-1 cannot host them in the front 3. The side front 2 must be wide players, so that our formation doesn't choke in the middle, yet the position I called CAM and you called AMC, is not meant for a box to box player, because he will be covered by the two DMs behind him and will be flanked by the two wingers, this position will be charged to create chances, the final pass and many times even finish!
that's why we are using a SS, an AMF also fits, but we only have Bernar, who is primarily a winger and will be used as such, esp considering we need two. This is the position we don't have options.

The SMS characteristic s you have described can be found in abundance in our 8 CMs, would qualities a player like Magic would bring that are not already there. Better quality yes, but not different characteristic s.
Marchisio imo has more offensive characteristics than Magic, as he has a decent long shoot, Asamoah is fast and strong, Khedira more experienced and calm under pressure.
Unless we sell 2 at least of Sturaro, Lemina and Rincon, the last thing we need is yet another DM...


In our 3-5-2 formation, we used to stack CMs ,able to offer all-round performance and a lot of them, because we need 3 of them fielded at all times. They had the characteristic needed to complement each other.
Now we only need 2 of them and the player who plays ahead of them must have the offensive characteristics they don't have.Neither does Matic, or Matuidi...
The SMS characteristics can be found in many players but the quality is what matters... Kovacevic had probably the best headers I have ever seen + He didnt miss lots of chances yet he is nowhere near other players level who are worse finishers.. Its all about quality..
Marchisio was a box to box in the past but is now he is more of a DLP B2B combination - Also when Marchisio is on form he can definitely partner Pjanic even though he miss some of the characteristics I mentioned.. however Marchisio isnt as strong as SMS in headers or physical wise..
Khedira is ok but again SMS has more quality in what we need and much more room to improve over him..
Asamoah - I cant believe Im referring to him at all - This guy is finished - We should sell him asap - Just look at the goal we conceded against PSG in the last friendly - He could easily kick it away yet he just stood there and let him score... I yet to remember such a lack of determination...
Lemina - seriously this guy offers nothing but defending and isnt really strong physical as he is tiny and slim
Sturraro - Maybe with a bit of a brain and quality..
Rincon - Should I even bother - He obviously a 5th choice midfielder who came here to fill some void on our bench..

Matic is the best suitable player as he is a proper description of the type we need but Im not crazy about him as I like our players to do more than just defend..
P.S even though we dont really need it T.Silva could be an amazing coup
 

Cronios

Juventolog
Jun 7, 2004
27,519
Orgut, yes, referring quality, i agree, that's why I mentioned it too and there is nothing to debate here, we lack quality. Yes Pjanic is good enough to adapt and offer what is needed and Marchisio although he can, he hasn't been very reliable lately, so it is a concern. But it is a similar concern to the one we have been having every year, that's why i didn't get into it again. I raised the same concern over and over again, last time when we got Rincon, but our mngmnt is somehow convinced that they are good enough and have invested millions on them... I was hoping that we would sell some and upgrade our options, but it didn't happen, so I m mostly hoping that we will at least fix all the rest and then, they will eventually see into that too.


Bayern havent actually signed Göretzka, only rumoured to on free agency next summer.


I'm glad we didnt sign Tolisso, dont think he would fit 2 man CM role, and not for the 45m he cost.

- - - Updated - - -



Cronios allways says the complete OPPOSITE of whats logically needed every summer, takes extreme contrarianism to next level, so its corious people still take it at face value. I mean he is legit saying we need more offensive minded AM in our set up, when we are starting Pjanic AND Dybala centrally, the last thing the 3rd central midfielder needs to be is another AM like player...



I mean just recently he was heavily denying 4-2-3-1 is our main formation and how we should buy for 3-5-2 or 4-3-3 (first absolete, 2nd never play it) and host of other set ups Allegri barely is interested in.
Yes, i thought that a 3-5-2 or a 4-3-3 is much more logic than a 4-2-3-1, because we needed to buy a lot of players to change in such a formation and we would waste a lot of our players in the same time.
In the past years we have been stacking CBs and CMs, the 3-5-2 needs 3 CBs and 3 CMs fielded at all time and ensure that we can rest and rotate those players, we need at least twice that number, meaning 6CBs and 6CMs
To change into the 4-2-3-1 means that we only need four CBs and four CMs, we would need 4 wingbacks defensively orientated and offensively, as we had for the 3-5-2, as wingbacks in a 3-5-2 are needed to help more the front two than the back three. And a CAM, a player we DONT have and is very hard to find as there a few of them available. And lastly, we would need more side forwards.
It was quite hard to make the change, it would mean many sales and acquisitions and when we buy a lot, usually we get average quality, rather then when focusing on quality. The team is likely to need more time to raise them work levels in the standards we had. And selling the pieces that are left in exceed was never our forte after Moggi.
The transition is objectively much harder.

And it showed, we got two offensive wingers, one real defensive wingback, converted our SS into a CAM And are now left with a huge excess of CAMs, mostly defensive orientated. The Bonucci+dalves sales helped us clear a possible starter CB and offensive right winger excess.
And we are now a new team.
Sandro has the quality and the youth to adjust in a more defensive role, Asamoah is back on theory and de Sciglio can play left in theory, so we are covered in theory. Licht was always solid defensively and de Sciglio too.
So the main questionmark remain the 3 AMFs Pjaca, Mandzukic and Cuadrado can offer adept cover, our two main acquisitions are two dedicated players for that job, that will eventually become our starters there.
DCosta is destined to become our AML and Bernardeschi is destined to become our starter AMR.
And is left to settle is Dybala, imo he is not that good as a CAM And that was proven in the final, vs serious competition, however he is young and talented enough to adapt and Ace that position, which is going to be extremely important as it will set up our most scoring chances.
When Dybala, will be injured/rested/suspended there is going to be the need for a subber able to offer very performance on such a crucial role!

Bernardeschi and Pjanic could be trained to offer good enough services there, but not when they will be starting as DM and AMR! Those are starters on other positions, they will master their new roles hopefully and it's unrealistic to expect for them to be good cam subs if they are not invested in this role.
That's why I said that we need to have a dedicated subber for that role. We can convert Pjaca, or buy a dedicated sub CAM And sell some of our sub DMs that lay in excess...

PS Osman, I know that you can be a prick and focus on personal insults, but I also know that you can be reasonable and answer with arguments. We have ahead of a season a new season , with new faces and new roles, we have seen a couple of matches with this new core. After a few months, we will inevitably have a better view about our needs and strengths, why is it bad to discuss about our current status untill then? We have different views and different visions. Discussing them would give us a better access to a wider picture.
You know very well that i am always ready to explain my views in great details and civilized manner when someone asks me to, you don't have to provoke or please, just ask, it's a pleasure to talk about Juve with you!
 

KB824

Senior Member
Sep 16, 2003
31,789
We knew he was going somewhere. That's good enough in my book to ask somewhere for money. especially if somewhere can afford to pay that fucker 230k pounds per week.
That is not what you implied.

You said we should have used him as a bargaining chip for Matuidi, which would only mean that we knew he was going to PSG.

We didn't. No one did
 

Juliano13

Senior Member
May 6, 2012
5,017
Because I think we need CM reinforcements that are clearly superior to our options, yet we can't even sign a short term option that improves us marginally.

I was under the impression Bayern got Goretzka, my bad.
If you want to complain about us not doing as well as Bayern than selling is the real issue, not buying. Saying publicly that we will sell any player if he asks to leave is a stupid policy, even if it's just media bullshit and not actually true. It's a public invitation for the top clubs to agree terms with the players they want and get them to ask for a move, thus bending us over and lubricating us nicely for penetration. We are not yet at the level of appeal of Barca or Real or even Bayern and we can't match the salary budget that City, Manure and PSG have. Real player loyalty is a thing of the past. If Barca or City come to Dybala's agent and offer to double or triple his wage, he'll ask for a transfer.

Just compare our policy to Bayern's who publicly say they don't sell important players, period.

There are only 2 good reasons for a club like Juve to sell a player.
1. They don't need him.
2. They get such a high offer that they can use that money to compensate for the departure and improve the team even more.

By that criterion I think Pogba was a good sale and Vidal was a bad one. Unless Rugani really steps up this season, Bonucci will likely be a fail, too. Not to mention selling to a direct rival is :sergio:

- - - Updated - - -

That is not what you implied.

You said we should have used him as a bargaining chip for Matuidi, which would only mean that we knew he was going to PSG.

We didn't. No one did
I know. But since PSG clearly wanted him, I assume that if we hadn't just terminated his contract they would've contacted us at some point. Of course, it's also possible that they hate us so much that they wouldn't have given us any money for him. We'll never know.
 

KB824

Senior Member
Sep 16, 2003
31,789
If you want to complain about us not doing as well as Bayern than selling is the real issue, not buying. Saying publicly that we will sell any player if he asks to leave is a stupid policy, even if it's just media bullshit and not actually true. It's a public invitation for the top clubs to agree terms with the players they want and get them to ask for a move, thus bending us over and lubricating us nicely for penetration. We are not yet at the level of appeal of Barca or Real or even Bayern and we can't match the salary budget that City, Manure and PSG have. Real player loyalty is a thing of the past. If Barca or City come to Dybala's agent and offer to double or triple his wage, he'll ask for a transfer.

Just compare our policy to Bayern's who publicly say they don't sell important players, period.

There are only 2 good reasons for a club like Juve to sell a player.
1. They don't need him.
2. They get such a high offer that they can use that money to compensate for the departure and improve the team even more.

By that criterion I think Pogba was a good sale and Vidal was a bad one. Unless Rugani really steps up this season, Bonucci will likely be a fail, too. Not to mention selling to a direct rival is :sergio:

- - - Updated - - -



I know. But since PSG clearly wanted him, I assume that if we hadn't just terminated his contract they would've contacted us at some point. Of course, it's also possible that they hate us so much that they wouldn't have given us any money for him. We'll never know.
They never would have contacted us. However, if Alves had even the slightest inclination that he was going to go there, he could have let us know.

Assuming that he had any decency. Which apparently he does not.
 

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
Jun 25, 2003
39,334
If you want to complain about us not doing as well as Bayern than selling is the real issue, not buying. Saying publicly that we will sell any player if he asks to leave is a stupid policy, even if it's just media bullshit and not actually true. It's a public invitation for the top clubs to agree terms with the players they want and get them to ask for a move, thus bending us over and lubricating us nicely for penetration.

It's a public invitation for players like Dani Alves, Tevez, Pirlo, Khedira and many others who all came to us because they wanted to and because they know they could leave if they did not like the atmosphere. We've made far more through this strategy than we lost.

- - - Updated - - -

They never would have contacted us. However, if Alves had even the slightest inclination that he was going to go there, he could have let us know.

Assuming that he had any decency. Which apparently he does not.

The latest rumour is that Alves had pretty much joined City, until he was guaranteed Neymar would go to PSG.
 

Juliano13

Senior Member
May 6, 2012
5,017
They never would have contacted us. However, if Alves had even the slightest inclination that he was going to go there, he could have let us know.

Assuming that he had any decency. Which apparently he does not.
He's out for himself, big surprise. It was a smart to move to tell Marotta "I'm not happy here, please let me go for free to my buddy Pep. I want to finish my career with him." And when we let him go like complete suckers, he asks for a huge wage because there is no transfer fee. That 5-10m transfer fee would have come out of his pocket in lower wage no doubt.
 

KB824

Senior Member
Sep 16, 2003
31,789
It's a public invitation for players like Dani Alves, Tevez, Pirlo, Khedira and many others who all came to us because they wanted to and because they know they could leave if they did not like the atmosphere. We've made far more through this strategy than we lost.

- - - Updated - - -




The latest rumour is that Alves had pretty much joined City, until he was guaranteed Neymar would go to PSG.
Then maybe he should have waited to sign with them until that actually happened.

Still doesn't change my opinion that he has a malfunctioning moral compass

- - - Updated - - -

He's out for himself, big surprise. It was a smart to move to tell Marotta "I'm not happy here, please let me go for free to my buddy Pep. I want to finish my career with him." And when we let him go like complete suckers, he asks for a huge wage because there is no transfer fee. That 5-10m transfer fee would have come out of his pocket in lower wage no doubt.
How much are you realistically going to get for a 35 year old RB, though.

If its about the transfer fee, 5 million is a stretch. If its about the message, then yes, I would agree with you, in spite of Marotta repeating yesterday about if players are not happy here, he doesn't want them here.
 

Juliano13

Senior Member
May 6, 2012
5,017
It's a public invitation for players like Dani Alves, Tevez, Pirlo, Khedira and many others who all came to us because they wanted to and because they know they could leave if they did not like the atmosphere. We've made far more through this strategy than we lost.
That policy became public only after we sold Vidal. Tevez and Pirlo came before that and so did Khedira actually. And there wasn't that much competition for Alves when we got him, same with Pirlo and Khedira. Most people thought these guys were finished. It's pure speculation that these players only joined us because of our open barn policy.
 

Juliano13

Senior Member
May 6, 2012
5,017
How much are you realistically going to get for a 35 year old RB, though.

If its about the transfer fee, 5 million is a stretch. If its about the message, then yes, I would agree with you, in spite of Marotta repeating yesterday about if players are not happy here, he doesn't want them here.
5m is 5m. Deals have fallen through over less. And yes, the message is more important.

While in general it's not a good idea to keep an unhappy idiot, I think it was better to keep Alves than let him go for free. He's 34 and in his last year of contract. His only option is to perform 100% every game to get one last good contract at the end of the season. If he acts like a little bitch and we bench him, he's finished. And since we let him go for free, now we either spend 20m+ on a right back or settle for De Sciglio.
 

rakib567

Senior Member
Apr 27, 2013
10,087
We need a better RB than de Sciglio: Sidibe, Cancelo

We need a better DM then Khedira:
Matic, SMS

We want an alternative to Dybala: KeitaBalde

We need to offload many players: rincon sturaro lemina asamoah
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 90)