Summer mercato 2021-22 (36 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Lion

King of Tuz
Jan 24, 2007
36,185
We need to invest in the future. Let's scrap this Galactico policy. It's clearly not working out for us.
he's not old though? he's 27 turning 28. doesn't rely on speed but on pure strength and incredible ability to strike the ball. and his hold up play puts prime zlatan to shame

- - - Updated - - -

We need to invest in the future. Let's scrap this Galactico policy. It's clearly not working out for us.
let's put it this way. i'd trade dybala, kulusevksi and sandro for harry kane
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

Xperd

Allegrophobic Infidel
Jun 1, 2012
34,978
he's not old though? he's 27 turning 28. doesn't rely on speed but on pure strength and incredible ability to strike the ball. and his hold up play puts prime zlatan to shame
We will go back to the same old vicious cycle again where we invest big on a forward and are basically left with little to nothing to invest in other areas.
Kane would be a cherry on top kinda signing but atm this squad needs an overhaul and I'd much rather we sort out our burning issues first.
Not that we had any chance to lure Kane anyway..

- - - Updated - - -

he's not old though? he's 27 turning 28. doesn't rely on speed but on pure strength and incredible ability to strike the ball. and his hold up play puts prime zlatan to shame

- - - Updated - - -



let's put it this way. i'd trade dybala, kulusevksi and sandro for harry kane
This is just hypothetical. I seriously doubt Spurs would be down with that trade.
 

Lion

King of Tuz
Jan 24, 2007
36,185
We will go back to the same old vicious cycle again where we invest big on a forward and are basically left with little to nothing to invest in other areas.
Kane would be a cherry on top kinda signing but atm this squad needs an overhaul and I'd much rather we sort out our burning issues first.
Not that we had any chance to lure Kane anyway..
yeah for sure. why i said kane, locatelli and de paul. that would be an incredibly good mercato in the hands of a good coach. look at impact one player chiesa had for this team. imagine now the hunger de paul and locatelli would bring. then imagine the combo of ronaldo kane chiesa instead of the moody morata or out of form dybala.

also kane would be good just to see him fuck up zlatan, vidal, skiniar, manolas like this:


 

GordoDeCentral

Diez
Moderator
Apr 14, 2005
70,824
We will go back to the same old vicious cycle again where we invest big on a forward and are basically left with little to nothing to invest in other areas.
Kane would be a cherry on top kinda signing but atm this squad needs an overhaul and I'd much rather we sort out our burning issues first.
Not that we had any chance to lure Kane anyway..

- - - Updated - - -


This is just hypothetical. I seriously doubt Spurs would be down with that trade.
This is levy we are talking about :p possibly the best businessman in football.

Also no way 'arry comes to italy.
 

rainhard

Senior Member
May 5, 2004
4,365
  • Albert Tjaaland has scored 64 goals in just 37 games for Molde's youth side (Haaland played there too) indeed – this is 1.72 goals per 90 minutes! Even Haaland wasn't as prolific as his cousin as part of the youth team.
  • Tjaaland is shorter (1.85m) than Haaland (1.94m) but it's worth a mention that Albert is just 17, three years younger than Erling.
  • Tjaaland already represents Norway's youth side; just like Haaland, the 17-year-old is part of the national team since youth and he could get the first senior call-up much earlier than his peers.
  • The most definitive stat in Erling's favour is that by the time he turned 17, he had already become a semi-regular for Bryne in the Norwegian second tier. Albert, on the other hand, is yet to make his senior debut.

Why we dont go for Albert Tjaaland ?
 

spurdo

Senior Member
Jun 4, 2016
1,917
Would love Harry Kane and it would be a rare chance now to grab a world class striker. He is a cut above the likes of Morata and Icardi, and definitely in the top 5 strikers on Earth. I've been a long time admirer ever since he exploded on the scene, but above all I admire his hustle and grinta.

This is just hypothetical. I seriously doubt Spurs would be down with that trade.
Harry Kane is pushing for a transfer this season and they've previously been admirers of Dybala. Tottenham are 6th in the league and I highly doubt he'd like to stay on any longer. I don't think there ever in history has been such a high profile player without a single trophy for so long.
 

Post Ironic

Senior Member
Feb 9, 2013
42,253
412c9ed949c73b8aacfa04c027280a50.gif


Like Paro could've developed into Fabregas, or Giovinco into the next Del Piero. Alas, it was not meant to be.
Or Dybala the next Messi. Not meant to be.

- - - Updated - - -

I'm sorry why do people actually want Moise Kean back? Did I miss something? Kid struggled massively in EPL and barely starts for PSG. Is it really wise to waste a chunk of your transfer budget on him?
Youth product nostalgia, a young player who has had a pretty good season. And that homegrown thing is of benefit. But clearly not what we should be focussing on.

I mean, we have people who want Mauro Icardi, who has basically been outplayed and benched by Moise Kean :lol:
 

GarfielD

Senior Member
May 21, 2009
13,412
But where would Kane go? Ciry or Real are the only options I think, no way he comes to Italy. Maybe if we sell Ronaldo, but still I dont think he would like to come here.
 

JCK

Biased
JCK
May 11, 2004
125,386
We will go back to the same old vicious cycle again where we invest big on a forward and are basically left with little to nothing to invest in other areas.
Kane would be a cherry on top kinda signing but atm this squad needs an overhaul and I'd much rather we sort out our burning issues first.
Not that we had any chance to lure Kane anyway..

- - - Updated - - -


This is just hypothetical. I seriously doubt Spurs would be down with that trade.
Follow the new trend now, we invest big on a goalkeeper and keep little for the midfield.
 

IlCapitano

Senior Member
Dec 16, 2012
5,614
Kane another stat padder and a loser on a bad team. Zero ambition. Had a chance to choose his next club like Lewa and so many others did. He opted for a new contract knowing full well he will stay there for the long haul.

Enjoy rotting there
 

Osman

Koul Khara!
Aug 30, 2002
61,499
Kane another stat padder and a loser on a bad team. Zero ambition. Had a chance to choose his next club like Lewa and so many others did. He opted for a new contract knowing full well he will stay there for the long haul.

Enjoy rotting there
So he is a loser for resigning with his home team club that nurtured him since his youth? He gave them a chance to get their shit together ambition wise (fired their coach that made this team what they were), got close with CL final etc. Rather that then mercenaries that bolt at first chance.
.
 

IlCapitano

Senior Member
Dec 16, 2012
5,614
So he is a loser for resigning with his home team club that nurtured him since his youth? He gave them a chance to get their shit together ambition wise (fired their coach that made this team what they were), got close with CL final etc. Rather that then mercenaries that bolt at first chance.
.
I never said he is not loyal or that he doesn't like that homegrown money.

I have no idea why people argue this lmao. If you have not won anything you are a loser by the definition of the word, there is no room for debate here, this is a fact.
 

Osman

Koul Khara!
Aug 30, 2002
61,499
Its argued because its an idiotic simplistic notion.


One you seem to fall back on after calling top professionals losers, its hyperbolic, wether you excuse it away as by definition or not.



And you never said he's not loyal, but just a wrote mini essay of schoolyard negativity, shitting on him for staying. Are you politician by trade or something?
 
Last edited:

IlCapitano

Senior Member
Dec 16, 2012
5,614
Its argued because its an idiotic simplistic notion.


One you seem to fall back on after calling top professionals losers, its hyperbolic, wether you excuse it away as by definition or not.



And you never said he's not loyal, but just a wrote mini essay of schoolyard negativity, shitting on him for staying. Are you politician by trade or something?
Football is simple.


Go argue with the linguistics department, I didn't make the rules. In football you either win or lose. If you always lose and never win anything you are a loser, end of.

I only wrote facts, not my fault how you choose to interpret them.

He never won anything - fact
He had a chance to not sign the new contract and not spend his best years at fucking Tottenham, he chose not to - fact

Lewa, Aguero, Suarez, Benzema, Cavani none of them would be what they are today if they had stayed at their clubs and not won anything.

Unless Kane goes to a top club and proves himself at the highest level (or does it at Spurs) he'll be nothing more than English Di Natale.
 

Gigiventus

Senior Member
Mar 3, 2017
3,277
Exactly. Juventus are also not an attractive proposition atm.
Of course Juve are an attractive proposition at the moment. These are the same comments that we heard from PL pundits about Ramsey leaving Arsenal for Juve, about De Ligt choosing Juve over Barca, and about Ronaldo moving here.

Kane won't come not because we arent an attractive place for a player of his level but because he is by far the best English player there is and every PL club (which are richer than us) can offer Spurs/Kane more money and staying close to home. United and City can pay any amount for Kane and make him the center of the biggest project in his home country. Same reason why we can sign Chiesa or Donnarumma more easily than United or City.

- - - Updated - - -

I'm sorry why do people actually want Moise Kean back? Did I miss something? Kid struggled massively in EPL and barely starts for PSG. Is it really wise to waste a chunk of your transfer budget on him?
To be fair PSG has Neymar, Mbappe, Icardi and Di Maria. Any of our forwards would struggle to start there except Ronaldo. Kean does start a lot though and put together a very nice season.

His technique is still poor and he is nowhere near the type or level of Kane of course, but he would be nice to have. Particularly if we can trade player we don't really need for him (Some of Ramsey, Rabiot or Szczesny).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 22)