I did not understand these concepts at all. Where you draw these lines of support and resistance, they are based on the timeframe you're looking at I would assume, but it still was unclear. I also didn't understand how patterns can actually really predict anything. Maybe in a vacuum I could see it, sure. But in a highly interconnected global economy, what would an engulfing bull really matter if Trump tweets something or Saudi Arabia decides to fuck around with oil production?
The lines of support and resistance are where the market rejects movement up or down, based on timeframe, volume profile, or other types of statistical analysis like fibonacci retracement. If you notice a level like 3430 on SPX that has tested it 5 times in a month and it still hasn't broken through, you know the market considers it heavy resistance and there are probably sell orders. Some of my levels are autogenerated by trading software I purchase, but others I draw myself, just like trendlines. Sometimes technical patterns work out and other times they don't, especially if there is major news or a stupid tweet. For me, it's the only thing that works in the short to medium term, plus the algos use it as well. For longer term, it doesn't matter as much. But trading fundamentals doesn't always work out either -- just look at Intel's chart - they beat earnings and dropped 20% based on guidance nobody knew about. So it really depends on what you're comfortable with and the timeframe.
- - - Updated - - -
And if you look at the SPX chart i posted, that huge drop yesterday occurred after the Trump tweet, but also as soon as we hit 3430. It’s funny how big news always seems to occur at areas of technicals. I was a ducking retard and didn’t notice that resistance even though it’s as clear as day on my own chart.
