Stock Market (24 Viewers)

JuveJay

Senior Signor
Moderator
Mar 6, 2007
74,875
#21
no their original construction wasn't working so they installed this to support the heat exchanger's weight

and then sold it to their bitch ass faggy sillicon valley customers that obviously don't care despite the fact that construction might kill them but who cares
JFC it's on all of them. Some of them even look worse as you go through the thread, one has the zip tie underneath the corner mould at one point.
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

ALC

Ohaulick
Oct 28, 2010
46,523
#22
I think they just ran out of that particular part, didn’t want to stop production until more came in and this was their makeshift version.

- - - Updated - - -

The best part is that the guy was taking his car apart to fix fender gaps and misaligned headlights :rofl:

what a fucking joke, I’d be mad at fender gaps in a 20k car let alone 50+
 

lgorTudor

Senior Member
Jan 15, 2015
32,951
#23
I think they just ran out of that particular part, didn’t want to stop production until more came in and this was their makeshift
Apparently they wanted to go with a smaller LCC at first which didn't need support. Upon noticing that their heat management was miscalculated they had to bring a bigger one and came up with strap+mold constuction to hold it in place which already is half a death sentence by itself. Now they even ran out of the plastic molds so they got the faux wood bits

Cory Stuben of Munro hypothesized that the LCC needed to be lengthened with the addition of the heat pump system and that the added length/weight was creating leaks and/or failures during validation. Thus, Tesla added the band as a fix.

If the band holds long term, then I'm fine -- even if it's a little janky. Make it an official part, give it a number, and be done with it. However, in that same interview, Stuben also said that in one of the three Model Y's he inspected the fix had already cracked. That's not good. Given the stresses and vibrations inside a vehicle, this is especially concerning for the longevity of a critical sub-system.

If it does turn into a longevity issue, I would trust old Tesla to eventually make it right and provided an updated solution -- even out of warranty. They stood behind the Roadster when they needed new transmissions and they took care of early issues with the Falcon Doors on the Model X. I just hope "new" Tesla isn't so focused on quarterly profits they overlook their existing customer base and early adopters. The "within spec" mentality has gotten a bit out of hand lately and the company appears to be more focused on investor returns than customer satisfaction.
https://teslamotorsclub.com/tmc/posts/4981436/

To me, the shocking bit is not the wooden parts but that nobody complains about the improvised, inadequate solution with the band
 
Last edited:

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
115,898
#35
So we ended up bouncing off of the 50-day moving average on SPX, which is good. And we're also back above the 50 on the Nasdaq as well. Need to have a strong week.

0syWHVs5.png
 
OP
AFL_ITALIA

AFL_ITALIA

MAGISTERIAL
Jun 17, 2011
31,778
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #36
    Today was indeed very nice overall.








    Perhaps too nice :scared:

    - - - Updated - - -

    Why the fuck is Tesla up 13%? I don't understand this company at all.
     

    ALC

    Ohaulick
    Oct 28, 2010
    46,523
    #39
    word came out that Lgor applied for senior engineering position

    No but really nice that we bounced of the moving average. the next time we retest the lower border of that channel is during elections? :scared:
    do you have an engineering degree?
     

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 23)