Steven N'Zonzi - DM - Sevilla (6 Viewers)
- Thread starter Mark
- Start date
- Status
So we would have signed a 26M LB after spending:
14M on Pereyra
32M on Dybala
21M on Mandzukic
18M on Zaza
Without selling anyone? It was clear as day our mercato, as far as major investments go, was over! It was only after the Vidal sale that we went for 4 other players, 2 od which were loans. So tell me, how would we afford Alex Sandro if Vidal was here still?
And Badass, you STILL havent named a playmaker that was available back when we signed Hernanes that was also better than him, and that we could have signed as vice Marchisio. So how about you start with that before we go to the topic of how Vidals sale influenced the remainder of our mercato
- - - Updated - - -
Im about to find out
14M on Pereyra
32M on Dybala
21M on Mandzukic
18M on Zaza
Without selling anyone? It was clear as day our mercato, as far as major investments go, was over! It was only after the Vidal sale that we went for 4 other players, 2 od which were loans. So tell me, how would we afford Alex Sandro if Vidal was here still?
And Badass, you STILL havent named a playmaker that was available back when we signed Hernanes that was also better than him, and that we could have signed as vice Marchisio. So how about you start with that before we go to the topic of how Vidals sale influenced the remainder of our mercato
- - - Updated - - -
Im about to find out
Seriously even Osman of all fecking people shares the same valid point I've made. Go and interrogate him if you can't figure it out yourself. All you've delivered is drawn up some theories with some made up mathmatics on the clubs accounts and voila there's your answer.
I keep telling you WE DID NOT HAVE TO SELL VIDAL! and his sale did not justify bringing in hernanes. I don't give a fuck if he was the only player available, Vidal had all summer to push a transfer through so why (if he actually ever did ask to move) did the club accept so near the end of the window without adequate time for the club to find a decent replacement.
dont give me this bullshit about we would have bought siquera instead of Alex Sandro if we didn't sell Vidal, you have no proof that would have been the case, absolutely fucking none at all, and this goes to zach as well but he's a stubborn idiot who thinks he's always right and everyone else is stupid
I keep telling you WE DID NOT HAVE TO SELL VIDAL! and his sale did not justify bringing in hernanes. I don't give a fuck if he was the only player available, Vidal had all summer to push a transfer through so why (if he actually ever did ask to move) did the club accept so near the end of the window without adequate time for the club to find a decent replacement.
dont give me this bullshit about we would have bought siquera instead of Alex Sandro if we didn't sell Vidal, you have no proof that would have been the case, absolutely fucking none at all, and this goes to zach as well but he's a stubborn idiot who thinks he's always right and everyone else is stupid
Im just asking simple questions for which you cant give me answers it seems...
1. Name me one playmaker that was available back when we signed Hernanes that was also better than him, and that we could have signed as vice Marchisio. You cant? Then admit you were wrong about saying we shouldnt have signed Hernanes.
2. Read the transfer fees in my previous post again and ask yourself this - where do we take 26M from to sign Alex Sandro, WITHOUT any major sale happening that summer? Thats 85M right there, and without ANY sale and with the signing of AS, thats 111M spent. Clearly thats not happening, if you know anything about our finances
1. Name me one playmaker that was available back when we signed Hernanes that was also better than him, and that we could have signed as vice Marchisio. You cant? Then admit you were wrong about saying we shouldnt have signed Hernanes.
2. Read the transfer fees in my previous post again and ask yourself this - where do we take 26M from to sign Alex Sandro, WITHOUT any major sale happening that summer? Thats 85M right there, and without ANY sale and with the signing of AS, thats 111M spent. Clearly thats not happening, if you know anything about our finances
There is no question to be answered because VIDAL DID NOT NEED TO BE SOLD! it's that simple there for we did not need to look for a playmaker, it was only after Vidal was unnecessarily sold did the club decide to buy a 'playmaker' and besides even if we had signed a better player than hernanes it plays down your stupid 'sold vidal for Sandro theory' because we wouldn't have had the money to sign sandro in the first place according to you and zach, considering we had received major boost in revenue from the CL run the year before further plays down your theory for the need to sell in order to buy
Oh there us a question, two actually right above you, but you just chose to ignore them because you cant answer them.
But im a good guy so i wont push you to answer them anymore, but here is another one. We dont sell Vidal and dont buy Hernanes, then Marchisio gets injured. Who do you play and how do you line up the midfield?
But im a good guy so i wont push you to answer them anymore, but here is another one. We dont sell Vidal and dont buy Hernanes, then Marchisio gets injured. Who do you play and how do you line up the midfield?
The fact that you are still trying to justify the sale of Vidal and replacing him with hernanes because he was the best thing on the market at that moment in time is just 
and frankly one of the most stupid thing I've ever read on this forum.
That's like saying Dybala will be sold at the end of the transfer window and we will replace him with borriello because he's the only available option on the market...
and frankly one of the most stupid thing I've ever read on this forum.That's like saying Dybala will be sold at the end of the transfer window and we will replace him with borriello because he's the only available option on the market...
The fact that you are still trying to justify the sale of Vidal and replacing him with hernanes because he was the best thing on the market at that moment in time is just and frankly one of the most stupid thing I've ever read on this forum.
That's like saying Dybala will be sold at the end of the transfer window and we will replace him with borriello because he's the only available option on the market...
and frankly one of the most stupid thing I've ever read on this forum.That's like saying Dybala will be sold at the end of the transfer window and we will replace him with borriello because he's the only available option on the market...
- Status