We just gave him the 7 shirt, I don't get this.
He must have got into a fight with Allegri.
He must have got into a fight with Allegri.
Buy on AliExpress.com
Simone Zaza (12 Viewers)
- Thread starter Salvatore
- Start date
Buy on AliExpress.com
Seems like we agreed to buy him from Sassuolo before this summer even began, and his purchase was basically making good on a complex agreement that also ultimately involves Berardi's future? Wishful thinking?
It's really the only thing that makes sense to me. Only management knows, but hopefully we are liberating some funds to secure a proper AM. I can certainly live with Nando as 3rd choice CF, he's a good teammate, seems like a good guy.
It's really the only thing that makes sense to me. Only management knows, but hopefully we are liberating some funds to secure a proper AM. I can certainly live with Nando as 3rd choice CF, he's a good teammate, seems like a good guy.
I dont get the mocking comments here ?
We got Zaza as a backup striker. Tied to Berardi, as in we'd probably have some agreement that next season we trade zaza+cash for berardi.
Meanwhile, we expected to sell Llorente
However, despite several teams, an agreement over his wages couldnt been found, so nando is staying. meaning we have too many strikers. One of them wich no one is gonna loan cause of those wages.
So we loan Zaza instead, and make Nando the backup. We loan Zaza for 2mil with an 16 mil buyout.
What does this change about Berardi ? nothing. We valuated Zaza at 18 mil to trade for Berardi next season. IF west ham doesnt buy him, that still happens. if west hem does buy him, we still got 18 mil in our hands, only in cash instead of the player.
It doesnt matter too much. nando or zaza as backup, i'm fine with either. Keeping both would be too much. So we loan the one we can actually loan out. Fair enough.
We got Zaza as a backup striker. Tied to Berardi, as in we'd probably have some agreement that next season we trade zaza+cash for berardi.
Meanwhile, we expected to sell Llorente
However, despite several teams, an agreement over his wages couldnt been found, so nando is staying. meaning we have too many strikers. One of them wich no one is gonna loan cause of those wages.
So we loan Zaza instead, and make Nando the backup. We loan Zaza for 2mil with an 16 mil buyout.
What does this change about Berardi ? nothing. We valuated Zaza at 18 mil to trade for Berardi next season. IF west ham doesnt buy him, that still happens. if west hem does buy him, we still got 18 mil in our hands, only in cash instead of the player.
It doesnt matter too much. nando or zaza as backup, i'm fine with either. Keeping both would be too much. So we loan the one we can actually loan out. Fair enough.
Transfer managers get a part of money when a transfer takes place.sometimes directly and officially and other times unofficially. The player agents do take a cut themselves, depending on the transfer ammount. Many times in order to make that profit bigger, they give a part of their profit to the transfer managers, as they are the ones who sanction the invested sums from their clubs. Some player agents see this as an investment of making friendships and form strong ties over big club transfer managers.
When such deals happen, when a virtually unknown, unneeded and unwanted player, is given such a huge fee, from a big club to a smaller one, there usually is smth darker going on in the background, someone is making a profit from Juve's money...
When such deals happen, when a virtually unknown, unneeded and unwanted player, is given such a huge fee, from a big club to a smaller one, there usually is smth darker going on in the background, someone is making a profit from Juve's money...
