[SERIE A] Chievo vs JUVENTUS (09/11/08) (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter Azzurri7
- Start date
i don't know what you guys think, but i'm a little concerned about camo's return. of course he's a great player but i just like the team right now...tiago is great, marco also, i hope the changes won't hurt us. those players settled very good in the starting line-up because of the injuries and look at us now.
Yeah right, that's what i was saying. 
I'm unhappy as the rest of you for not seeing Giovinco play but as much as i'd like to protest, Ranieri isn't giving me an opportunity to do that because he keeps winning.
Some of you though are ready to linch the guy for not playing Giovinco, even if we win 1000:0.
Giovinco is not "guilty" for the 6 straight wins but you don't change the team that wins, or in our case, you don't change the winning system.
We got our wins with 4-4-2, with wingers that attack and help the defense, with a creative midfielder and a defensive midfielder.
This is what Ranieri doesn't want to change. Can you blame him ?
Actually, you can and you do blame him, but God knows what gives you the right and how do you justify that.
I'm unhappy as the rest of you for not seeing Giovinco play but as much as i'd like to protest, Ranieri isn't giving me an opportunity to do that because he keeps winning.
Some of you though are ready to linch the guy for not playing Giovinco, even if we win 1000:0.
Giovinco is not "guilty" for the 6 straight wins but you don't change the team that wins, or in our case, you don't change the winning system.
We got our wins with 4-4-2, with wingers that attack and help the defense, with a creative midfielder and a defensive midfielder.
This is what Ranieri doesn't want to change. Can you blame him ?
Actually, you can and you do blame him, but God knows what gives you the right and how do you justify that.
Ален;1798954 said:
Yeah right, that's what i was saying.
I'm unhappy as the rest of you for not seeing Giovinco play but as much as i'd like to protest, Ranieri isn't giving me an opportunity to do that because he keeps winning.
Some of you though are ready to linch the guy for not playing Giovinco, even if we win 1000:0.
Giovinco is not "guilty" for the 6 straight wins but you don't change the team that wins, or in our case, you don't change the winning system.
We got our wins with 4-4-2, with wingers that attack and help the defense, with a creative midfielder and a defensive midfielder.
This is what Ranieri doesn't want to change. Can you blame him ?
Actually, you can and you do blame him, but God knows what gives you the right and how do you justify that.
I'm unhappy as the rest of you for not seeing Giovinco play but as much as i'd like to protest, Ranieri isn't giving me an opportunity to do that because he keeps winning.
Some of you though are ready to linch the guy for not playing Giovinco, even if we win 1000:0.
Giovinco is not "guilty" for the 6 straight wins but you don't change the team that wins, or in our case, you don't change the winning system.
We got our wins with 4-4-2, with wingers that attack and help the defense, with a creative midfielder and a defensive midfielder.
This is what Ranieri doesn't want to change. Can you blame him ?
Actually, you can and you do blame him, but God knows what gives you the right and how do you justify that.
For me , this is not the case .
If we can't win with Giovinco .. I am with our coach for not starting with Giovinco .
But if you remember correctly Giovinco was great against Catania(MOM) and Very good against Bate(2 assists) and average against Palermo .
He is not the problem of the bad results , against Bate we played with only one DM !! , against Catania , we were just unlucky and against Palermo Sissoko got a red card from the first half .
and afterall we were in bad shape , many players were not performing well .
The problem is that Ranieri until now didn't give Giovinco enough playing time .
For example , in today's match what would hurt the team if Ranieri put on Giovinco in the last 10/15 minutes ?
I mean , he needed the last 5 minute more than Amauri , don't you agree ?
I agree with everything. He was certainly not to be blamed for the lost pts when he played (actually, he helped us not to lose even more pts by losing to Catania and BATE) but what i'm saying is that Ranieri's decision to play with the guys that played in the previous 6 matches has been proven correct.
Some here claim it wasn't a correct decission and Giovinco must have played.
I'm also mad Ranieri is not giving him at least 15-20 minutes and with this critic i agree. But i dissagree with those who keep moaning as if we're losing match after match.
Some here claim it wasn't a correct decission and Giovinco must have played.
I'm also mad Ranieri is not giving him at least 15-20 minutes and with this critic i agree. But i dissagree with those who keep moaning as if we're losing match after match.
De Ceglie has the insticts of a fb. U can tell by watching him play in midfield that his attributes are more suited as a lb. He doesn't run at defenders, he looks for quick exchanges that play him into space, and off the ball he always goes down the line. As a fb, these are great qualities, but in midfield we need some1 who can dribble at defenders, act as a playmaker, and cut inside and go for goal like Nedved. He did an admirable job, but Giovinco is clearly the better fit.
I'm starting to get the feeling Ranieri see's De Ceglie more as a left midfielder than a lb, although I'm sure his confidence in Molinaro is playing a part in that decision. De Ceglie is not defensively weaker than Molinaro. I have yet to see any instances this season that prove that De Ceglie is a defensive liability relative to Molinaro. The Zenit game should have settled that arguement.
As for the match, typical of our play vs low ranked teams. Were capable of alot better, but as long we get the points I could care less how unimpressive compared to other games we are.
Tiago did a good job, imo. He got bold on a few occassion but the run's werent there. Still, I like the way he moves the ball in comparison to Poulsen or Momo. He was our best player in midfield today.
Typical Del Piero. Did good things with the ball all game and scored another great free kick. Legend.
I'm starting to get the feeling Ranieri see's De Ceglie more as a left midfielder than a lb, although I'm sure his confidence in Molinaro is playing a part in that decision. De Ceglie is not defensively weaker than Molinaro. I have yet to see any instances this season that prove that De Ceglie is a defensive liability relative to Molinaro. The Zenit game should have settled that arguement.
As for the match, typical of our play vs low ranked teams. Were capable of alot better, but as long we get the points I could care less how unimpressive compared to other games we are.
Tiago did a good job, imo. He got bold on a few occassion but the run's werent there. Still, I like the way he moves the ball in comparison to Poulsen or Momo. He was our best player in midfield today.
Typical Del Piero. Did good things with the ball all game and scored another great free kick. Legend.