Senad Lulić - LB/LW - Lazio (2 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

j0ker

Capo di tutti capi
Jan 5, 2006
22,892
The first time translation was correct yet i changed it , interpretation is based on the person reading it .
And as for this news .



Another source , please ask them to also stop posting thx.
http://www.vecchiasignora.com/topic...co-quali-corsport-lotito-vuole-almeno-18-mln/

I think you should be the one who should stop posting now .
Then please explain why it's says that both Juve and Lazio deny the medical.

How is it personal interpretation when it's the opposite of it?

Unless they are posting two different versions of it. :shifty:

edit:

Apparently Bosnia's coach gave Lulic a few days free for some formalities.

A deal is sounding more likely every day.

I like him as a player, but hopefully we don't have to spend too much cash.
 

GarfielD

Senior Member
May 21, 2009
13,549
Then please explain why it's says that both Juve and Lazio deny the medical.

How is it personal interpretation when it's the opposite of it?

Unless they are posting two different versions of it. :shifty:

edit:

Apparently Bosnia's coach gave Lulic a few days free for some formalities.

A deal is sounding more likely every day.

I like him as a player, but hopefully we don't have to spend too much cash.
We wont. He isnt going to be expensive.
 

Vlad

In Allegri We Trust
May 23, 2011
24,223
Then please explain why it's says that both Juve and Lazio deny the medical.

How is it personal interpretation when it's the opposite of it?

Unless they are posting two different versions of it. :shifty:

edit:

Apparently Bosnia's coach gave Lulic a few days free for some formalities.

A deal is sounding more likely every day.

I like him as a player, but hopefully we don't have to spend too much cash.
They are reporting 15m, but we'll look to include Quag, and /or Isla into the deal.
 

zizinho

Senior Member
Apr 14, 2013
51,816
or just sell Immobile (12-13M half) and Vucinic (apparently, Arsenal offered 10M, but even if not, we can get aleast 7M for him) and get Sanchez for that money
 

jukazem

Senior Member
Feb 10, 2007
4,989
if Lulic is coming then I hope Peluso is included alongside Quagliarella. other than player swap I don't see any other way to sell Peluso who is 30yrs and Juve need around 3.6m to write him off without loss (which I think is impossible atm). if not Peluso then De Ceglie, another player who would be difficult to sell stand-alone.

edit: also Peluso came through Lazio Primavera I think, so :xfinger:.
 

zizinho

Senior Member
Apr 14, 2013
51,816
Quagliarella + Peluso (no money included) for Lulic would be a fair deal. also i didnt know that Peluso is their youth product, which could be a big + in this deal. but what bothers me is the rumoured wages for Lulic which would be 2M. is he really worth that? i would give him 1M-1.5M max because our wage list is high anyway and with Sanchez and Nani possibly coming in + Pogba renewing (salary rise), and then to waste 2M on Lulic would be not good. so, for Quag and Peluso and 1M wages he would be an OK signing...
 

jakku7

Senior Member
Jun 29, 2011
1,073
15m is just too much.

10-12 m is maximum we should offer. Lulic is really solid player and I rate him over Evra, but 15m is exaggeration.
 

petersmit

Senior Member
Mar 14, 2006
7,042
I think Lulic is going to be a player to fill in for Asamoah (african nations cup) and so we can switch formations (he can play LB LM and LW)

15M is to much... just get half of him (Asamoah style) for Quag... no need to spend that much money on a 28 year old who is not going to make the first XI
 

Robee

Senior Member
Jun 21, 2011
7,188
I think Lulic is going to be a player to fill in for Asamoah (african nations cup) and so we can switch formations (he can play LB LM and LW)

15M is to much... just get half of him (Asamoah style) for Quag... no need to spend that much money on a 28 year old who is not going to make the first XI
No need to spend/trade anything on Lulic while we might switch to a back four and therefor need a natural LB.
 

petersmit

Senior Member
Mar 14, 2006
7,042
I think that's why we are going for him, since he can play as a LW or LB in 4-3-3, and as a LWB in 3-5-2... not many players suit so many positions in so many formations...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 2)