Do you think that Giovinco can achieve Cassano level in five years while not playing regular football and just being a sub for a star player?
I would suggest you to think, because it certianly isn't a plain logic. It's plain wishfull thinking if you ask me.
On the contrary,
i gave my opinion for both cases (if he does reaches
Cassano's level and if he doesnt)
at any case, its a win win situation for us! To outline the "failing" scenario once more;
As long as Giovinco doesnt lives up to his potential,
he will be a sub, and IMO he is good enough for a sub, nursing our current need for a decent Diego sub.
Five years from now, he will be better than he is now at any case (even marginally better) and even if he doesnt reaches Cassano's level, he will cost more than he does now (because he will still be as young as Cassano is now) and land us a better profit!
In the mean time, we have a decent sub for Diego, no need to invest on other subs, until sell him and we will still having a chance to have a new world class player, without any kind of investment, in case he lives up to the expectation.
Wishful thinking would be that we would rely on him as a starter in the next 10 years!
Keeping him as Diego's sub and see what happens isnt wishful thinking,
just prudent thinking, that takes in consideration both scenarios and is open to a various of changes!
Wishful thinking is that Cassano will change and adapt here and now, in our system, at this level.
Wishful thinking is that the Cassano-Amauri duo will be more prolific than the Iaquinta-Amauri duo is now.
Wishful thinking is that we will have no issues if we use/rotate Diego and Cassano for the same role...
Consider the long term needs of our team:
-We need a Diego subber, good enough to emulate his extremely important/essential work/role in our team. Someone who is young enough to sit on the bench, more than Diego without complaining, but also already good enough to offer some serious assist now!
-Once Treze leaves, we will need a starter finisher to complete Amauri's lack of finishing.
(Aging DP and Iaq can only play marginal roles, in the near future)
Where does Cassano serves our needs there??
Cassano is a great tool, but we have our very own needs and strengths.
We already have a SS creative as him (Amauri) and an AMF of his status (Diego).
Turning one of them into a sub, would be unwise and undermine our investment on them! And even worse, we would still have to buy a finisher anyway and a replacement to Diego, if we offload Giovinco too!
Cassano right now would only make sense, if we were to sell Amauri or Diego! Or if we change our formation and bench one of Diego,Melo,Sissoko and Marchisio. Counterproductive in both cases...