Giovinco can also take on players, which is important when pressure is on our defense and we have more people behind the ball.
i must admit that i did not see the second half because my stream was crap, but if i am correct that we defended more or less with 10 men, then where could giovinco help there ? if we can't bring the ball properly to our strikers or attacking players then we don't need giovinco.
giovinco is not really known for his defensive qualities, so he would need to have someone who plays the ball properly to him.
when you are under pressure and the opponent attacks it is very difficult to get a proper pass to your teammate that plays more forward.
i think every football player knows what i'm talking about:
when you get subbed in and the team does currently play crap and is under pressure the more you play towards the opponents goal the more frustrated you will get, because the ball will not even come to you or if it comes to you it is not intended and a ball that someone of the opponent misplaced.
i do not want to compare me with giovinco, but i did play not just a few years of football and when your backline sucks and does not succeed to make a decent pass to the midfield then there is not much you can do. as normal midfielder you have the possibility to fall back to collect the ball right in front of your defense, but as attacking player you are dependend on the balls you get from the defenders or more defensive midfielders ... and when this balls are just kicked high out of the own half there is nothing you can do...
trust someone who probably got one or two gray hairs already, because these crap 50/50 passes from the defense are easier for the opponent to get than yourself will just make you frustrated ... you always have to fight for the ball even if the pass comes from your teammate... you dont want giovinco to get gray hair already, do you ?